Is the New BS GOP treasonous? Totally brainwashed, misinformed/out of control...

[JimH52]

Just how nuts are these Alr Righters? They are determined to allow Putin to help choose our next President. THAT IS TREASON!

 

[BlindBoo]

They have becoming a puppet of Brietphart. Look at how fast the Trump Campaign parrots the Brietphart news. They were tipped off about the release of the new phony investigation, spurred on by a RWNJ's book.

We need a special prosecutor to look into the highly partisan nature of the FBI and clean house.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Treasonous. Interesting.

I heard a local conservative radio talk show host yesterday say it was treasonous to not vote for Trump.

I thought that was nuts and a little scary, too.

The ends of the spectrum are killing us. So damn many of their behaviors are so damn similar.
.

No you didn't.

 

[Grizz]

The hate/bs conspiracy nutjobs Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

Let’s take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the Bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the Bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.

And then it turns out that these agents are basing their investigation on a book called “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute, an organization co-founded and chaired by Steve Bannon. Who is the CEO of the Trump campaign.

While the “imagine if the other side was doing this” argument can sometimes sound trite, in this case it’s more than apt. Imagine if a group of FBI agents were leaking damaging information on Donald Trump in violation of longstanding departmental policy, and it turned out that they were basing their innuendo on a book published by the Center for American Progress, which Clinton campaign chair John Podesta founded and used to run. Republicans would be crying bloody murder, and I’m pretty sure the entire news media would be backing them up every step of the way.

[Former CIA chief: Trump is Russia’s useful fool]

It’s not that this kind of thing is completely unprecedented. When Bill Clinton was impeached, people talked about “the criminalization of politics” — the idea that Republicans were trying to use the levers of the justice system as a means to prevail in what should be just ordinary political competition. George W. Bush’s administration fired a group of U.S. Attorneys because they were unwilling to pursue bogus voter fraud cases against Democrats or were too willing to investigate genuine corruption among Republican officials. There are cases like the absurd prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman, who has been in jail for years because he reappointed to a state health care board a man who had donated money to a lottery initiative Siegelman favored. And there was this guy named J. Edgar Hoover.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

But as he has in so many ways, Donald Trump takes every ugly impulse Republicans have and turns it up to 11, and just about the entire party follows him down. So now they are making it very clear that from literally the day Hillary Clinton is inaugurated, they will wage total war on her. There will be no rule or norm or standard of decency they won’t flout if it gets them a step closer to destroying her, no matter what the collateral damage.

It’s important to understand that strong institutions are what separate strong democracies from weak ones. In a strong democracy, one party can’t come into power and just lock up its opponents. It can’t turn the country’s law enforcement agencies into a partisan tool to destroy the other party. It can’t say that the courts will function only at its pleasure. We have the world’s most stable system not just because there aren’t tanks in the streets on election day, but because we have institutions that are strong enough to restrain the venality of individual men and women. And now, Republicans are not even pretending that those institutions should be impartial and transcend partisanship. They’re saying, if we can use them to destroy our opponents, we will. Something is seriously breaking down.

[Here’s how you destroy a democratic republic]

And please, spare me any explanations for this phenomenon that rely on how “divided” Americans are. Are we divided? Sure. But there’s only one party that is so vigorously undermining core democratic institutions in this way. You may not like what Democrats stand for, but they aren’t engaging in widespread official vote suppression, chanting that should their candidate win her opponent should be tossed in jail, promising to prevent any Republican president from filling vacancies on the Supreme Court, suggesting that they’ll try to impeach their opponent as soon as he takes office, cheering when a hostile foreign power hacks into American electronic systems, and trying to use the FBI to win the election.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.

Derp derp derp pub bot derp derp derp dupe derp derp derp.
Moron.

 

[Rustic]

The hate/bs conspiracy nutjobs Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

Let’s take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the Bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the Bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.

And then it turns out that these agents are basing their investigation on a book called “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute, an organization co-founded and chaired by Steve Bannon. Who is the CEO of the Trump campaign.

While the “imagine if the other side was doing this” argument can sometimes sound trite, in this case it’s more than apt. Imagine if a group of FBI agents were leaking damaging information on Donald Trump in violation of longstanding departmental policy, and it turned out that they were basing their innuendo on a book published by the Center for American Progress, which Clinton campaign chair John Podesta founded and used to run. Republicans would be crying bloody murder, and I’m pretty sure the entire news media would be backing them up every step of the way.

[Former CIA chief: Trump is Russia’s useful fool]

It’s not that this kind of thing is completely unprecedented. When Bill Clinton was impeached, people talked about “the criminalization of politics” — the idea that Republicans were trying to use the levers of the justice system as a means to prevail in what should be just ordinary political competition. George W. Bush’s administration fired a group of U.S. Attorneys because they were unwilling to pursue bogus voter fraud cases against Democrats or were too willing to investigate genuine corruption among Republican officials. There are cases like the absurd prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman, who has been in jail for years because he reappointed to a state health care board a man who had donated money to a lottery initiative Siegelman favored. And there was this guy named J. Edgar Hoover.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

But as he has in so many ways, Donald Trump takes every ugly impulse Republicans have and turns it up to 11, and just about the entire party follows him down. So now they are making it very clear that from literally the day Hillary Clinton is inaugurated, they will wage total war on her. There will be no rule or norm or standard of decency they won’t flout if it gets them a step closer to destroying her, no matter what the collateral damage.

It’s important to understand that strong institutions are what separate strong democracies from weak ones. In a strong democracy, one party can’t come into power and just lock up its opponents. It can’t turn the country’s law enforcement agencies into a partisan tool to destroy the other party. It can’t say that the courts will function only at its pleasure. We have the world’s most stable system not just because there aren’t tanks in the streets on election day, but because we have institutions that are strong enough to restrain the venality of individual men and women. And now, Republicans are not even pretending that those institutions should be impartial and transcend partisanship. They’re saying, if we can use them to destroy our opponents, we will. Something is seriously breaking down.

[Here’s how you destroy a democratic republic]

And please, spare me any explanations for this phenomenon that rely on how “divided” Americans are. Are we divided? Sure. But there’s only one party that is so vigorously undermining core democratic institutions in this way. You may not like what Democrats stand for, but they aren’t engaging in widespread official vote suppression, chanting that should their candidate win her opponent should be tossed in jail, promising to prevent any Republican president from filling vacancies on the Supreme Court, suggesting that they’ll try to impeach their opponent as soon as he takes office, cheering when a hostile foreign power hacks into American electronic systems, and trying to use the FBI to win the election.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.

Steve Schmidt said it very well.

He's a progressive nutjob, spineless to the core...

 

[Mac1958]

I heard a local conservative radio talk show host yesterday say it was treasonous to not vote for Trump..

No you didn't.

Oh yes, I did.

And just for you, I googled "vote hillary treason" and found these on the first page:

• A Vote For Treason | Zero Hedge
• TL Davis: A Vote Of Treason
• How Can Anyone Vote for Hillary with All The Proof of Treason? Or Do you Not care About the USA ?
• Voting Hillary Clinton An Act of Treason #1

Yer welcome!
.

 

[Rustic]

Just how nuts are these Alr Righters? They are determined to allow Putin to help choose our next President. THAT IS TREASON!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

 

[BlindBoo]

Treasonous. Interesting.

I heard a local conservative radio talk show host yesterday say it was treasonous to not vote for Trump.

I thought that was nuts and a little scary, too.

The ends of the spectrum are killing us. So damn many of their behaviors are so damn similar.
.

The choice is clear....to think otherwise is pretty scary and nuts....

You fence sitters are killing is. So damn many of your behaviors are so damn destructive....

The choice is clear. One way or another the Trumpettes are in the tank with Russia.

 

[owebo]

Treasonous. Interesting.

I heard a local conservative radio talk show host yesterday say it was treasonous to not vote for Trump.

I thought that was nuts and a little scary, too.

The ends of the spectrum are killing us. So damn many of their behaviors are so damn similar.
.

The choice is clear....to think otherwise is pretty scary and nuts....

You fence sitters are killing is. So damn many of your behaviors are so damn destructive....

The choice is clear. One way or another the Trumpettes are in the tank with Russia.

Crystal clear....

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The hate/bs conspiracy nutjobs Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

Let’s take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the Bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the Bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.

And then it turns out that these agents are basing their investigation on a book called “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute, an organization co-founded and chaired by Steve Bannon. Who is the CEO of the Trump campaign.

While the “imagine if the other side was doing this” argument can sometimes sound trite, in this case it’s more than apt. Imagine if a group of FBI agents were leaking damaging information on Donald Trump in violation of longstanding departmental policy, and it turned out that they were basing their innuendo on a book published by the Center for American Progress, which Clinton campaign chair John Podesta founded and used to run. Republicans would be crying bloody murder, and I’m pretty sure the entire news media would be backing them up every step of the way.

[Former CIA chief: Trump is Russia’s useful fool]

It’s not that this kind of thing is completely unprecedented. When Bill Clinton was impeached, people talked about “the criminalization of politics” — the idea that Republicans were trying to use the levers of the justice system as a means to prevail in what should be just ordinary political competition. George W. Bush’s administration fired a group of U.S. Attorneys because they were unwilling to pursue bogus voter fraud cases against Democrats or were too willing to investigate genuine corruption among Republican officials. There are cases like the absurd prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman, who has been in jail for years because he reappointed to a state health care board a man who had donated money to a lottery initiative Siegelman favored. And there was this guy named J. Edgar Hoover.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

But as he has in so many ways, Donald Trump takes every ugly impulse Republicans have and turns it up to 11, and just about the entire party follows him down. So now they are making it very clear that from literally the day Hillary Clinton is inaugurated, they will wage total war on her. There will be no rule or norm or standard of decency they won’t flout if it gets them a step closer to destroying her, no matter what the collateral damage.

It’s important to understand that strong institutions are what separate strong democracies from weak ones. In a strong democracy, one party can’t come into power and just lock up its opponents. It can’t turn the country’s law enforcement agencies into a partisan tool to destroy the other party. It can’t say that the courts will function only at its pleasure. We have the world’s most stable system not just because there aren’t tanks in the streets on election day, but because we have institutions that are strong enough to restrain the venality of individual men and women. And now, Republicans are not even pretending that those institutions should be impartial and transcend partisanship. They’re saying, if we can use them to destroy our opponents, we will. Something is seriously breaking down.

[Here’s how you destroy a democratic republic]

And please, spare me any explanations for this phenomenon that rely on how “divided” Americans are. Are we divided? Sure. But there’s only one party that is so vigorously undermining core democratic institutions in this way. You may not like what Democrats stand for, but they aren’t engaging in widespread official vote suppression, chanting that should their candidate win her opponent should be tossed in jail, promising to prevent any Republican president from filling vacancies on the Supreme Court, suggesting that they’ll try to impeach their opponent as soon as he takes office, cheering when a hostile foreign power hacks into American electronic systems, and trying to use the FBI to win the election.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.

Steve Schmidt said it very well.

He's a progressive nutjob, spineless to the core...

Thrown cleanly under the bus. You fools are running out of party members to malign.

 

[Rustic]

The hate/bs conspiracy nutjobs Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

Let’s take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the Bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the Bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.

And then it turns out that these agents are basing their investigation on a book called “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute, an organization co-founded and chaired by Steve Bannon. Who is the CEO of the Trump campaign.

While the “imagine if the other side was doing this” argument can sometimes sound trite, in this case it’s more than apt. Imagine if a group of FBI agents were leaking damaging information on Donald Trump in violation of longstanding departmental policy, and it turned out that they were basing their innuendo on a book published by the Center for American Progress, which Clinton campaign chair John Podesta founded and used to run. Republicans would be crying bloody murder, and I’m pretty sure the entire news media would be backing them up every step of the way.

[Former CIA chief: Trump is Russia’s useful fool]

It’s not that this kind of thing is completely unprecedented. When Bill Clinton was impeached, people talked about “the criminalization of politics” — the idea that Republicans were trying to use the levers of the justice system as a means to prevail in what should be just ordinary political competition. George W. Bush’s administration fired a group of U.S. Attorneys because they were unwilling to pursue bogus voter fraud cases against Democrats or were too willing to investigate genuine corruption among Republican officials. There are cases like the absurd prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman, who has been in jail for years because he reappointed to a state health care board a man who had donated money to a lottery initiative Siegelman favored. And there was this guy named J. Edgar Hoover.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

But as he has in so many ways, Donald Trump takes every ugly impulse Republicans have and turns it up to 11, and just about the entire party follows him down. So now they are making it very clear that from literally the day Hillary Clinton is inaugurated, they will wage total war on her. There will be no rule or norm or standard of decency they won’t flout if it gets them a step closer to destroying her, no matter what the collateral damage.

It’s important to understand that strong institutions are what separate strong democracies from weak ones. In a strong democracy, one party can’t come into power and just lock up its opponents. It can’t turn the country’s law enforcement agencies into a partisan tool to destroy the other party. It can’t say that the courts will function only at its pleasure. We have the world’s most stable system not just because there aren’t tanks in the streets on election day, but because we have institutions that are strong enough to restrain the venality of individual men and women. And now, Republicans are not even pretending that those institutions should be impartial and transcend partisanship. They’re saying, if we can use them to destroy our opponents, we will. Something is seriously breaking down.

[Here’s how you destroy a democratic republic]

And please, spare me any explanations for this phenomenon that rely on how “divided” Americans are. Are we divided? Sure. But there’s only one party that is so vigorously undermining core democratic institutions in this way. You may not like what Democrats stand for, but they aren’t engaging in widespread official vote suppression, chanting that should their candidate win her opponent should be tossed in jail, promising to prevent any Republican president from filling vacancies on the Supreme Court, suggesting that they’ll try to impeach their opponent as soon as he takes office, cheering when a hostile foreign power hacks into American electronic systems, and trying to use the FBI to win the election.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.

Steve Schmidt said it very well.

He's a progressive nutjob, spineless to the core...

Thrown cleanly under the bus. You fools are running out of party members to malign.

He was always a progressive, hell he campaigned for spineless McCain… LOL

 

[emilynghiem]

Treasonous. Interesting.

I heard a local conservative radio talk show host yesterday say it was treasonous to not vote for Trump.

I thought that was nuts and a little scary, too.

The ends of the spectrum are killing us. So damn many of their behaviors are so damn similar.
.

Dear Mac1958 they assume Clinton is guilty and anyone voting for that to go on is enabling and equally responsible for not stopping it.

Others see voting for Trump is voting for conservative Constitutionalists to get appt to Supreme Court instead of liberal interests bought and sold by Clinton Democrats to do party bidding instead of enforcing the law of land for ppl of all parties and beliefs.

So one will put the Constitution first . The other will keep putting political party interests before duty to the Constitution. And some call that treasonous. I'd say it's against the Code of Ethics for GOVT Service www.ethics-commission.net
It is abuse of govt power to put political beliefs of one's party and associates before public duty to citizens of all parties and beliefs equally and inclusively. It's unconstitutional by amendments 1 and 14 and violates civil rights against discrimination by creed. Whenever we let one party push beliefs through Congress and Courts to the exclusion of equal beliefs of other parties, we are equally responsible for conspiring to violate equal civil rights of the objectors. Only if convicted of a crime do ppl deserve to lose liberties. So it's our duty to confront those ppl or parties first, go through due process, and prove wrongs were done or beliefs violated. But we haven't done that. Ppl in both parties take shortcuts and try to elect ppl to office to force beliefs through that violate equal beliefs of others so it becomes a battle of coercion. Both sides are guilty of abuse.

The difference lies with Constitutionalists willing to call them both out. Not take sides and commit the same wrongs in an endless trap.

 

[francoHFW]

The hate/bs conspiracy nutjobs Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

Let’s take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the Bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the Bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.

And then it turns out that these agents are basing their investigation on a book called “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute, an organization co-founded and chaired by Steve Bannon. Who is the CEO of the Trump campaign.

While the “imagine if the other side was doing this” argument can sometimes sound trite, in this case it’s more than apt. Imagine if a group of FBI agents were leaking damaging information on Donald Trump in violation of longstanding departmental policy, and it turned out that they were basing their innuendo on a book published by the Center for American Progress, which Clinton campaign chair John Podesta founded and used to run. Republicans would be crying bloody murder, and I’m pretty sure the entire news media would be backing them up every step of the way.

[Former CIA chief: Trump is Russia’s useful fool]

It’s not that this kind of thing is completely unprecedented. When Bill Clinton was impeached, people talked about “the criminalization of politics” — the idea that Republicans were trying to use the levers of the justice system as a means to prevail in what should be just ordinary political competition. George W. Bush’s administration fired a group of U.S. Attorneys because they were unwilling to pursue bogus voter fraud cases against Democrats or were too willing to investigate genuine corruption among Republican officials. There are cases like the absurd prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman, who has been in jail for years because he reappointed to a state health care board a man who had donated money to a lottery initiative Siegelman favored. And there was this guy named J. Edgar Hoover.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

But as he has in so many ways, Donald Trump takes every ugly impulse Republicans have and turns it up to 11, and just about the entire party follows him down. So now they are making it very clear that from literally the day Hillary Clinton is inaugurated, they will wage total war on her. There will be no rule or norm or standard of decency they won’t flout if it gets them a step closer to destroying her, no matter what the collateral damage.

It’s important to understand that strong institutions are what separate strong democracies from weak ones. In a strong democracy, one party can’t come into power and just lock up its opponents. It can’t turn the country’s law enforcement agencies into a partisan tool to destroy the other party. It can’t say that the courts will function only at its pleasure. We have the world’s most stable system not just because there aren’t tanks in the streets on election day, but because we have institutions that are strong enough to restrain the venality of individual men and women. And now, Republicans are not even pretending that those institutions should be impartial and transcend partisanship. They’re saying, if we can use them to destroy our opponents, we will. Something is seriously breaking down.

[Here’s how you destroy a democratic republic]

And please, spare me any explanations for this phenomenon that rely on how “divided” Americans are. Are we divided? Sure. But there’s only one party that is so vigorously undermining core democratic institutions in this way. You may not like what Democrats stand for, but they aren’t engaging in widespread official vote suppression, chanting that should their candidate win her opponent should be tossed in jail, promising to prevent any Republican president from filling vacancies on the Supreme Court, suggesting that they’ll try to impeach their opponent as soon as he takes office, cheering when a hostile foreign power hacks into American electronic systems, and trying to use the FBI to win the election.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.

Derp derp derp pub bot derp derp derp dupe derp derp derp.
Moron.

Everything you know is wrong, brainwashed FUNCTIONAL moron.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

It warms my heart knowing Franco is going into these last few days before the election, very very nervous.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Poor little haterpubdupes is going off the deep end.

He's so convinced that he's right and Republicans are wrong, despite massive evidence to the contrary, that he's making up "total war" and other hysterical accusations against them rather than consider that, just maybe, he's the one who's wrong.

That's what comes from these hysterical screamers, I guess.

 

[francoHFW]

It warms my heart knowing Franco is going into these last few days before the election, very very nervous.

That's what you hater dupes are good for. "No compromise, un-American TP GOP"- TIME. Keep voting for your greedy, lying scumbag GOP billionaires, fool.

The only real question is whether there will be any GOPers who will respect the great American traditions of good gov't under President Hilllary Clinton's administration.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Is the New BS GOP treasonous? Totally brainwashed, misinformed/out of control..

The Force is weak in this one.

You can smell the Fear and Desperation on Democrats like the chlorinated musk stench of a decadent LibTard bathhouse and opium den.

Their noses are so far up each others asses that they're sniffin' tonsils...

Unfortunately, I'm stuck voting for their corrupt standard bearer, given the insane nature of the alternative, but it's still damned funny to watch.

If you believe the world's best charity is a slush fund after numerous investigations...

The investigation is not done yet, it looks very bad .

.

 

[francoHFW]

Poor little haterpubdupes is going off the deep end.

He's so convinced that he's right and Republicans are wrong, despite massive evidence to the contrary, that he's making up "total war" and other hysterical accusations against them rather than consider that, just maybe, he's the one who's wrong.

That's what comes from these hysterical screamers, I guess.

I'll go with the US justice system and facts. (Hilary cleared of all your conspiracy accusations already duh) "I know, a tax cut for the rich"- Big Orange idiot.

The New BS GOP has been practicing total war for 30 years. Based on garbage propaganda, dupe. Only getting worse.

 

[Wyatt earp]

They have becoming a puppet of Brietphart. Look at how fast the Trump Campaign parrots the Brietphart news. They were tipped off about the release of the new phony investigation, spurred on by a RWNJ's book.

We need a special prosecutor to look into the highly partisan nature of the FBI and clean house.

I always feel like I am watching sesame street with liberals, they always give us these new words just in the past 8 years a learned about Progressive, lgbt, vetted and now Alt right....lnao

 

[francoHFW]

Is the New BS GOP treasonous? Totally brainwashed, misinformed/out of control..

The Force is weak in this one.

You can smell the Fear and Desperation on Democrats like the chlorinated musk stench of a decadent LibTard bathhouse and opium den.

Their noses are so far up each others asses that they're sniffin' tonsils...

Unfortunately, I'm stuck voting for their corrupt standard bearer, given the insane nature of the alternative, but it's still damned funny to watch.

If you believe the world's best charity is a slush fund after numerous investigations...

The investigation is not done yet, it looks very bad .

.

Ony in duped New BS GOP world, Putin lover. It's an evil, un-American joke witch hunt just like all the others, dupe.