Is it possible to clone a dinosaur? Live Science

[Dalia]

Yea only 60 million years of reversal needed

Jesus

I know, a piece of cake since there is a dino in every bird:

The idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs has been around since the 19th century, when scientists discovered the fossil of an early bird called Archaeopteryx. It had wings and feathers, but it also looked a lot like a dinosaur. More recent fossils look similar.

But these early birds didn't look the same as modern ones. In particular, they didn't have beaks: they had snouts, like those of their dinosaur ancestors.

To understand how one changed into another, a team has been tampering with the molecular processes that make up a beak in chickens.

By doing so, they have managed to create a chicken embryo with a dinosaur-like snout and palate, similar to that of small feathered dinosaurs like Velociraptor. The results are published in the journal Evolution.

The team's aim was to understand how the bird beak evolved, because the beak is such a vital part of bird anatomy. It has been crucial for their success. The 10,000 or more bird species occupy a wide range of habitats, and many have specialised beaks to help them survive.​

In fact junk DNA might make this possible, but why would anyone want to go back to the inferior life forms

Dinosaurs survived for almost 180 million years. I would say they were very successful and anything but inferior.

They became to big

 

[alang1216]

They became to big

So what happened to the small dinos?

 

[Dalia]

They became to big

So what happened to the small dinos?

Nothing, Most dinosaurs were large.

 

[Frannie]

They became to big

So what happened to the small dinos?

Nothing, Most dinosaurs were large.

Nope many were very small, large bones last longer to get fossilized though

 

[alang1216]

They became to big

So what happened to the small dinos?

Nothing, Most dinosaurs were large.

The little ones just flew away? Oh yeah, they did.

 

[james bond]

The little ones just flew away? Oh yeah, they did.

Just making assertions to fit your stupid hypothesis. It has nothing to do with the subject.

You can't clone because they're too old? The atheist scientists tried to reverse engineer one last year.

Now, you're telling us the little ones just flew away. Just what flew away? Where did they go? Why did the dinosaurs die in graveyards near water scattered throughout the world? You really have no science behind your bird brain.

 

[alang1216]

The little ones just flew away? Oh yeah, they did.

Just making assertions to fit your stupid hypothesis. It has nothing to do with the subject.

You can't clone because they're too old? The atheist scientists tried to reverse engineer one last year.

Now, you're telling us the little ones just flew away. Just what flew away? Where did they go? Why did the dinosaurs die in graveyards near water scattered throughout the world? You really have no science behind your bird brain.

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

As to the graveyards, some dinos almost certainly did seasonal migrations like the wildebeest of Africa today. When the wildebeest herd crosses a flooded stream some will drown and their carcasses can collect down river and get rapidly buried.

 

[james bond]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood,

False.

Go pinch off this steaming pile in the religious section. There is no place for you, here.

 

[james bond]

The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood,

False.

Go pinch off this steaming pile in the religious section. There is no place for you, here.

Like I said, atheists are usually wrong. What about the atheist religion and evolution? Now, that's a steaming pile of feces and it has no place in either science or religious section. Do we have a lying section? They you could have your own section. It could be named after you.

The following is from the source you said I should use.

"Weren’t dinosaurs extinct long before the Flood?
No. The belief that dinosaurs died out long before man is an evolutionary idea. In Genesis we see that God made all the land-dwelling creatures on Day Six of creation week about 6,000 years ago. That included dinosaurs, since they were land animals. He made Adam and Eve on the same day.

There is strong scientific evidence that the dinosaurs were not millions of years old. Scientists have found soft tissue, proteins, and DNA in dino bones, but this should have all disintegrated in a fraction of the time.

In Job chapter 40 (after the Flood) the description of behemoth with a tail like a cedar, the biggest tree of the middle east only matches an animal like a sauropod dinosaur. So behemoth’s ancestors must have been on board the Ark, therefore dinosaurs were alive after the Flood."

Noahs Flood - creation.com

World's Largest Dinosaur Graveyard Linked to Mass Death

We also have the Earth 3/4 covered with water and marine fossils on top of Mt. Everest and the Himalayas. Much marine fossils found on mountain tops.

 

[james bond]

So far cloning has been limited to living animals as what is needed is not just the DNA, but living embryo cells. The latter is what creation scientists say. Secular or atheist scientists think they can bring back extinct animals, but we're not going to get any explanations from Fort Fun Indiana.

 

[Hollie]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

There is no evidence to suggest that dinosaurs went extinct as a result of a global flood 6,000 years ago.

There is overwhelmingly evidence that dinosaurs roamed the planet for millions of years across the planet that is billions of years old.

Religious extremists have no evidence to refute the above.

 

[Hollie]

So far cloning has been limited to living animals as what is needed is not just the DNA, but living embryo cells. The latter is what creation scientists say. Secular or atheist scientists think they can bring back extinct animals, but we're not going to get any explanations from Fort Fun Indiana.

Religious extremists say many things that are false.

Religious extremists do no research or publish in peer reviewed journals. That's why religious extremists are not taken seriously regarding science matters.

 

[Hollie]

The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood,

False.

Go pinch off this steaming pile in the religious section. There is no place for you, here.

Like I said, atheists are usually wrong. What about the atheist religion and evolution? Now, that's a steaming pile of feces and it has no place in either science or religious section. Do we have a lying section? They you could have your own section. It could be named after you.

The following is from the source you said I should use.

"Weren’t dinosaurs extinct long before the Flood?
No. The belief that dinosaurs died out long before man is an evolutionary idea. In Genesis we see that God made all the land-dwelling creatures on Day Six of creation week about 6,000 years ago. That included dinosaurs, since they were land animals. He made Adam and Eve on the same day.

There is strong scientific evidence that the dinosaurs were not millions of years old. Scientists have found soft tissue, proteins, and DNA in dino bones, but this should have all disintegrated in a fraction of the time.

In Job chapter 40 (after the Flood) the description of behemoth with a tail like a cedar, the biggest tree of the middle east only matches an animal like a sauropod dinosaur. So behemoth’s ancestors must have been on board the Ark, therefore dinosaurs were alive after the Flood."

Noahs Flood - creation.com

World's Largest Dinosaur Graveyard Linked to Mass Death

We also have the Earth 3/4 covered with water and marine fossils on top of Mt. Everest and the Himalayas. Much marine fossils found on mountain tops.

Cutting and pasting from creation.com regarding science matters is silly. They are religious extremists with predefined conclusions.

What we believe - creation.com

 

[alang1216]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

Sorry but there is no evidence of a global flood, unless you consider changes in sea levels to be floods. Why were only dinos killed off in the flood?

 

[progressive hunter]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

Sorry but there is no evidence of a global flood, unless you consider changes in sea levels to be floods. Why were only dinos killed off in the flood?

youre either an ignorant fool or a liar,,,

there is evidence all over the world of a global flood,,its just that your religion rejects them

 

[Hollie]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

Sorry but there is no evidence of a global flood, unless you consider changes in sea levels to be floods. Why were only dinos killed off in the flood?

youre either an ignorant fool or a liar,,,

there is evidence all over the world of a global flood,,its just that your religion rejects them

Not surprisingly, ID'iot creationists / Flat Earthers never can supply that evidence "all over the world".

 

[alang1216]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

Sorry but there is no evidence of a global flood, unless you consider changes in sea levels to be floods. Why were only dinos killed off in the flood?

youre either an ignorant fool or a liar,,,

there is evidence all over the world of a global flood,,its just that your religion rejects them

Really? Please point me to the evidence.

 

[progressive hunter]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

Sorry but there is no evidence of a global flood, unless you consider changes in sea levels to be floods. Why were only dinos killed off in the flood?

youre either an ignorant fool or a liar,,,

there is evidence all over the world of a global flood,,its just that your religion rejects them

Really? Please point me to the evidence.

I have many times,,,and as I said you reject them

 

[alang1216]

Hey, I thought it was funny, I didn't think anyone would take it literally. What do I know?

Nah. Atheists are too wrong to be funny. They believe in the stupidest things. The dinosaurs were mass killed from a global flood, but so far, I think most successes with cloning has been with living species. However, scientists are trying to bring back extinct species through cloning. I'm not sure if they've succeeded.

Sorry but there is no evidence of a global flood, unless you consider changes in sea levels to be floods. Why were only dinos killed off in the flood?

youre either an ignorant fool or a liar,,,

there is evidence all over the world of a global flood,,its just that your religion rejects them

Really? Please point me to the evidence.

I have many times,,,and as I said you reject them

I don't recall your evidence but, if I rejected it, it must have been less than convincing. Evidence is not convincing just because YOUR religion accepts it.