Do we really want a director of the FBI engaged in a partisan political matter? His initial comments went way beyond the scope of the investigation; after finding no crime had been done, he then engaged in character assassination of HRC. In fact, it is my opinion that Comey went far beyone misfeasance and is guilty of a crime, the abuse of power, i.e. malfeasance.
The first time he was grilled by congress, or when he sent a letter to congress the second time?
You really don't know what the hell you are talking about, do you?
FU. My comment was based on Comey's initial press conference. What he said to Congress or what was in a subsequent letter is not relevant to my post.
Well then, you live in an absolute bubble.
After his disgraceful testimony, and the disgraceful handling of the investigation, it is clear you haven't been paying attention.
Any imagined "character assassination" was more than warranted.
What other criminal gets an opportunity to destroy all the evidence of a crime before they are investigated?
And now you have the audacity to come on to this forum and whine to the membership how you think the head of the FBI might be bad mouthing your candidate a little bit, after he gives all her staff immunity from prosecution on the condition that they hand over everything they have that is pertinent to the case, (only after they have had a chance to delete any and all files that might show conduct unbecoming of a civil servant or future presidential candidate.)
Everyone knows what she did was wrong, it isn't a question of intent.
The fact that you are sitting here telling everyone that what she did was not wrong makes you look like an ignorant fool. Comey did not engage in character assassination, he was just telling it like it is. In fact, he made himself look complicit in the whole deal by agreeing to offer immunity to Clinton's staffers, allowing them time to destroy evidence, and then not charging her, and everyone under her with obstruction of justice makes the entire FBI look corrupt. The very fact that the Clinton staff destroyed evidence that was under subpoena PROVES criminal intent. He made himself look like a giant douche by claiming that there was no criminal intent.
Face it, YOUR THREAD HAS NO LEGS.
You have the intellectual heft of a Tasmanian gnat.
You can't come in here and tell us, "no, you can't consider anything else, just this one press conference." Go blow yourself. Who the hell do you think you are? If it went to an investigation or court, all evidence would be considered. We need to know how the investigation was conducted.
She is guilty. The FBI and DOJ covered for her. They used different rules for prosecuting the investigation, giving her time to cover up what she needed to cover up.
Now it comes out that her play-girl didn't cover up everything, and the FBI accidentally came across something that should have been covered up, and FBI agents that AREN'T friendly to Comey or Clinton found it.
And now you are all butt hurt.
Well, that just sucks, don't it? Get used to it, that's government corruption. I'm sure no matter who is elected, there is more of that where this came from.