Is There Scientific Evidence Supporting the Floor of Noah?

[WinterBorn]

You think Everest grew 20,000 feet in 6000 years?

Yes, in a way. I hear many people want to get to the top of the mount that there is a line now. What's tragic is they end up freezing to death waiting.

Mt. Everest wasn't as big before and the global flood caused it to rise to its present point now. The evidence is the marine fossils found near the top. Catastrophism.

The presence of marine fossils at the top of Everest proves Evolution

plate tectonics forced those mountain ranges up at a time there were only simple simple creatures at the bottom of the sea

No dinosaur bones on top of Everest

sorry jr but it proves nothing of the sort,,,

Then why, if all the mountains rose during or after the Great Flood, are there no higher animals in the rock formations on Everest?

 

[progressive hunter]

You think Everest grew 20,000 feet in 6000 years?

Yes, in a way. I hear many people want to get to the top of the mount that there is a line now. What's tragic is they end up freezing to death waiting.

Mt. Everest wasn't as big before and the global flood caused it to rise to its present point now. The evidence is the marine fossils found near the top. Catastrophism.

The presence of marine fossils at the top of Everest proves Evolution

plate tectonics forced those mountain ranges up at a time there were only simple simple creatures at the bottom of the sea

No dinosaur bones on top of Everest

sorry jr but it proves nothing of the sort,,,

Then why, if all the mountains rose during or after the Great Flood, are there no higher animals in the rock formations on Everest?

why would there be???

if it was the bottom of the ocean before it rose then why would a land animal be on it???


or it could be that not every rock on the mountain has been opened yet,,,

truth is no one knows what happened

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Do I believe there is evidence that species transform over very long periods of time? Absolutely.

We cannot demonstrate nor observe long periods of time, so it's not part of the scientific method. One can't go back in time. Long time a "faith-based" belief. All we know is that species change over short time.

Actually, we can observe long periods of time. The Hubble telescope has allowed an unprecedented look back in time at very distant galaxies.

How do ID’iot creationists explain how light travels?

See Hollie, it’s happened. I got sucked into this debate with this Christian idiot and now I am just shaking my head and wondering how a grown man can ignore facts, data and demonstrate zero common sense. Told ya, these people are endlessly annoying.

 

[progressive hunter]

If you you even begin to believe that Bigfoot could exist, then you are beyond hope. There is there is no Bigfoot and anybody who hasn’t come to that conclusion should never be trusted. The fact that you can’t come to that conclusion tells me all I need to know. You’re not a scientific thinker, and that’s ok. You are somebody who wants to believe, but science is not about wanting to believe. It’s about facts, data, research, testing and skepticism.

I hadn't given BF or Sasquatch much thought. What caught my eye was the FBI was involved and so read the story. Some people found additional evidence in the past and the FBI had analyzed it. That was the story. For you to jump to such silly conclusions about me tells me you aren't scientific nor understand collecting the evidence. For example, you recognize overwhelming evidence of long time from radiometric dating, but do not present any. Instead, you explain it by reasoning what authority and smarter people than you have told you. That doesn't give me much confidence in your argument because I am smarter than you and can argue against what your authority and smarter people have told you.

I am done with this debate. The earth is billions of years old, and anybody who doesn’t think so is a Christian idiot. See ya.

the poor little bigot cant prove anything so he runs to the bathroom for some personal time,,,

its OK we still loath you,,,

 

[rightwinger]

You think Everest grew 20,000 feet in 6000 years?

Yes, in a way. I hear many people want to get to the top of the mount that there is a line now. What's tragic is they end up freezing to death waiting.

Mt. Everest wasn't as big before and the global flood caused it to rise to its present point now. The evidence is the marine fossils found near the top. Catastrophism.

The presence of marine fossils at the top of Everest proves Evolution

plate tectonics forced those mountain ranges up at a time there were only simple simple creatures at the bottom of the sea

No dinosaur bones on top of Everest

sorry jr but it proves nothing of the sort,,,

Why are there only evidence of simple creatures on mountain tops?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

If you you even begin to believe that Bigfoot could exist, then you are beyond hope. There is there is no Bigfoot and anybody who hasn’t come to that conclusion should never be trusted. The fact that you can’t come to that conclusion tells me all I need to know. You’re not a scientific thinker, and that’s ok. You are somebody who wants to believe, but science is not about wanting to believe. It’s about facts, data, research, testing and skepticism.

I hadn't given BF or Sasquatch much thought. What caught my eye was the FBI was involved and so read the story. Some people found additional evidence in the past and the FBI had analyzed it. That was the story. For you to jump to such silly conclusions about me tells me you aren't scientific nor understand collecting the evidence. For example, you recognize overwhelming evidence of long time from radiometric dating, but do not present any. Instead, you explain it by reasoning what authority and smarter people than you have told you. That doesn't give me much confidence in your argument because I am smarter than you and can argue against what your authority and smarter people have told you.

I am done with this debate. The earth is billions of years old, and anybody who doesn’t think so is a Christian idiot. See ya.

the poor little bigot cant prove anything so he runs to the bathroom for some personal time,,,

its OK we still loath you,,,

There is more evidence that Jesus took it in the ass from the 12 disciples (and liked it) than the earth is 6000 years old.

 

[alang1216]

My, my, my. I destroyed your "faith-based" story of how evos think rock bends over long time to the point that you do not understand your own land pressure.

I know concrete does not bend. It becomes brittle as it ages, cracks, and breaks off into small pieces.

Cement hardens through a chemical reaction with water; it even hardens under water. That's what formed the rock layer all over the globe. The rock layer had to be liquid form when it bent thousands of years ago during the global flood.

The water pressure is enough to bend the rock layers. Water is so dense that it would be like hitting rock if you jumped into it from high enough and a flood so devastating that it could kill all the life on earth.

The other evidence is Earth is one place where the surface is 75% water. The evos cannot explain this.

ETA: Your sand would have to be really heated to liquefy. Sedimentary layers aren't like that.

It is really hard to know how to answer this. It is like you throw stuff at a wall and hope something makes sense.

Your problem comes from your 'knowing' that the Earth is young so anything you see must be the result of recent (<6,000 years) activity. If you actually looked at the world without the blinders imposed by YEC, you'd see what geologists have learned through hundreds of years of study. Continents move, mountains rise and are worn down and oceans are created and destroyed. None of these can happen in a few thousand years but they are all going on today just as they always have.

 

[progressive hunter]

You think Everest grew 20,000 feet in 6000 years?

Yes, in a way. I hear many people want to get to the top of the mount that there is a line now. What's tragic is they end up freezing to death waiting.

Mt. Everest wasn't as big before and the global flood caused it to rise to its present point now. The evidence is the marine fossils found near the top. Catastrophism.

The presence of marine fossils at the top of Everest proves Evolution

plate tectonics forced those mountain ranges up at a time there were only simple simple creatures at the bottom of the sea

No dinosaur bones on top of Everest

sorry jr but it proves nothing of the sort,,,

Why are there only evidence of simple creatures on mountain tops?

well arent you an arrogant prick to call them simple creatures,,,

so far their are smarter than you,,,

truth is you nor I know or ever will,,,all you can do is speculate and all I can do is gaze in wonder at the world around us,,

on the other hand why are there no dinos in my yard???

I dont know do you???

 

[progressive hunter]

If you you even begin to believe that Bigfoot could exist, then you are beyond hope. There is there is no Bigfoot and anybody who hasn’t come to that conclusion should never be trusted. The fact that you can’t come to that conclusion tells me all I need to know. You’re not a scientific thinker, and that’s ok. You are somebody who wants to believe, but science is not about wanting to believe. It’s about facts, data, research, testing and skepticism.

I hadn't given BF or Sasquatch much thought. What caught my eye was the FBI was involved and so read the story. Some people found additional evidence in the past and the FBI had analyzed it. That was the story. For you to jump to such silly conclusions about me tells me you aren't scientific nor understand collecting the evidence. For example, you recognize overwhelming evidence of long time from radiometric dating, but do not present any. Instead, you explain it by reasoning what authority and smarter people than you have told you. That doesn't give me much confidence in your argument because I am smarter than you and can argue against what your authority and smarter people have told you.

I am done with this debate. The earth is billions of years old, and anybody who doesn’t think so is a Christian idiot. See ya.

the poor little bigot cant prove anything so he runs to the bathroom for some personal time,,,

its OK we still loath you,,,

There is more evidence that Jesus took it in the ass from the 12 disciples (and liked it) than the earth is 6000 years old.

I never said it was 6K old,,,

and whats the obsession with anal sex???

 

[alang1216]

Metamorphic rock

That's not much of an argument. The claim with metamorphic rocks some or all of the minerals in the original rock are replaced, atom by atom, to form new minerals. This is not possible, so it's a "faith-based" belief. Else we would see an experiment on how this is done.

Metamorphic rocks are claimed to be often squished, smeared out, and folded. Despite these uncomfortable conditions, metamorphic rocks do not get hot enough to melt, or they would become igneous rocks -- Igneous rock - Wikipedia.

"The claim with metamorphic rocks some or all of the minerals in the original rock are replaced, atom by atom, to form new minerals. This is not possible"
What's the basis for this claim?

 

[alang1216]

on the other hand why are there no dinos in my yard???

Sure there are. They're the animals with the feathers.

 

[progressive hunter]

on the other hand why are there no dinos in my yard???

Sure there are. They're the animals with the feathers.

there sure are some koo koo birds here though

 

[alang1216]

truth is no one knows what happened

You seem pretty sure of what didn't happen. Why is that?

 

[progressive hunter]

truth is no one knows what happened

You seem pretty sure of what didn't happen. Why is that?

its called lack of evidences mixed with crazy talk like dinos magically turned into chickens,,,or that we all came from a rock,,,


OH and the personal attacks if I refused to believe

 

[alang1216]

on the other hand why are there no dinos in my yard???

Sure there are. They're the animals with the feathers.

there sure are some koo koo birds here though

Actually, birds and dinos are so close anatomically, that many bird species wheren't recognized as birds until better fossils showed they had feathers.

 

[alang1216]

truth is no one knows what happened

You seem pretty sure of what didn't happen. Why is that?

its called lack of evidences mixed with crazy talk like dinos magically turned into chickens,,,or that we all came from a rock,,,


OH and the personal attacks if I refused to believe

You mean personal attacks like calling someone's idea 'crazy'?

 

[progressive hunter]

on the other hand why are there no dinos in my yard???

Sure there are. They're the animals with the feathers.

there sure are some koo koo birds here though

Actually, birds and dinos are so close anatomically, that many bird species wheren't recognized as birds until better fossils showed they had feathers.

that could as easily mean a common designer as magical transformation, in fact its more likely a common designer,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

truth is no one knows what happened

You seem pretty sure of what didn't happen. Why is that?

its called lack of evidences mixed with crazy talk like dinos magically turned into chickens,,,or that we all came from a rock,,,


OH and the personal attacks if I refused to believe

You mean personal attacks like calling someone's idea 'crazy'?

the idea being crazy is not a personal attack,,,

 

[WinterBorn]

You think Everest grew 20,000 feet in 6000 years?

Yes, in a way. I hear many people want to get to the top of the mount that there is a line now. What's tragic is they end up freezing to death waiting.

Mt. Everest wasn't as big before and the global flood caused it to rise to its present point now. The evidence is the marine fossils found near the top. Catastrophism.

The presence of marine fossils at the top of Everest proves Evolution

plate tectonics forced those mountain ranges up at a time there were only simple simple creatures at the bottom of the sea

No dinosaur bones on top of Everest

sorry jr but it proves nothing of the sort,,,

Then why, if all the mountains rose during or after the Great Flood, are there no higher animals in the rock formations on Everest?

why would there be???

if it was the bottom of the ocean before it rose then why would a land animal be on it???


or it could be that not every rock on the mountain has been opened yet,,,

truth is no one knows what happened

So it rose to 29,000 feet above sea level before any land animal went there? Okey dokey.

 

[alang1216]

You mean personal attacks like calling someone's idea 'crazy'?

the idea being crazy is not a personal attack,,,

Good to know since I assumed being called a 'koo koo bird' was an attack on me. Glad you cleared that up.