frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 47,484
- 10,517
- 2,030
I've already answered this in another thread but that's OK. Once again, I totally disagree with you about queer marriage not hurting people or having a negative impact on people. It does just that to ALL the American people by setting a cultural standard based on a mentally deranged sexual perversion. This is grossly harmful to the whole nation, and especially to children, who thereby would be (and in 20 states ARE) wrongfully influenced to accept this lunacy. Of course it's harmful.
There is a not an infringement of equal protections of the law, because we're not talking about people who are equal. They are NOT EQUAL. One group are normal heterosexuals. The other are abnormal homosexuals. Unequal groups = unequal protection of the law.
It's similar to many other groups who also are unequal, and thereby don't get equal protection of the law either. Nothing unusual about that. People who are classified as insane are not allowed to adopt children (and may not even be free to walk the streets). Some people are not allowed to buy guns. Some are restricted from having drivers' licenses. Many are restricted from serving in the military. There are hundreds of examples of deprivation of rights, of which same sex marriage is only one in a long list. So what else is new ?
Okay, here's where I have a problem.
Firstly, we're dealing with the law.
Does the law say that gay people are about sexual perversion? No. So you don't have much ground to stand on there.
Second. Gay people have gay sex whether they are married or not married. You appear to be calling for a return to anti-sodomy laws.
Thirdly, how many STRAIGHT couples have anal sex and can still marry?
Fourthly, are you going to ask all people who want to get married if they have ever had anal sex before, or not?
Fifthly, you want a cultural standard. Is the US Constitution and Bill of Rights not a part of your cultural standard? Do you want the US to become more like Iran in terms of freedom and liberty?
Sixthly, you say they are not equal, well under the law they HAVE TO BE because there's a CONSTITUTION.
You're going for really, REALLY dangerous arguments, you know that.
Black people clearly aren't equal in the US, seeing as 25% are in poverty compared to 7% for white people. Does this mean you can treat them unequally as happened in the US for 90 years before 14A and 90 years after the 14A?
Do you really want archaic views of treatment of people to trump the US constitution? If so, can I suggest Saudi Arabia where women, clearly not equal as they have breasts, are not treated equally and "God's law" or whatever the sheeite they go on about over there is followed strictly?
The other groups you refer to are the insane, who are found insane in a court of law and by DUE PROCESS are not allowed to do certain things.
Children don't have full rights and nor do they have full responsibilities because they are learning about how society works and are often not able to comprehend what is going on. However as they get older they get more rights and more responsibilities and more freedom.
Some people can't buy guns, yeah, people who have been found guilty, or incapable, under DUE PROCESS.
The same for driving licenses, or those who have proven they can't drive. But they can continue to take tests, though they CAN DRIVE on their own land, or on private land without the govt being able to do squat.
Those who can't serve in the military, which is a job, not a right so this is not eve valid. The valid point would be to serve in the militia, which IS a right under the 2A, ie, bear arms, and most men are already in the unorganised militia which was made in the Dick Act. Woman can choose to join.
So.........
Also the right is for the feds to not stop people before due process, and not for the states who should be able to stop people.
So, not of those groups you mentioned are anything like gay people who clearly haven't been found gay by due process and there is no law to make people guilty of being gay under due process anyway, so all of your groups are meaningless and you can't stop gay people that way.
So that's what's new, for you at least.