Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 90,229
- 68,075
- 3,565
They are partners in the Axis of EvilCan Russia defeat Iran? Hell no.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are partners in the Axis of EvilCan Russia defeat Iran? Hell no.
We are doing de-nazification. It means, nazies should be killed.You Russians have a ton of your own problems. Trying to whip Ukraine and not able to finish them off.
No. They hated our guts before we invaded them, and it is exactly why we invaded them. And, of course, after we kill everyone who hate us, all survivors will love us.They hate your guts after you invaded them.
It could be a lesser evil.Even Russians aren't that stupid.
We (both Russians and Iranians) are not evil. We are good guys. You are evil.They are partners in the Axis of Evil
You are delusionalWe (both Russians and Iranians) are not evil. We are good guys. You are evil.
It's basic axiom of the detterence game. It suppose that all players are rational thinking, can calculate consequences of their actions and don't want to commit suicide, while are ready to absorb certain damage.Do we have your guarantee for that?
Minor nuclear powers can't make Armageddon. And no, if your "libs" were that spineless, Russia, with much more significant nuclear forces, would demand Alaska back decades ago, China would demand Taiwan and DPRK would demand Southern Korea.But I suspect they will not have to
If the islamic dictatorship has nukes, along with slightly improved ICBMs than they have today, jihadi’s only have to threaten spineless libs with Armageddon and you people will promptly fold and agree to whatever Iran demands
We are talking about stupidity, not evil. They are not one and the same.It could be a lesser evil.
Ok. Giving nukes to Iran could be smarter move, than giving Iran to the USA.We are talking about stupidity, not evil. They are not one and the same.
SureIt's basic axiom of the detterence game. It suppose that all players are rational thinking, can calculate consequences of their actions and don't want to commit suicide, while are ready to absorb certain damage.
Minor nuclear powers can't make Armageddon. And no, if your "libs" were that spineless, Russia, with much more significant nuclear forces, would demand Alaska back decades ago, China would demand Taiwan and DPRK would demand Southern Korea.
Attention Democrats. This Russian is interfering with our elections. Why are you not batting his posts to death?It's basic axiom of the detterence game. It suppose that all players are rational thinking, can calculate consequences of their actions and don't want to commit suicide, while are ready to absorb certain damage.
Minor nuclear powers can't make Armageddon. And no, if your "libs" were that spineless, Russia, with much more significant nuclear forces, would demand Alaska back decades ago, China would demand Taiwan and DPRK would demand Southern Korea.
The theocracy in iran is anything but rationalIt's basic axiom of the detterence game. It suppose that all players are rational thinking, can calculate consequences of their actions and don't want to commit suicide, while are ready to absorb certain damage.
Minor nuclear powers can't make Armageddon. And no, if your "libs" were that spineless, Russia, with much more significant nuclear forces, would demand Alaska back decades ago, China would demand Taiwan and DPRK would demand Southern Korea.
You see, The Great War started because both sides though they were ready for it, and both sides decided to escalate. This assasination was just a pretext.Sure
And assissanation or a two-bit arch duke in Serbia could not lead to what we now call The Great War
But it did
Iranians kill Iranians. Just nothing of your business.
You're nuts. Nobody wants Iran except perhaps Putin.Ok. Giving nukes to Iran could be smarter move, than giving Iran to the USA.
Who says that Iran will not bomb the US too?You see, The Great War started because both sides though they were ready for it, and both sides decided to escalate. This assasination was just a pretext.
Can nuclear exchange, say, between Iran and Israel, escalate to the war between Russia and America and then - to the war NATO+ vs Shanghai Block+? Yes it can, but only if both Moscow and Washington are ready for it.
Now htf is Iran going to bomb the US? And no, even with nukes, only a small % of Iranians would be killed.Who says that Iran will not bomb the US too?
Almost everyone in Iran will die anyway
They are not suicidal. They do what is necessary to do to protect their country and their people.The theocracy in iran is anything but rational
They are clever, even remarkable in some ways, but suicidal
First of all, it's a great opportunity to kill some Americans and their allies. You supply our enemies, we supply your enemies.Then why is it your business to resupply them?
They will. But only if Russia and China allow them.Who says that Iran will not bomb the US too?
Of course, not. Nuclear exchange by itself will hardly kill 30% of them.Almost everyone in Iran will die anyway
Yet they are doing an excellent job destroying themselves.They are not suicidal.
Reported to the FBI.First of all, it's a great opportunity to kill some Americans and their allies.
Really sucks then that we are not going nowhere.Second, we have business interest there, and American occupation of Iran might spoil them.
Of course we all want Iran. There are a lot of oil, it is strategically important as a part of Russian North-South corridor, and China's "One way" initiative.You're nuts. Nobody wants Iran except perhaps Putin.