Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 83,025
- 41,531
- 2,615
And who controlled the Warsaw Pact?Correction: NATO was created to oppose the Warsaw Pact, not Russia.
Yeah
Russia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And who controlled the Warsaw Pact?Correction: NATO was created to oppose the Warsaw Pact, not Russia.
NATO is not dead. US membership in it is dead.
COrrection: NATO was formed 6 years before to defend itself against the Soviet Union.Correction: NATO was created to oppose the Warsaw Pact, not Russia.
Wrong! The US is solidly committed to a war with Russia.The Zelenski meeting with President Trump served to clarify several issues:
1. The US is not committed to a war with Russia over Ukraine.
The US can only settle with a win, and likewise Russia too.2. The US would like to see a peaceful settlement, but that is up to Zelenski.
The US aid will be delivered but Trump can pretend that it won't, as long as he's alive.3. If Zelenski refuses a peaceful settlement, the US will withdraw its military aid to Ukraine.
4. Ukraine is not a member of NATO and is not a subject of NATO's mutual defense provisions.
5. If other NATO members wish to fight in Ukraine, they do so at their own peril.
This raises the question of whether the efficacy of NATO, which was originally intended to provide mutual (i.e., US) defense against an attack by Russia on member countries. If some of these countries now want to attack Russia, they have contravened NATO's original purpose and turned it into a pretentious European debate club.
The US won't run away defeated from this war. But Russia won't accept defeat either.If there is any consensus about European policy towards Ukraine and Russia, it should be formulated and applied by the European Union, not NATO. That being said, what purpose does NATO serve, other than bureaucratic entanglement in the foreign affairs of other countries?
Oh look… the Kremlin troll speaksWrong! The US is solidly committed to a war with Russia.
But it never has been over the Ukraine.
The US can only settle with a win, and likewise Russia too.
The US aid will be delivered but Trump can pretend that it won't, as long as he's alive.
No! Nato has always been a tool for US aggression, and that will continue.
The US won't run away defeated from this war. But Russia won't accept defeat either.
CORRECTION: NATO was created to oppose the USSR in 1949. The Warsaw Pact didn't exist until 1955. Educate yourself moron. SMFH, desert rats that spend too much time in the sun shouldn't be posting.Correction: NATO was created to oppose the Warsaw Pact, not Russia.
That is one of the dumbest statements I've seen here.It will take decades to repair the damage to our country's reputation because of what Felon47 has done.
CHina just watched the US abandon its military partner on live tv.That is one of the dumbest statements I've seen here.
The Zelenski meeting with President Trump served to clarify several issues:
1. The US is not committed to a war with Russia over Ukraine.
2. The US would like to see a peaceful settlement, but that is up to Zelenski.
3. If Zelenski refuses a peaceful settlement, the US will withdraw its military aid to Ukraine.
4. Ukraine is not a member of NATO and is not a subject of NATO's mutual defense provisions.
5. If other NATO members wish to fight in Ukraine, they do so at their own peril.
This raises the question of whether the efficacy of NATO, which was originally intended to provide mutual (i.e., US) defense against an attack by Russia on member countries. If some of these countries now want to attack Russia, they have contravened NATO's original purpose and turned it into a pretentious European debate club.
If there is any consensus about European policy towards Ukraine and Russia, it should be formulated and applied by the European Union, not NATO. That being said, what purpose does NATO serve, other than bureaucratic entanglement in the foreign affairs of other countries?
China would have likely tuned out of Trump's sideshow, halfway through. They would have never believed that the Ukraine was ever a part of it.CHina just watched the US abandon its military partner on live tv.
Then it's dead because since NATO was established the US IS NATONATO is not dead. US membership in it is dead.
Actually not Russia but the Soviet Union, the Warsaw pact was established some five years after NATO.Correction: NATO was created to oppose the Warsaw Pact, not Russia.
Yes, you're right, thanks.Actually not Russia but the Soviet Union, the Warsaw pact was established some five years after NATO.
Poland‘s not getting involved with troops on the ground and they’re not gonna be giving up much money get it through your head.Poland and Germany and Ukraine and Lithuania will bond more closely.
Finland and Sweden may as well.
The rest are going to pressure Hungary and offer boodles of support to Turkey.
Poland is building the largest armored force Europe has seen since the Warsaw pact.Then it's dead because since NATO was established the US IS NATO