Is the Occupation of the West Bank Morally Justified?

[Indeependent]

I don't.

I love God. So I speak truth that is uncomfortable to you to hear. If you loved God you would speak the truth too.

You have literally just born false witness against your neighbor. Me.

You're not my neighbor but you are an idiot.

 

[ding]

Arabs keep starting wars, keep losing.

What's your point?

Jews are the genetic brothers of Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese, study finds

If a common heritage conferred peace, then perhaps the long history of conflict in the Middle East would have been resolved years ago. For, according to a new scientific study, Jews are the genetic brothers of Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese, and they all share a common genetic lineage that...

www.sciencedaily.com

 

[ding]

You're not my neighbor but you are an idiot.

That would be you rationalizing that you didn't bear false witness against me.

 

[ding]

Not their call.

But your statement proves there is an occupation.

My favorite part of the 6 Day War was when every single Arab nation, including Jordan, got wiped out, everyone of their leaders, including Jordan, was swearing by Allah that they would attack Israel again as soon as possible.
Yes, Jordan should definitely get "their" West Bank again after promising to attack again.
Your stupidity is asstounding.

Not sure what that had to do with the post you were replying to but I do hope it made you feel better, brother.

 

[Indeependent]

Not sure what that had to do with the post you were replying to but I do hope it made you feel better, brother.

You are very Christian so you would give a weapon to the guy who has just sworn to try and kill you again.
Jews don't play that game.

 

[irosie91]

The lands Israel took by force in 1967, Karl.

there was a state of war in the Levant that had not ended for many centuries. It became inflamed in
1967 by Russian/Baathist interests led by Gamal Abdul
Nasser whose interest was a UNITED BAATHIST empire in the Levant. Russian interests also included SPHERE OF INFLUENCE over the nascent Baathist empire.
Israel was slated for annhilation by the BAATHIST
CULT------but fought back and survived. dingy wept

 

[Indeependent]

there was a state of war in the Levant that had not ended for many centuries. It became inflamed in
1967 by Russian/Baathist interests led by Gamal Abdul
Nasser whose interest was a UNITED BAATHIST empire in the Levant. Russian interests also included SPHERE OF INFLUENCE over the nascent Baathist empire.
Israel was slated for annhilation by the BAATHIST
CULT------but fought back and survived. dingy wept

Ding isn't playing dumb, he is dumb.

 

[ding]

You are very Christian so you would give a weapon to the guy who has just sworn to try and kill you again.
Jews don't play that game.

If you want to make the moral argument that Israel is occupying Palestine to protect themselves, but that seems like a weak argument. Israel is pretty damn powerful relative to the Palestinians.

 

[ding]

Ding isn't playing dumb, he is dumb.

I understand that you are upset because there is no moral argument to be made for the continuing occupation so you need to lash out at me, but that's only harming your soul.

 

[Indeependent]

If you want to make the moral argument that Israel is occupying Palestine to protect themselves, but that seems like a weak argument. Israel is pretty damn powerful relative to the Palestinians.

Israel was not threatened by the Palestinians after Israel defeated the 5 Arab armies; Israel was threatened by every one of those nations.

 

[ding]

there was a state of war in the Levant that had not ended for many centuries. It became inflamed in
1967 by Russian/Baathist interests led by Gamal Abdul
Nasser whose interest was a UNITED BAATHIST empire in the Levant. Russian interests also included SPHERE OF INFLUENCE over the nascent Baathist empire.
Israel was slated for annhilation by the BAATHIST
CULT------but fought back and survived. dingy wept

So your argument is that it was a continuing war and Israel must still occupy those lands, why?

 

[Indeependent]

I understand that you are upset because there is no moral argument to be made for the continuing occupation so you need to lash out at me, but that's only harming your soul.

Being threatened by your mortal enemy right after winning a war is reason enough to remove their strategic ground.

 

[irosie91]

In 1967 Israel used a different method to expand their boundaries.

what "method" was that? what boundaries?
Do you know what a TRUCE LINE is?

 

[ding]

Israel was not threatened by the Palestinians after Israel defeated the 5 Arab armies; Israel was threatened by every one of those nations.

So there is no concern about their safety if they give back the lands they took in 1967.

 

[Indeependent]

So your argument is that it was a continuing war and Israel must still occupy those lands, why?

Are you retarded?
Are you even reading my posts?

 

[Indeependent]

So there is no concern about their safety if they give back the lands they took in 1967.

Being that Arabs start wars with each other all the time I would hesitate to yield ground.

 

[ding]

Being threatened by your mortal enemy right after winning a war is reason enough to remove their strategic ground.

Sure. But not decades later. That's the point. The initial occupation was justified. Today's occupation is not.

 

[ding]

Are you retarded?
Are you even reading my posts?

Yes, I am. Are you reading mine.

The initial occupation was justified. The current occupation is not.

 

[Indeependent]

Sure. But not decades later. That's the point. The initial occupation was justified. Today's occupation is not.

Do you follow the Middle East?
Are you retarded?
Do you realize how Arab countries are murdering their own citizens?

 

[ding]

Being that Arabs start wars with each other all the time I would hesitate to yield ground.

There is no risk from the Palestinians and the buffer they provide offers no strategic value.