People on the Right, like me, have one problem re. Ukraine: Putin fired the first shot. And no matter how much you may have been provoked by your opponent, if you fire the first shot, you lose a lot of moral authority.
It's why we worked to make the Japanese fire the first shot before WWII.
Plus, like the fellow in the Irish joke responding to a request for directions to Dublin, we have to say, Well, we wouldn't have started from here.
American policy re. Russia in general and Ukraine in particular has a thirty-year history, and a bad one. No time to go into it all over again here. For a short briefing, look here:
[
The First US Onslaught to “Weaken” Post-Cold War Russia. ]
So, now we're like people who have been kibbitizing a bad chess player ... "No, no ... don't put your rook in front of your queen! ... Look, move there and fork him! No , no ..." and at the 11th move, when he's three pieces down and his opponent controls the center of the board, the exasperated bad player turns to us and says, "Okay, smart guy ... you take over!"
But ... regardless of the rights and wrongs of the war in Ukraine, there are indeed people on the Right who have, or had, some admiration for Vladimir Putin.
Not because they're fascist/authoritarians and so is he -- that's just an idiot-liberal mind-fart -- but because he is resisting what they see as unacceptable New World Order/Globalism in general, and the cultural destruction of his country in particular. (There is a close analogy with the Old Left here: the Old Left, in its majority, admired Stalin and Mao. Not because they were a ruthless authoritarians -- there were plenty of those on the Right, as well, whom they did not admire -- , but because they saw them using their ruthless authoritarianism in the service of socialism and national liberation, something they supported.)
This case is made in more detail here, in the negative: the real reason liberals got angry at Putin: [ https:// richardhanania.substack.com/p/russia-as-the-great-satan-in-the ]
And of course there is the 'payback-time' factor: you called Trump a Russian agent, so we'll call Biden a Ukrainian agent ... and raise you one by saying he's also bought by China. (I think all such accusations were/are largely garbage, but each had enough truth to them to give them traction among the partisan.)
Another strain of thinking -- sort of 'thinking' -- on the Right is: why give our money to Ukraine, we need it here. Not an entirely wrong reflex, but the basic principle implied is: it is never ever right to spend money supporting one side in a war abroad. So we shouldn't have given 50 destroyers to the British when they -- but not yet us -- were fighting Hitler, or supported the Chinese Nationalists against the Japanese militarists.
And, finally, there is indeed a small, but coherent, tendency -- on the 'Right' in some sense, although not welcomed by us -- which does indeed like the authoritarian character of the current Russian government as such, likes its nationalism, likes its supposed Christianity, etc.
However, these people have one little problem: Russia is justifying its war in ANTI-fascist terms. The most open, self-avowed fascists in this conflict are the extreme Ukrainian nationalists, like the swastika-admiring Azov Batallion. A dilemma for them.
These are the people you see slyly referring to the 'Khazarian Mafia', or a 'genetically-related group', etc (ie, the Jews), as behind the whole thing. They are to us as those people -- if they're still any left -- who held up Hoxha's ultra-Stalinist Albania
[ which was a kind of socialist Haiti ] as the very peak of social progress, are to the Left.