absolutely absurd. One of the times in my life when I was almost knocked down by the holiness in the Catholic Church was... after I had been gone a long time.. came back because of... well, that's a LONG story I don't have time for but in any case, I went to a Mass after years of being away and I had this immediate thought/feeling "I can't stay in this Church. It is too holy."
Of course that sounds like the devil whispering in my ear and I somehow overcame that weird thought...
I had thought those people at Mass were likely WAY too holy for me... Otherwise, why would I feel that way? But no, I found out soon enough they were sinners just like me. The holiness came from Christ, not people (though those who live by His Ways are holy to one degree or another...)
The priest at that Mass eventually told me (in confession) about the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
So that splains things...
Hey, same thing that happens at my church as well. People think that the church is for the spiritually healthy only. But, it's not. It's also for the spiritually sick as well. It's for all for we all fall short the glory of God. Thus, even the people who seem to have it all together need improvement as well.
Your feelings are on that often occurs in many larger churches across the U.S. All Christian Churches teach Christ. The way Christ is taught differs. Many Christian churches teach a lot of fire and damnation. It's been my experience working for 16 years at a Catholic high school that both The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the RCC do not preach in this manner. We simply seek the best possible outcome of our lives in the eternities and teach about the positive things we can do to get there. The reason that Paul taught about 3 levels or glories of heaven is because not all will receive the saving ordinances from those who have actual authority from Jesus Christ to be performing those ordinances like baptism. That's where we differ, greatly.
Just take the connection of the Sacraments (Eucharist) and baptism by water. The RCC has no connection between the two from what I can see. The LDS church does. A close connection in that we recommit every Sunday to our baptismal covenants we made at baptism by partaking the Sacrament. The Sacrament is to remember our commitment and covenants to the Lord. There's no need for bread to turn to living flesh and wine (we use water so all get to partake of that sacrament) to actual drinking of blood. Here is our baptismal prayers for the bread and water:
Bread: O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this bread to the souls of all those who partake of it, that they may eat in remembrance of the body of thy Son, and witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son, and always remember him and keep his commandments which he has given them; that they may always have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.
Water: O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this water to the souls of all those who drink of it, that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them; that they may witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they do always remember him, that they may have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.
The Bread is that we are "willing" to do the Lord's work and the Water is that we "do" his work with authority. Both are in "remembrance" of the body and blood that was shed for our atonement with Christ.
The way I understand the RCC version of the Sacraments at Mass is that the Lord is pulled down off his throne by the priest to die again and again and again draining his blood and killing his flesh. The priests think they actually have the power to tell God to get off his throne and die over and over is not something I'd agree with.