Is Anthropogenic (Human-Caused) Global Warming/AGW Falsifiable?

[mamooth]

I'm walking you through it. Can you identify the surface elevation in the graph on the right?

I don't play questions games. You do, so you can evade answering a very simple question.

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

Libertarians are 180 degrees from fascist, including Zionist Fascist

Einstein Letter Warning Of Zionist Facism In Israel

Libertarians are worse frauds than republicans.

 

[EMH]

Libertarians are worse frauds than republicans.

Libertarians support the two things you as a Zionist Fascist hate the most - truth and freedom

 

[ding]

I don't play questions games. You do, so you can evade answering a very simple question.

I can't explain it to you unless you are able to read this graph. Do you see where to read the surface elevation on the graph on the right? Yes or no?

 

[mamooth]

I can't explain it to you

It looks like you can't explain it to anyone, becuase you keep refusing to do so.

Again, stop with the cowardly question games. I'm not your dancing monkey, little control freak. Find your gonads, act like a liberal, and just clearly and directly explain your point.

 

[BackAgain]

Just to answer the silly OP thread headline:

No.

It certainly isn’t falsifiable.

 

[ding]

It looks like you can't explain it to anyone, becuase you keep refusing to do so.

Again, stop with the cowardly question games. I'm not your dancing monkey, little control freak. Find your gonads, act like a liberal, and just clearly and directly explain your point.

Do you see where to read the surface elevation on the graph on the right?

 

[ding]

Just to answer the silly OP thread headline:

No.

It certainly isn’t falsifiable.

It is falsifiable though because their PROJECTIONS are falsifiable. They are adding feedbacks equal to 3.5 times the GHG effect of CO2 in their projections. That's falsifiable. If that were correct the planet wouldn't have cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 1.5 times greater than today. The supposed feedbacks would have been to strong.

 

[mamooth]

Do you see where to read the surface elevation on the graph on the right?

At this point, rather then repeat what you've run from before, I'll just give you a well-deserved "**** off, troll."

 

[ding]

At this point, rather then repeat what you've run from before, I'll just give you a well-deserved "**** off, troll."

I'm trying to explain it to you. Do you see where to read the surface elevation on the graph on the right? Do you see the word "altitude?" Do you realize the altitude of the surface would be 0 on that curve? Do you understand these things? Do you realize the atmosphere has a temperature profile based upon altitude?

 

[Dagosa]

Libertarians support the two things you as a Zionist Fascist hate the most - truth and freedom

Fraud….you lie all the time and are totally ignorant of science. You spew anti semitic hate.

 

[EMH]

Fraud….you lie all the time and are totally ignorant of science. You spew anti semitic hate.

CLIMATE TRUTH = anti semitic hate
911 TRUTH = anti semitic hate
Covid TRUTH = anti semitic hate
Murderous FRAUD VAX TRUTH = anti semitic hate
10.7 TRUTH = anti semitic hate


anti semitic hate = telling the TRUTH about Zionist Fascism

Einstein Letter Warning Of Zionist Facism In Israel

 

[Crick]

Just to answer the silly OP thread headline:

No.

It certainly isn’t falsifiable.

Really? What if someone showed that the CO2 in the atmosphere above the pre-industrial 280 ppm wasn't of human origin? What if someone showed that CO2 didn't absorb infrared and therefore wasn't a greenhouse gas? What if someone showed that the world has not warmed? What if someone showed that the warming we've experienced was entirely due to something other than greenhouse warming?

What made you think it wasn't falsifiable? What do you think AGW theory actually says?

 

[ding]

Oceans and atmosphere warming when the northern hemisphere deglaciates falsifies AGW.

 

[BackAgain]

Really? What if someone showed that the CO2 in the atmosphere above the pre-industrial 280 ppm wasn't of human origin? What if someone showed that CO2 didn't absorb infrared and therefore wasn't a greenhouse gas? What if someone showed that the world has not warmed? What if someone showed that the warming we've experienced was entirely due to something other than greenhouse warming?

What made you think it wasn't falsifiable? What do you think AGW theory actually says?

Lots of what ifs.

Let’s just say that much of the atmospheric co2 today did come from human industrial activities since maybe 1850 or so. Ok.

And?

 

[Crick]

Lots of what ifs.

You're dodging. Every single thing I noted would falsify AGW if found to be the case.

Let’s just say that much of the atmospheric co2 today did come from human industrial activities since maybe 1850 or so. Ok.

And?

Do you accept the greenhouse effect?

Do you accept that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, ie, that it absorbs infrared?

 

[BackAgain]

You're dodging. Every single thing I noted would falsify AGW if found to be the case.

Nonsense.

Do you accept the greenhouse effect?

For an entire planet? No. I assume you do for an entire planet.

Do you accept that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, ie, that it absorbs infrared?

Yep. But it is minor trace gas measure in only a few hundred parts per million and water vapor is actually far more significant. Do you deny that?

 

[Robert W]

Nonsense.

For an entire planet? No. I assume you do for an entire planet.

Yep. But it is minor trace gas measure in only a few hundred parts per million and water vapor is actually far more significant. Do you deny that?

Crick is a loyal Democrat. You will find that cult is behind the claim man is to blame for climate. They have not yet proven this by test cases of man being in charge of climate.

 

[Robert W]

Do you accept the greenhouse effect?

Do you accept that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, ie, that it absorbs infrared?

Will you explain why then at Death Valley, CA, the record temperatures at that location still were set in 1913? And explain assuming CO2 is a constant or increasing force, that temperatures range from very hot and days later become a lot colder?
The CO2 theory should give us constant records and not have those followed days later by colder temperatures!!!
It is 60 degrees F here where I live yet days ago it was over 90 degrees. What happened to the Carbon Dioxide you fret over?

Past Weather in Boise, Idaho, USA — Yesterday or Further Back

Weather reports from the last weeks in Boise with highs and lows

www.timeanddate.com

 

[Crick]

Nonsense.

Why do you think it is nonsense to claim that AGW could be falsified?

For an entire planet? No. I assume you do for an entire planet.

So, you believe the greenhouse effect is regional? Could you explain how that would work?

Yep. But it is minor trace gas measure in only a few hundred parts per million and water vapor is actually far more significant. Do you deny that?

Water vapor is responsible for half the Earth's greenhouse warming. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, CO2 was responsible for one-third of Earth's greenhouse warming. Today, at a 50% higher atmospheric level, it is responsible for one half of our current warming.