- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,045
- 47,224
- 2,180
The farcical nature of much of the "Trump News" is quite transparent, and is even starting to be recognized by the Leftist masses. I have read a couple articles by Leftist commentators over the past few days chiding reporters for being so transparent in their TDS.
What is missing from essentially all news reporting about Trump is some mention of Trump's side of the case in point. For example, it was reported that Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Paris climate accord (particulars not relevant). It was further reported that almost every nation in the world disagreed with this action. NOT A SINGLE WORD WAS WRITTEN ABOUT THE LOGICAL AND FACTUAL REASONS WHY TRUMP TOOK THE ACTIONS HE DID. Was the accord tilted in favor of China and India? Did it subject us to paying penalties for relatively harmless technical violations? Is there any credible evidence that making the sacrifices called for in the treaty will MEASURABLY IMPACT THE FUTURE CLIMATE, given what China, India, and other third-world countries are permitted to do under the accord? Is this a treaty that must be ratified by the Senate, and if so, why didn't O'Bama submit it for ratification? It's not all that complicated.
Let the readers decide for themselves whether Trump is right or wrong, but at least explain Trump's position(s) while you are constantly calling them stupid and evil.
And if you, the Journalist, don't understand the reasons, make a few phone calls, have it explained to you, and report it.
On point of fact, articles about pulling out of the Paris Accord did exactly that. They explained Trump’s reasons for pulling out of the Accord and then pointed out the fallacies in that reasoning.
When did fake news media "journalists" ever point out the fallacies in Obama's reasoning? Answer: never. A journalist is someone who reports the news. He doesn't express his opinion about the news.
Just like criticism of his NATO speech in Brussels pointed out why Macron, Merkel and others were openly laughing at Trump’s stupidity in claiming millions were owed to the US.
Did it point out how they cried like little babies when Trump said wemight cut funding for NATO if these moocher nations did start paying their share? Of course not. They turned themselves into propaganda organs for socialist European politicians. That's what makes them fake news.
The negative coverage Trump receives always explains why he’s wrong in his assertions and his decisions and what the possible consequences could be.
In other words, it's fake news.
You’re the snowflake who’s crying “fake news” at every turn. Trump never threatened to cut defenders spending, and the European leaders know that. Republican administrations NEVER, ever cut defence spending - they increase it. In fact, Trump has promised to increase defence spending, bigly.
The whole point of NATO was to keep Germany weak and defenceless, while protecting Europe from further encroachment by the communists.
Thanks to Trump, the Germans are now arming themselves again. On top of which, Trump gave Putin a free hand in Syria and the Crimea.
Stupid is as stupid does.
What the hell is "defenders spending?" Trump threatened to cut US spending on NATO, not our defense spending, retard. Threating is not the same as actually doing. You're also wrong about the purpose of NATO. it was to help Europe defend itself about the Soviet Union, not to keep Germany defenseless. Your claim that Trump gave Putin a free hand in the Crimea is just another snowflake conspiricy theory. It's not like the US can do anything about Crimea at this point.
To sum up, every claim of your post is a lie. But when is that ever not the case?