Is common since a genetic trait found in our DNA

watchingfromafar

Gold Member
Aug 6, 2017
5,445
1,310
140
Is common since found as a genetic trait found in our DNA
DNA_Structure+Key+Labelled.pn_NoBB.png (3024×3000) (wikimedia.org)
1627772331812.png


In the above is the imprint of our creator,
.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,..,& What created the rest

In there.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., is what separates us from the rest
We are keeping our selves alive not only by using our instincts; but by our moral values.

If we loose them, all is lost
what do you think-?

Couldn’t a supercomputer compute this in real time-?
Some can if programed with our instincts---(may be)

Instinct, an inborn impulse or motivation to action typically performed in response to specific external stimuli. Today instinct is generally described as a stereotyped, apparently unlearned, genetically determined behaviour pattern.
Defining instinct


As one to another, instincts are not the only thing that is keeping us alive.

Jesus would tell you what is, if you only listed/listen with an open mind.

Or so it seems to me
How about you-? :)-
:)-
 
Last edited:
In my view, Christians follow the teaching of Jesus Christ

And one of the scribes came and heard them arguing, and recognizing that He had answered them well, asked Him, "What commandment is the foremost of all?" Jesus answered, "The foremost is, 'Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is one Lord; and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.' "The second is this, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no other commandment greater than these." (NAS, Mark 12:28-31)

"There is a saying, 'Love your friends and hate your enemies.' But I say: Love your enemies! Pray for those who persecute you! In that way you will be acting as true sons of your Father in heaven. For he gives his sunlight to both the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust too. If you love only those who love you, what good is that? Even scoundrels do that much. If you are friendly only to your friends, how are you different from anyone else? (TLB, Matthew 5:43-48)

"A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another." (NIV, John 13:34-35)


For if you give, you will get! Your gift will return to you in full and overflowing measure, pressed down, shaken together to make room for more, and running over. Whatever measure you use to give- large or small- will be used to measure what is given back to you." (TLB, Luke 6:38)

So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. (NIV, Matthew 7:12)

https://www.christianbiblereference.org/jneighbr.htm\

I’m a Christian because I too believe in those values :)-
 
Is common since is a genetic trait found in our DNA
DNA_Structure+Key+Labelled.pn_NoBB.png (3024×3000) (wikimedia.org)
View attachment 519740

In the above is the imprint of our creator,
.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,..,& What created the rest

In there.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., is what separates us from the rest
We are keeping our selves alive not only by using our instincts; but by our moral values.

If we loose them, all is lost
what do you think-?

Couldn’t a supercomputer compute this in real time-?
Some can if programed with our instincts---(may be)

Instinct, an inborn impulse or motivation to action typically performed in response to specific external stimuli. Today instinct is generally described as a stereotyped, apparently unlearned, genetically determined behaviour pattern.
Defining instinct


As one to another, instincts are not the only thing that is keeping us alive.

Jesus would tell you what is, if you only listed/listen with an open mind.

Or so it seems to me
How about you-? :)-
:)-
The God gene has been found and they are still searching for Motivation gene.
 
Thank God you are among the few,
uncommon to say the least
:)-

And unfortunately you blithering, brainless morons that can't even spell simple words correctly, or for that matter, even HAVE A CLUE that you don't know WHAT you are spelling is INCORRECT AND WRONG, are flooding this planet like cockroaches!!!

nintchdbpict000308601411.jpg

What YOU posted makes NO SENSE!!!


Figure THAT one out, moron!!
 
Last edited:
And unfortunately you blithering, brainless morons that can't even spell simple words correctly, or for that matter, even HAVE A CLUE that you don't know WHAT you are spelling is INCORRECT AND WRONG, are flooding this planet like cockroaches!!!

nintchdbpict000308601411.jpg

What YOU posted makes NO SENSE!!!


Figure THAT one out, moron!!


Scientists have been trying desperately to locate that gene as well.....
 
Uh, just us? Not the other great apes? What about humans 100,000 years ago? What about 300,000?
Humans are not descendants of the great ape.

Those apes still climb trees
Nothing has changed

1627841409771.png


Humans are unique and not related to the ape, period.
:)-
 
Brain size of human ancestors evolved gradually over 3 million years
Study of hominin fossils shows that brain size increased gradually and consistently, driven by evolution within populations, introduction of larger-brained species and extinction of smaller-brained ones

Brain size of human ancestors evolved gradually over 3 million years: Study of hominin fossils shows that brain size increased gradually and consistently, driven by evolution within populations, introduction of larger-brained species and extinction of smaller-brained ones -- ScienceDaily
1627841720557.png

:)-
 
Brain size of human ancestors evolved gradually over 3 million years
Study of hominin fossils shows that brain size increased gradually and consistently, driven by evolution within populations, introduction of larger-brained species and extinction of smaller-brained ones

Brain size of human ancestors evolved gradually over 3 million years: Study of hominin fossils shows that brain size increased gradually and consistently, driven by evolution within populations, introduction of larger-brained species and extinction of smaller-brained ones -- ScienceDaily
View attachment 520012
:)-
And the same reasons we know that are why we know all great apes had a common ancestor. You undermine your own arguments by presenting what we know about evolution.
 

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense​

Scientific American
John Rennie, Editor in Chief
June 2002.

"...For instance, evolution implies that between the earliest known ancestors of humans (roughly five million years old) and the appearance of anatomically modern humans (about 200,000 years ago), one should find a succession of hominin creatures with features progressively less apelike and more modern, which is indeed what the fossil record shows. But one should not—and does not—find modern human fossils embedded in strata from the Jurassic period (65 million years ago). Evolutionary biology routinely makes predictions far more refined and precise than this, and researchers test them constantly."..."
[......]
1627851341049.png

Fossil record shows a succession of hominins, with features becoming progressively less apelike and more modern. Credit: E. R. Degginer Science Source


`
 
Last edited:
Who Dat?
300,000 yrs ago?

Homo Naledi

1627852038718.png




And ie,

Wkipedia
...
Limbs
"...The metacarpals of the other fingers share adaptations with modern humans and Neanderthals to cup and manipulate objects, and the wrist joint is overall comparable to that of modern humans and Neanderthals. Conversely, the proximal phalanges are curved and are almost identical to those of A. afarensis and H. habilis, which is interpreted as an adaptation for climbing and suspensory behaviour. Such curvature is more pronounced in adults than juveniles, suggesting that adults climbed just as much or more so than juveniles, and this behaviour was commonly done. The fingers are also proportionally longer than those of any other fossil hominin (other than the arboreal Ardipithecus ramidus and a modern human specimen from Qafzeh cave, Israel) which is also consistent with climbing behaviour.[25]

H. naledi was a biped and stood upright.[5] Like other Homo, they had strong insertion for the gluteus muscles, well-defined linea aspera (a ridge running down the back of the femur), thick patellae, long tibiae, and gracile fibulae. These indicate that they were capable of long distance travel.[24] The H. naledi foot was similar to that of modern humans and other Homo, with adaptations for bipedalism and a humanlike gait. However, the heel bone has a low orientation, comparable to those of non-human great apes, and the ankle bone has a low declination, which possibly indicate the foot would have been subtly stiffer during the stance phase of walking before the foot pushed off the ground.[26]

....​

 
Uh, just us? Not the other great apes? What about humans 100,000 years ago? What about 300,000?
Common sense isn't so common. There was no 100,000 or 300,000 years ago. There are no fossil evidence and very little detail from the atheist scientists. Common sense is in the details. Recently, the atheists stole God's singularity and turned it into quantum mechanics singularity.
 

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense​

Scientific American
John Rennie, Editor in Chief
June 2002.

"...For instance, evolution implies that between the earliest known ancestors of humans (roughly five million years old) and the appearance of anatomically modern humans (about 200,000 years ago), one should find a succession of hominin creatures with features progressively less apelike and more modern, which is indeed what the fossil record shows. But one should not—and does not—find modern human fossils embedded in strata from the Jurassic period (65 million years ago). Evolutionary biology routinely makes predictions far more refined and precise than this, and researchers test them constantly."..."
[......]
View attachment 520048
Fossil record shows a succession of hominins, with features becoming progressively less apelike and more modern. Credit: E. R. Degginer Science Source


`
Your links are just atheist BS that has been floating around for years. We have no transitional fossils of apes to humans nor dinosaurs to birds. The funniest is the claim of we came from an ape-human instead of an ape. Lucy was show to be a chimpanzee. Yet, the ape-human has disappeared from the face of the planet and we only have apes today. It means the fossil record shows microevolution happened due to natural selection while macroevolution is a fairy tale to explain humans instead of them being created.

We had the smoking gun, but it somehow disappeared.

We've been waiting for you and the atheists to provide the evidence for many years now and still nothing. Let's just move on.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top