TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
This was inspired by this post:
If you don't like reading long posts please skip ahead to the black, bold part of this.
The official diagnosis of Autism in a simple to understand format: a deficit in the ability to decipher the varied exchanges of human communication and interaction, as well as a deficit in learning efficient means of exacting influence on your environment (among other things but I'm trying to make it super simple here).
Now that's an extremely loose definition but my goal is to explain how autism can be "cured" as is posited by the post that I quoted.
Autism is nothing more than a diagnosis. The goal of every person that works with an individual with autism is for that diagnosis to go away. Doctors diagnose patients all the time. If you have the flu, you get antibiotics. But if a person has autism then what is the medicine?
There is a science to helping individuals with autism learn the necessary skills to afford as normal a life as possible. Success varies but there are infinite methods to improve the life of a person with that diagnosis. So because they're lives are improved does that make them cured?
I would not consider those people as "cured" because there was no disease, just a deficit or lack of sufficient skills. The environment they were in was unable to adapt them to everyday life just as it pretty automatically did with all of us. So suppose someone changed that environment (through the child's school, their therapist, their doctor, etc.) and that child was able to learn the necessary skills to interact with the world however they wanted. I would see them as an individual who no longer meets the criteria for having "autism" rather than "cured."
I'll try to relate this to you all in an example:
My colleague once worked with a 6 year old who had never spoken a single word, ate only junk food and chicken nuggets (food tolerance - a difficult to treat trend amongst people with disabilities), and resorted to tantrums when they wanted something. The child was diagnosed with Pervasive Developmental Disorder and then Autism. After years of therapy at age 15 they were on their way home with their mother and asked her "Mom, what is autism?" The mom panicked a bit about the answer until the son said, "I think my friend might have it." That's because the child had been taught methods of dealing with their previous deficiencies. Just as all of us have found ways of dealing with our own deficiencies.
That's what I consider "cured." Autism is not a disease it is a label. It just means that these kids require some extra attention and a little bit more patience. Many of us know someone affected by autism. Please be patient and understanding with them.
Is a label of autism lifelong?...
Children 'may grow out of autism'
16 January 2013 - Some young children accurately diagnosed as autistic lose their symptoms and their diagnosis as they get older, say US researchers.
Quote:
The findings of the National Institutes of Health study of 112 children appears to challenge the widely held belief that autism is a lifelong condition. While not conclusive, the study, in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, suggests some children might possibly outgrow autism. But experts urge caution. Much more work is needed to find out what might explain the findings.
Dr Deborah Fein and her team at the University of Connecticut studied 34 children who had been diagnosed with autism in early childhood but went on to function as well as 34 other children in their classes at school. On tests - cognitive and observational, as well as reports from the children's parents and school - they were indistinguishable from their classroom peers. They now showed no sign of problems with language, face recognition, communication or social interaction. For comparison, the researchers also studied another 44 children of the same age, sex and non-verbal IQ level who had had a diagnosis of "high-functioning" autism - meaning they were deemed to be less severely affected by their condition.
It became clear that the children in the optimal outcome group - the ones who no longer had recognisable signs of autism - had had milder social deficits than the high-functioning autism group in early childhood, although they did have other autism symptoms, like repetitive behaviours and communication problems, that were as severe. The researchers went back and checked the accuracy of the children's original diagnosis, but found no reason to suspect that they had been inaccurate.
Label for life?
If you don't like reading long posts please skip ahead to the black, bold part of this.
The official diagnosis of Autism in a simple to understand format: a deficit in the ability to decipher the varied exchanges of human communication and interaction, as well as a deficit in learning efficient means of exacting influence on your environment (among other things but I'm trying to make it super simple here).
Now that's an extremely loose definition but my goal is to explain how autism can be "cured" as is posited by the post that I quoted.
Autism is nothing more than a diagnosis. The goal of every person that works with an individual with autism is for that diagnosis to go away. Doctors diagnose patients all the time. If you have the flu, you get antibiotics. But if a person has autism then what is the medicine?
There is a science to helping individuals with autism learn the necessary skills to afford as normal a life as possible. Success varies but there are infinite methods to improve the life of a person with that diagnosis. So because they're lives are improved does that make them cured?
I would not consider those people as "cured" because there was no disease, just a deficit or lack of sufficient skills. The environment they were in was unable to adapt them to everyday life just as it pretty automatically did with all of us. So suppose someone changed that environment (through the child's school, their therapist, their doctor, etc.) and that child was able to learn the necessary skills to interact with the world however they wanted. I would see them as an individual who no longer meets the criteria for having "autism" rather than "cured."
I'll try to relate this to you all in an example:
My colleague once worked with a 6 year old who had never spoken a single word, ate only junk food and chicken nuggets (food tolerance - a difficult to treat trend amongst people with disabilities), and resorted to tantrums when they wanted something. The child was diagnosed with Pervasive Developmental Disorder and then Autism. After years of therapy at age 15 they were on their way home with their mother and asked her "Mom, what is autism?" The mom panicked a bit about the answer until the son said, "I think my friend might have it." That's because the child had been taught methods of dealing with their previous deficiencies. Just as all of us have found ways of dealing with our own deficiencies.
That's what I consider "cured." Autism is not a disease it is a label. It just means that these kids require some extra attention and a little bit more patience. Many of us know someone affected by autism. Please be patient and understanding with them.