ihopehefails
VIP Member
- Oct 3, 2009
- 3,384
- 228
- 83
- Banned
- #1
I believe that the three branches of government are separate and equal to each other which means that the executive branch can't tell the judicial branch on how to interpret the constitution but this being said does the judicial branch have a right to tell the executive branch on how to uphold the constitution? For example: Lets say an executive decides to veto certain provisions of a budget that he believes are unconstitutional but the judicial branch says he can't do this. They do not have the right to tell the executive branch on how to 'uphold the constitution' as they see fit anymore than the executive branch has the right to tell the judicial branch on how they should uphold the constitution.
My point is is that the judicial branch doesn't have the final say over the other two branches of government.
My point is is that the judicial branch doesn't have the final say over the other two branches of government.