Is anyone as sick of this as I am--FBI director Comey breaks FBI-DOJ protocol

Bernie supports all the Democrat positions and endorsed the hack Democrat candidate, how is he not a Democrat?
He's a self-admitted "Democratic Socialist". That's not the party line. He's so far Left he makes the relatively hawkish, One Percenter Hillary look Right.

How Tim Kaine Went From City Council To Vice Presidential Candidate
If we are serious about transforming our country, if we are serious about rebuilding the middle class, if we are serious about reinvigorating our democracy, we need to develop a political movement which, once again, is prepared to take on and defeat a ruling class whose greed is destroying our nation. The billionaire class cannot have it all. Our government belongs to all of us, and not just the one percent.

We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money. We must not accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts, while children in America go hungry and veterans sleep out on the streets.

Today, in America, we are the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, but few Americans know that because so much of the new income and wealth goes to the people on top. In fact, over the last 30 years, there has been a massive transfer of wealth – trillions of wealth – going from the middle class to the top one-tenth of 1 percent – a handful of people who have seen a doubling of the percentage of the wealth they own over that period.

Unbelievably, and grotesquely, the top one-tenth of 1 percent owns nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.

The only difference between Bernie and Hillary is Bernie wants to go faster.

Ask yourself this. Where would Hillary stop?
Hillary is more authoritarian and definitely loves her money. Bernie is more likely to turn the WH into a homeless shelter. Hillary would be wining and dining the Washington elite while they laugh about the "little people".

I'm talking about their political ideology, not their personal styles. Maybe Hillary is asking for less socialism than Bernie now as this step, but where would she stop before she gets to Bernie? Obviously she wouldn't
 
Bernie supports all the Democrat positions and endorsed the hack Democrat candidate, how is he not a Democrat?
He's a self-admitted "Democratic Socialist". That's not the party line. He's so far Left he makes the relatively hawkish, One Percenter Hillary look Right.

How Tim Kaine Went From City Council To Vice Presidential Candidate
If we are serious about transforming our country, if we are serious about rebuilding the middle class, if we are serious about reinvigorating our democracy, we need to develop a political movement which, once again, is prepared to take on and defeat a ruling class whose greed is destroying our nation. The billionaire class cannot have it all. Our government belongs to all of us, and not just the one percent.

We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money. We must not accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts, while children in America go hungry and veterans sleep out on the streets.

Today, in America, we are the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, but few Americans know that because so much of the new income and wealth goes to the people on top. In fact, over the last 30 years, there has been a massive transfer of wealth – trillions of wealth – going from the middle class to the top one-tenth of 1 percent – a handful of people who have seen a doubling of the percentage of the wealth they own over that period.

Unbelievably, and grotesquely, the top one-tenth of 1 percent owns nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.

The only difference between Bernie and Hillary is Bernie wants to go faster.

Ask yourself this. Where would Hillary stop?
Hillary is more authoritarian and definitely loves her money. Bernie is more likely to turn the WH into a homeless shelter. Hillary would be wining and dining the Washington elite while they laugh about the "little people".

I'm talking about their political ideology, not their personal styles. Maybe Hillary is asking for less socialism than Bernie now as this step, but where would she stop before she gets to Bernie? Obviously she wouldn't
Socialism and Capitalism run in degrees, not just "black and white". Bernie is about as far left as you can get. If he had his way, he'd probably nationalize all the industries. Hillary is more capitalism oriented. She's more likely to tax the shit out of those industries to pay for pet social programs, but not nationalize them.
 
The fate of the nation hangs on reckless FBI innuendos.
:boohoo:

It's sad that you have such disdain for fair and honest democracy.
It's even sadder that you will overlook criminal acts out of pure partisanship. That's exactly what you did with Bill Clinton when he perjured himself and faced multiple accusations of sexual harassment and rape, isn't it? Don't you always put politics before truth when there's a Democrat involved?
 
Here 10 days before a National Election we have the FBI director Comey send a letter to 8 Republican house members. He didn't send it to ANY House Democrats. He makes a very loose statement that they are reopening a case that was settled 3 months ago, after a year long investigation, based on emails that didn't come from Hillary Clinton's server. He admits he doesn't know what they contain, he admits they may not even be significant. These emails may be duplicates of what the FBI has already seen, as her aid,
Huma Abedin testified to the FBI that she often forwarded emails to her server to print them out. That may not be considered classified information, and he sent out a letter like this 10 days prior to a National Election--after being advised by his aids not to do this. He offers no explanation of clarity, nothing other than a very loose statement.

Comey breaks DOJ and FBI protocol in doing this, as he did it within 60 days of a National Election.

"Matthew Miller, a former chief spokesman for the Justice Department, was dismayed by the timing of Comey's letter. "Longstanding DOJ and FBI practice is you don't say anything publicly close to an election that can possibly influence that election," Miller said."

Comey, a career federal prosecutor who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, open to criticism from leaders in both parties that he was trying to influence the outcome of the presidential race. In an internal email to FBI employees, Comey wrote: "Of course, we don't ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

"Without knowing how many emails are involved, who wrote them, when they were written or their subject matter, it's impossible to make any informed judgment on this development," said Feinstein, D-Calif.
"The FBI has a history of extreme caution near Election Day so as not to influence the results. Today's break from that tradition is appalling."
The Associated Press acquired the email Friday night.

FBI investigating new emails for classified information - Toshiba

fbi-comey.jpg
Did you expect him to ignore the material? He did his job.
 
The fate of the nation hangs on reckless FBI innuendos.
:boohoo:

It's sad that you have such disdain for fair and honest democracy.
It's even sadder that you will overlook criminal acts out of pure partisanship. That's exactly what you did with Bill Clinton when he perjured himself and faced multiple accusations of sexual harassment and rape, isn't it? Don't you always put politics before truth when there's a Democrat involved?

Credible proof?
 
Here 10 days before a National Election we have the FBI director Comey send a letter to 8 Republican house members. He didn't send it to ANY House Democrats. He makes a very loose statement that they are reopening a case that was settled 3 months ago, after a year long investigation, based on emails that didn't come from Hillary Clinton's server. He admits he doesn't know what they contain, he admits they may not even be significant. These emails may be duplicates of what the FBI has already seen, as her aid,
Huma Abedin testified to the FBI that she often forwarded emails to her server to print them out. That may not be considered classified information, and he sent out a letter like this 10 days prior to a National Election--after being advised by his aids not to do this. He offers no explanation of clarity, nothing other than a very loose statement.

Comey breaks DOJ and FBI protocol in doing this, as he did it within 60 days of a National Election.

"Matthew Miller, a former chief spokesman for the Justice Department, was dismayed by the timing of Comey's letter. "Longstanding DOJ and FBI practice is you don't say anything publicly close to an election that can possibly influence that election," Miller said."

Comey, a career federal prosecutor who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, open to criticism from leaders in both parties that he was trying to influence the outcome of the presidential race. In an internal email to FBI employees, Comey wrote: "Of course, we don't ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

"Without knowing how many emails are involved, who wrote them, when they were written or their subject matter, it's impossible to make any informed judgment on this development," said Feinstein, D-Calif.
"The FBI has a history of extreme caution near Election Day so as not to influence the results. Today's break from that tradition is appalling."
The Associated Press acquired the email Friday night.

FBI investigating new emails for classified information - Toshiba

fbi-comey.jpg
Did you expect him to ignore the material? He did his job.

You mean the "material" he hasn't even seen yet?
 
The fate of the nation hangs on reckless FBI innuendos.
:boohoo:

It's sad that you have such disdain for fair and honest democracy.
It's even sadder that you will overlook criminal acts out of pure partisanship. That's exactly what you did with Bill Clinton when he perjured himself and faced multiple accusations of sexual harassment and rape, isn't it? Don't you always put politics before truth when there's a Democrat involved?

Credible proof?
Yes.
 
Here 10 days before a National Election we have the FBI director Comey send a letter to 8 Republican house members. He didn't send it to ANY House Democrats. He makes a very loose statement that they are reopening a case that was settled 3 months ago, after a year long investigation, based on emails that didn't come from Hillary Clinton's server. He admits he doesn't know what they contain, he admits they may not even be significant. These emails may be duplicates of what the FBI has already seen, as her aid,
Huma Abedin testified to the FBI that she often forwarded emails to her server to print them out. That may not be considered classified information, and he sent out a letter like this 10 days prior to a National Election--after being advised by his aids not to do this. He offers no explanation of clarity, nothing other than a very loose statement.

Comey breaks DOJ and FBI protocol in doing this, as he did it within 60 days of a National Election.

"Matthew Miller, a former chief spokesman for the Justice Department, was dismayed by the timing of Comey's letter. "Longstanding DOJ and FBI practice is you don't say anything publicly close to an election that can possibly influence that election," Miller said."

Comey, a career federal prosecutor who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, open to criticism from leaders in both parties that he was trying to influence the outcome of the presidential race. In an internal email to FBI employees, Comey wrote: "Of course, we don't ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

"Without knowing how many emails are involved, who wrote them, when they were written or their subject matter, it's impossible to make any informed judgment on this development," said Feinstein, D-Calif.
"The FBI has a history of extreme caution near Election Day so as not to influence the results. Today's break from that tradition is appalling."
The Associated Press acquired the email Friday night.

FBI investigating new emails for classified information - Toshiba

fbi-comey.jpg
Did you expect him to ignore the material? He did his job.

You mean the "material" he hasn't even seen yet?
Oh yes, everything has to be by the "book" including announcing the reopening of an investigation he closed prior to receiving this material. He should have received this back in the summer and this may have gone away. Blame Huma, blame Hillary just try not to scapegoat anyone else.:uhoh3::itsok:



:party:
 
Here 10 days before a National Election we have the FBI director Comey send a letter to 8 Republican house members. He didn't send it to ANY House Democrats. He makes a very loose statement that they are reopening a case that was settled 3 months ago, after a year long investigation, based on emails that didn't come from Hillary Clinton's server. He admits he doesn't know what they contain, he admits they may not even be significant. These emails may be duplicates of what the FBI has already seen, as her aid,
Huma Abedin testified to the FBI that she often forwarded emails to her server to print them out. That may not be considered classified information, and he sent out a letter like this 10 days prior to a National Election--after being advised by his aids not to do this. He offers no explanation of clarity, nothing other than a very loose statement.

Comey breaks DOJ and FBI protocol in doing this, as he did it within 60 days of a National Election.

"Matthew Miller, a former chief spokesman for the Justice Department, was dismayed by the timing of Comey's letter. "Longstanding DOJ and FBI practice is you don't say anything publicly close to an election that can possibly influence that election," Miller said."

Comey, a career federal prosecutor who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, open to criticism from leaders in both parties that he was trying to influence the outcome of the presidential race. In an internal email to FBI employees, Comey wrote: "Of course, we don't ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

"Without knowing how many emails are involved, who wrote them, when they were written or their subject matter, it's impossible to make any informed judgment on this development," said Feinstein, D-Calif.
"The FBI has a history of extreme caution near Election Day so as not to influence the results. Today's break from that tradition is appalling."
The Associated Press acquired the email Friday night.

FBI investigating new emails for classified information - Toshiba

fbi-comey.jpg


No....he did not break protocol...he did not inform the public he informed congress...both sides......he did what he is required to do.......
 
Here 10 days before a National Election we have the FBI director Comey send a letter to 8 Republican house members. He didn't send it to ANY House Democrats. He makes a very loose statement that they are reopening a case that was settled 3 months ago, after a year long investigation, based on emails that didn't come from Hillary Clinton's server. He admits he doesn't know what they contain, he admits they may not even be significant. These emails may be duplicates of what the FBI has already seen, as her aid,
Huma Abedin testified to the FBI that she often forwarded emails to her server to print them out. That may not be considered classified information, and he sent out a letter like this 10 days prior to a National Election--after being advised by his aids not to do this. He offers no explanation of clarity, nothing other than a very loose statement.

Comey breaks DOJ and FBI protocol in doing this, as he did it within 60 days of a National Election.

"Matthew Miller, a former chief spokesman for the Justice Department, was dismayed by the timing of Comey's letter. "Longstanding DOJ and FBI practice is you don't say anything publicly close to an election that can possibly influence that election," Miller said."

Comey, a career federal prosecutor who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, open to criticism from leaders in both parties that he was trying to influence the outcome of the presidential race. In an internal email to FBI employees, Comey wrote: "Of course, we don't ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

"Without knowing how many emails are involved, who wrote them, when they were written or their subject matter, it's impossible to make any informed judgment on this development," said Feinstein, D-Calif.
"The FBI has a history of extreme caution near Election Day so as not to influence the results. Today's break from that tradition is appalling."
The Associated Press acquired the email Friday night.

FBI investigating new emails for classified information - Toshiba

fbi-comey.jpg
Nice try. The Beast is going into the election under FBI investigation. If she wins she will still be under investigation which will make for a very bizarre term/


Sadly, it won't.....hilary knows how to wield power...she will fire whoever she has to and use the FBI and IRS as her personal secret police...and the press won't say boo since they want her in office....
 
Bernie supports all the Democrat positions and endorsed the hack Democrat candidate, how is he not a Democrat?
He's a self-admitted "Democratic Socialist". That's not the party line. He's so far Left he makes the relatively hawkish, One Percenter Hillary look Right.

How Tim Kaine Went From City Council To Vice Presidential Candidate
If we are serious about transforming our country, if we are serious about rebuilding the middle class, if we are serious about reinvigorating our democracy, we need to develop a political movement which, once again, is prepared to take on and defeat a ruling class whose greed is destroying our nation. The billionaire class cannot have it all. Our government belongs to all of us, and not just the one percent.

We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money. We must not accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts, while children in America go hungry and veterans sleep out on the streets.

Today, in America, we are the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, but few Americans know that because so much of the new income and wealth goes to the people on top. In fact, over the last 30 years, there has been a massive transfer of wealth – trillions of wealth – going from the middle class to the top one-tenth of 1 percent – a handful of people who have seen a doubling of the percentage of the wealth they own over that period.

Unbelievably, and grotesquely, the top one-tenth of 1 percent owns nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.

The only difference between Bernie and Hillary is Bernie wants to go faster.

Ask yourself this. Where would Hillary stop?
Hillary is more authoritarian and definitely loves her money. Bernie is more likely to turn the WH into a homeless shelter. Hillary would be wining and dining the Washington elite while they laugh about the "little people".

I'm talking about their political ideology, not their personal styles. Maybe Hillary is asking for less socialism than Bernie now as this step, but where would she stop before she gets to Bernie? Obviously she wouldn't
Socialism and Capitalism run in degrees, not just "black and white". Bernie is about as far left as you can get. If he had his way, he'd probably nationalize all the industries. Hillary is more capitalism oriented. She's more likely to tax the shit out of those industries to pay for pet social programs, but not nationalize them.

So you think if she had the opportunity to nationalize them, she'd say no? I don't
 
He's a self-admitted "Democratic Socialist". That's not the party line. He's so far Left he makes the relatively hawkish, One Percenter Hillary look Right.

How Tim Kaine Went From City Council To Vice Presidential Candidate
If we are serious about transforming our country, if we are serious about rebuilding the middle class, if we are serious about reinvigorating our democracy, we need to develop a political movement which, once again, is prepared to take on and defeat a ruling class whose greed is destroying our nation. The billionaire class cannot have it all. Our government belongs to all of us, and not just the one percent.

We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money. We must not accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts, while children in America go hungry and veterans sleep out on the streets.

Today, in America, we are the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, but few Americans know that because so much of the new income and wealth goes to the people on top. In fact, over the last 30 years, there has been a massive transfer of wealth – trillions of wealth – going from the middle class to the top one-tenth of 1 percent – a handful of people who have seen a doubling of the percentage of the wealth they own over that period.

Unbelievably, and grotesquely, the top one-tenth of 1 percent owns nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.

The only difference between Bernie and Hillary is Bernie wants to go faster.

Ask yourself this. Where would Hillary stop?
Hillary is more authoritarian and definitely loves her money. Bernie is more likely to turn the WH into a homeless shelter. Hillary would be wining and dining the Washington elite while they laugh about the "little people".

I'm talking about their political ideology, not their personal styles. Maybe Hillary is asking for less socialism than Bernie now as this step, but where would she stop before she gets to Bernie? Obviously she wouldn't
Socialism and Capitalism run in degrees, not just "black and white". Bernie is about as far left as you can get. If he had his way, he'd probably nationalize all the industries. Hillary is more capitalism oriented. She's more likely to tax the shit out of those industries to pay for pet social programs, but not nationalize them.

So you think if she had the opportunity to nationalize them, she'd say no? I don't


If she could she would assume direct control of the businesses of this country.....
 
He's a self-admitted "Democratic Socialist". That's not the party line. He's so far Left he makes the relatively hawkish, One Percenter Hillary look Right.

How Tim Kaine Went From City Council To Vice Presidential Candidate
If we are serious about transforming our country, if we are serious about rebuilding the middle class, if we are serious about reinvigorating our democracy, we need to develop a political movement which, once again, is prepared to take on and defeat a ruling class whose greed is destroying our nation. The billionaire class cannot have it all. Our government belongs to all of us, and not just the one percent.

We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money. We must not accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts, while children in America go hungry and veterans sleep out on the streets.

Today, in America, we are the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, but few Americans know that because so much of the new income and wealth goes to the people on top. In fact, over the last 30 years, there has been a massive transfer of wealth – trillions of wealth – going from the middle class to the top one-tenth of 1 percent – a handful of people who have seen a doubling of the percentage of the wealth they own over that period.

Unbelievably, and grotesquely, the top one-tenth of 1 percent owns nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.

The only difference between Bernie and Hillary is Bernie wants to go faster.

Ask yourself this. Where would Hillary stop?
Hillary is more authoritarian and definitely loves her money. Bernie is more likely to turn the WH into a homeless shelter. Hillary would be wining and dining the Washington elite while they laugh about the "little people".

I'm talking about their political ideology, not their personal styles. Maybe Hillary is asking for less socialism than Bernie now as this step, but where would she stop before she gets to Bernie? Obviously she wouldn't
Socialism and Capitalism run in degrees, not just "black and white". Bernie is about as far left as you can get. If he had his way, he'd probably nationalize all the industries. Hillary is more capitalism oriented. She's more likely to tax the shit out of those industries to pay for pet social programs, but not nationalize them.

So you think if she had the opportunity to nationalize them, she'd say no? I don't
No. She's too close to Wall Street to do that. Like I said, she's into the money. I wouldn't doubt she has a special drawer in her bedroom filled with cash which she takes out and rolls around in for fun.

tumblr_m2oqja2itc1qcr6iqo1_1280.jpg
 
The only difference between Bernie and Hillary is Bernie wants to go faster.

Ask yourself this. Where would Hillary stop?
Hillary is more authoritarian and definitely loves her money. Bernie is more likely to turn the WH into a homeless shelter. Hillary would be wining and dining the Washington elite while they laugh about the "little people".

I'm talking about their political ideology, not their personal styles. Maybe Hillary is asking for less socialism than Bernie now as this step, but where would she stop before she gets to Bernie? Obviously she wouldn't
Socialism and Capitalism run in degrees, not just "black and white". Bernie is about as far left as you can get. If he had his way, he'd probably nationalize all the industries. Hillary is more capitalism oriented. She's more likely to tax the shit out of those industries to pay for pet social programs, but not nationalize them.

So you think if she had the opportunity to nationalize them, she'd say no? I don't
No. She's too close to Wall Street to do that. Like I said, she's into the money. I wouldn't doubt she has a special drawer in her bedroom filled with cash which she takes out and rolls around in for fun.

tumblr_m2oqja2itc1qcr6iqo1_1280.jpg

You can believe that, but I believe she would never stop
 
--LOL

bunch a butthurts goin on

--LOL


Did you know the House Democrats have called an FBI investigation into Trumps ties with Russia. Did you know that the New York State Attorney Generals' office is opening up an investigation into the Trump Foundation, and recently ordered a cease and desist order on that foundation? I think you'll be laughing out your ass when this breaks.
Democrats ask the FBI to investigate Trump advisers’ Russia ties
'I've never encountered anything so brazen': Report details shocking new revelations about Trump Foundation

It's basically a case of stop the election, get rid of Trump and Hillary and start again and do it properly.
This I can agree with.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom