Is Bondi blowing the Epstein Investigation intentionally?

a08f93.jpg
 
So this is being "reported" by "insiders", which means pretty much nothing. But here's hoping, anyway:

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders.
So the media hook is hoping to be baited up with Maxwell next I guess.

As if it hadn't already passed that threshold once before. Riddle me this batman - If Epstein was assassinated, then how did they miss Gislane Maxwell ? Makes absolutely no sense. She had to be just as knowledgeable as Epstien was on the operation. Sounds like the suicide was legitimately reported correctly if Maxwell survived this thing.

.
 
Epstein was arrested and died under the Trump Administration. If anyone wanted to bury or destroy the Epstein files, it was them. I will add that there are or were plenty of people who were worried about the release of Epstein's files, Trump chief among them.
No proof, but your TDS is inflamed 😂
 
Using the first three words only of the thread title would've been better.
 
15th post
Funny how you let Biden slide on Ukraine, and now Ukraine has suffered a great catastrophic war because of it, but nothing to see there right ?
Why on Earth would you lob out fallacious lies about me, when you had already stuck your foot in it?

All true.


But the point here? We promised Gorbechev we would not expand NATO. But we have. We purposely used the CIA to use these Neo-Nazis to subvert the democratically elected government to pose a risk to the Russian federation, when all they wanted was an East-West security pact. NATO and the EU have purposely been using Ukrainain Nazis both during the Soviet empire, and the post Soviet era, to try to destroy Russia, this is just a fact. And we have broken promises and purposely tried to provoke war with Russia, and now? The Deep State got what it wanted, while we squander billions of tax payer money on the ruling western oligarchs and their corruption.

:rolleyes:

US gov’t knew NATO expansion to Ukraine would force Russia to intervene​


WikiLeaks-Ukraine-NATO-Russia-intervene-William-Burns.jpg


WikiLeaks-Ukraine-NATO-Russia-William-Burns.jpg


". . . Ukraine and Georgia’s NATO aspirations not only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region. Not only does Russia perceive encirclement, and efforts to undermine Russia’s influence in the region, but it also fears unpredictable and uncontrolled consequences which would seriously affect Russian security interests. Experts tell us that Russia is particularly worried that the strong divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership, with much of the ethnic-Russian community against membership, could lead to a major split, involving violence or at worst, civil war. In that eventuality, Russia would have to decide whether to intervene; a decision Russia does not want to have to face.. . .

Burns’ warnings came true just a few years later.. . ."




The CIA knew what it was doing. . . it wanted war, and it got one.

iu



NATO should have never have been expanded. . . guarantees were given to Gorbachev, the west was NOT to be allowed to, and Putin is right. Nor were they allowed to place missiles in any of the new NATO members, which they have, since talks about the unification of Germany occurred.

quote-war-is-not-merely-a-political-act-but-a-real-political-instrument-a-continuation-of-carl-von-clausewitz-5-77-21.jpg


WAR IN EUROPE AND THE RISE OF RAW PROPAGANDA​

". . . Setting aside the manoeuvres and cynicism of geopolitics, whomever the players, this historical memory is the driving force behind Russia’s respect-seeking, self-protective security proposals, which were published in Moscow in the week the UN voted 130-2 to outlaw Nazism. They are:

- NATO guarantees that it will not deploy missiles in nations bordering Russia. (They are already in place from Slovenia to Romania, with Poland to follow)
  • NATO to stop military and naval exercises in nations and seas bordering Russia.
  • Ukraine will not become a member of NATO.
  • the West and Russia to sign a binding East-West security pact.
  • the landmark treaty between the US and Russia covering intermediate-range nuclear weapons to be restored. (The US abandoned it in 2019)


These amount to a comprehensive draft of a peace plan for all of post-war Europe and ought to be welcomed in the West. But who understands their significance in Britain? What they are told is that Putin is a pariah and a threat to Christendom.. . . "

Newly Declassified Documents: Gorbachev Told NATO Wouldn't Move Past East German Border​

". . .Gorbachev only accepted German reunification—over which the Soviet Union had a legal right to veto under treaty—because he received assurances that NATO would not expand after he withdrew his forces from Eastern Europe from James Baker, President George H.W. Bush, West German foreign minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher, West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, the CIA Director Robert Gates, French President Francois Mitterrand, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, British foreign minister Douglas Hurd, British Prime Minister John Major, and NATO secretary-general Manfred Woerner.

Indeed, as late as March 1991, the British were reassuring Gorbachev that they could not foresee circumstances under which NATO might expand into Eastern and Central Europe. As former British Ambassador to the Soviet Union recounted in March 5, 1991, Rodric Braithwaite, both British foreign minister Douglas Hurd and British Prime Minister John Major told the Soviet that NATO would not expand eastwards.

“I believe that your thoughts about the role of NATO in the current situation are the result of misunderstanding,” Major had told Gorbachev. We are not talking about strengthening of NATO. We are talking about the coordination of efforts that is already happening in Europe between NATO and the West European Union, which, as it is envisioned, would allow all members of the European Community to contribute to enhance [our] security.”



". . The 2+4 negotiations were talks in 1990 that allowed for the reunification of Germany, featuring capitalist West Germany and socialist East Germany (the 2) along with the United States, Soviet Union, Britain, and France (the 4).

Chrobog’s comments in the notes, therefore, confirm that the Western powers had promised the USSR in 1990 that they would not expand NATO eastward after German reunification.

Further clarifying this fact, the document adds that there was a “general agreement that membership of NATO and security guarantees [are] unacceptable” for countries east of Germany.. . ."

NATO-expansion-document-promise-UK-US-Germany.png


But seriously, this thread is NOT about the war in Ukraine;

a099gk.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom