IQ Test: take it

[iamwhatiseem]

You got a 154?...that means one question I am answering is wrong...what the?

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Obviously this is not realistic. It is like all "internet IQ test" - for fun.

 

[RKMBrown]

145... I call BS my IQ is much higher than that.

 

[Asclepias]

145... I call BS my IQ is much higher than that.

its actually 15 points lower according to welfarequeen. I always knew I was smarter than you. Now we have proof.

 

[Asclepias]

You got a 154?...that means one question I am answering is wrong...what the?

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Obviously this is not realistic. It is like all "internet IQ test" - for fun.

I got a 156.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Affirmative action - go ahead and retake test 2-3 times...now that is funny

 

[WelfareQueen]

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Makes some sense. the other 'actual' IQ tests Ive taken left me right around 135.

Yeah....it's 10-15 points high. I would assume most folks at USMB are 117 I.Q. or above. 117 is the mean I.Q. of a 4 year college graduate. 144 I.Q. is the mean for someone with a post graduate degree.

Btw....the number one predictive variable for educational attainment and income is I.Q. In other words....if you are smart you are better educated and make more money. Kind of obvious I guess.

Conversely, low I.Q. is the number one predictive variable for those that are incarcerated....children born out of wedlock....low income....and lack of educational attainment. Race is not the variable....it is purely low I.Q.

In other words....in America if you are a black man with a 117 I.Q. you are equally as likely to get a 4 year college degree as a white person. You are equally likely to make more money. You are much less likely to be incarcerated, have illegitimate children, etc.

People who dismiss I.Q. testing do not know how powerful and predictive it is. CEO's....Corporate Leaders....U.S. Presidents do not have 85 I.Q.'s. Nothing measures life trajectory better. Nothing.

Thats a load of bull. If I come from a different culture I could easily bomb that test.

Utter bullshit. There are many I.Q. tests that are culturally neutral....including the test you just took. Math is not culture specific. Shapes are not culture specific.

And btw....blacks performance worse on culturally neutral tests than so called biased tested.

Your point = fail.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

You got a 154?...that means one question I am answering is wrong...what the?

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Obviously this is not realistic. It is like all "internet IQ test" - for fun.

I got a 156.

How can there be a two point difference? There is not enough questions for that small of a difference.

 

[Asclepias]

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Makes some sense. the other 'actual' IQ tests Ive taken left me right around 135.

Yeah....it's 10-15 points high. I would assume most folks at USMB are 117 I.Q. or above. 117 is the mean I.Q. of a 4 year college graduate. 144 I.Q. is the mean for someone with a post graduate degree.

Btw....the number one predictive variable for educational attainment and income is I.Q. In other words....if you are smart you are better educated and make more money. Kind of obvious I guess.

Conversely, low I.Q. is the number one predictive variable for those that are incarcerated....children born out of wedlock....low income....and lack of educational attainment. Race is not the variable....it is purely low I.Q.

In other words....in America if you are a black man with a 117 I.Q. you are equally as likely to get a 4 year college degree as a white person. You are equally likely to make more money. You are much less likely to be incarcerated, have illegitimate children, etc.

People who dismiss I.Q. testing do not know how powerful and predictive it is. CEO's....Corporate Leaders....U.S. Presidents do not have 85 I.Q.'s. Nothing measures life trajectory better. Nothing.

Thats a load of bull. If I come from a different culture I could easily bomb that test.

Utter bullshit. There are many I.Q. tests that are culturally neutral....including the test you just took. Math is not culture specific. Shapes are not culture specific.

And btw....blacks performance worse on culturally neutral tests than so called biased tested.

Your point = fail.

BS. Shapes are definitely culture specific. Everything is based on a mindset of how things are supposed to be. For instance would I be wrong in saying the US is in the northern hemisphere? The answer is no. The reason is because Europeans made up the fallacy that what we call the northern hemisphere is above the southern hemisphere.

 

[WelfareQueen]

You got a 154?...that means one question I am answering is wrong...what the?

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Obviously this is not realistic. It is like all "internet IQ test" - for fun.

I got a 156.

How can there be a two point difference? There is not enough questions for that small of a difference.

It may be timed. That would be my guess.

 

[RKMBrown]

145... I call BS my IQ is much higher than that.

its actually 15 points lower according to welfarequeen. I always knew I was smarter than you. Now we have proof.

The lowest I've scored on a "real" IQ test is 153. So the queen might be wrong, just sayin. But she is right in so far as the number of questions was too small. I doubt I got any of them wrong but I might have been dinged for watching fox while taking it.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Makes some sense. the other 'actual' IQ tests Ive taken left me right around 135.

Yeah....it's 10-15 points high. I would assume most folks at USMB are 117 I.Q. or above. 117 is the mean I.Q. of a 4 year college graduate. 144 I.Q. is the mean for someone with a post graduate degree.

Btw....the number one predictive variable for educational attainment and income is I.Q. In other words....if you are smart you are better educated and make more money. Kind of obvious I guess.

Conversely, low I.Q. is the number one predictive variable for those that are incarcerated....children born out of wedlock....low income....and lack of educational attainment. Race is not the variable....it is purely low I.Q.

In other words....in America if you are a black man with a 117 I.Q. you are equally as likely to get a 4 year college degree as a white person. You are equally likely to make more money. You are much less likely to be incarcerated, have illegitimate children, etc.

People who dismiss I.Q. testing do not know how powerful and predictive it is. CEO's....Corporate Leaders....U.S. Presidents do not have 85 I.Q.'s. Nothing measures life trajectory better. Nothing.

Thats a load of bull. If I come from a different culture I could easily bomb that test.

Utter bullshit. There are many I.Q. tests that are culturally neutral....including the test you just took. Math is not culture specific. Shapes are not culture specific.

And btw....blacks performance worse on culturally neutral tests than so called biased tested.

Your point = fail.

BS. Shapes are definitely culture specific. Everything is based on a mindset of how things are supposed to be. For instance would I be wrong in saying the US is in the northern hemisphere? The answer is no. The reason is because Europeans made up the fallacy that what we call the northern hemisphere is above the southern hemisphere.

You are truly an idiot. Do some research on the topic and stop talking out of your ass.

 

[Asclepias]

You got a 154?...that means one question I am answering is wrong...what the?

Sorry folks...this is my field. The test skews high by 10-15 points. I got 156. I am not 156! The minimum valid inventories would be a Wonderlic which is 40 items timed to be completed in 12 minutes.

The best tests have a minimum 100 items and are timed. In graduate school we all had to take multiple I.Q. and other psychometric tests. My scores averaged 144 (about the average for anyone with a post-graduate degree).

There are plenty of valid I.Q. tests you can buy cheaply or take on line. This is not valid. If you choose to consider it at all.....minus -10-15 points.

Obviously this is not realistic. It is like all "internet IQ test" - for fun.

I got a 156.

How can there be a two point difference? There is not enough questions for that small of a difference.

I posted my results in a screen shot. Youd have to ask whoever claimed they got a 154.

 

[Asclepias]

Makes some sense. the other 'actual' IQ tests Ive taken left me right around 135.

Yeah....it's 10-15 points high. I would assume most folks at USMB are 117 I.Q. or above. 117 is the mean I.Q. of a 4 year college graduate. 144 I.Q. is the mean for someone with a post graduate degree.

Btw....the number one predictive variable for educational attainment and income is I.Q. In other words....if you are smart you are better educated and make more money. Kind of obvious I guess.

Conversely, low I.Q. is the number one predictive variable for those that are incarcerated....children born out of wedlock....low income....and lack of educational attainment. Race is not the variable....it is purely low I.Q.

In other words....in America if you are a black man with a 117 I.Q. you are equally as likely to get a 4 year college degree as a white person. You are equally likely to make more money. You are much less likely to be incarcerated, have illegitimate children, etc.

People who dismiss I.Q. testing do not know how powerful and predictive it is. CEO's....Corporate Leaders....U.S. Presidents do not have 85 I.Q.'s. Nothing measures life trajectory better. Nothing.

Thats a load of bull. If I come from a different culture I could easily bomb that test.

Utter bullshit. There are many I.Q. tests that are culturally neutral....including the test you just took. Math is not culture specific. Shapes are not culture specific.

And btw....blacks performance worse on culturally neutral tests than so called biased tested.

Your point = fail.

BS. Shapes are definitely culture specific. Everything is based on a mindset of how things are supposed to be. For instance would I be wrong in saying the US is in the northern hemisphere? The answer is no. The reason is because Europeans made up the fallacy that what we call the northern hemisphere is above the southern hemisphere.

You are truly an idiot. Do some research on the topic and stop talking out of your ass.

I have done research. Youre full of bull shit.

 

[WelfareQueen]

145... I call BS my IQ is much higher than that.

its actually 15 points lower according to welfarequeen. I always knew I was smarter than you. Now we have proof.

The lowest I've scored on a "real" IQ test is 153. So the queen might be wrong, just sayin. But she is right in so far as the number of questions was too small. I doubt I got any of them wrong but I might have been dinged for watching fox while taking it.

Sample size is important. 5-10 items does not make a legitimate test. Psychometrics needs to hit math, verbal, and reasoning skills. Too few items in this test to accurately measure those indices.

 

[ChrisL]

Someone should post a real accurate IQ test.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Yeah....it's 10-15 points high. I would assume most folks at USMB are 117 I.Q. or above. 117 is the mean I.Q. of a 4 year college graduate. 144 I.Q. is the mean for someone with a post graduate degree.

Btw....the number one predictive variable for educational attainment and income is I.Q. In other words....if you are smart you are better educated and make more money. Kind of obvious I guess.

Conversely, low I.Q. is the number one predictive variable for those that are incarcerated....children born out of wedlock....low income....and lack of educational attainment. Race is not the variable....it is purely low I.Q.

In other words....in America if you are a black man with a 117 I.Q. you are equally as likely to get a 4 year college degree as a white person. You are equally likely to make more money. You are much less likely to be incarcerated, have illegitimate children, etc.

People who dismiss I.Q. testing do not know how powerful and predictive it is. CEO's....Corporate Leaders....U.S. Presidents do not have 85 I.Q.'s. Nothing measures life trajectory better. Nothing.

Thats a load of bull. If I come from a different culture I could easily bomb that test.

Utter bullshit. There are many I.Q. tests that are culturally neutral....including the test you just took. Math is not culture specific. Shapes are not culture specific.

And btw....blacks performance worse on culturally neutral tests than so called biased tested.

Your point = fail.

BS. Shapes are definitely culture specific. Everything is based on a mindset of how things are supposed to be. For instance would I be wrong in saying the US is in the northern hemisphere? The answer is no. The reason is because Europeans made up the fallacy that what we call the northern hemisphere is above the southern hemisphere.

You are truly an idiot. Do some research on the topic and stop talking out of your ass.

I have done research. Youre full of bull shit.

I think you meant you're....and yes you are talking out of your ass. You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

 

[Asclepias]

145... I call BS my IQ is much higher than that.

its actually 15 points lower according to welfarequeen. I always knew I was smarter than you. Now we have proof.

The lowest I've scored on a "real" IQ test is 153. So the queen might be wrong, just sayin. But she is right in so far as the number of questions was too small. I doubt I got any of them wrong but I might have been dinged for watching fox while taking it.

Well you had to get at least one wrong. I scored a 156. I dont know if there is a higher score. I keep taking it and cant get higher than 156.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Someone should post a real accurate IQ test.

Most all of them are copywritten. You maybe can find a legit one on the internet but I doubt it.

Barnes & Noble used to sell a $4 dollar version you can take at home. It is legit....as long as you time yourself and don't cheat.

 

[Asclepias]

Thats a load of bull. If I come from a different culture I could easily bomb that test.

Utter bullshit. There are many I.Q. tests that are culturally neutral....including the test you just took. Math is not culture specific. Shapes are not culture specific.

And btw....blacks performance worse on culturally neutral tests than so called biased tested.

Your point = fail.

BS. Shapes are definitely culture specific. Everything is based on a mindset of how things are supposed to be. For instance would I be wrong in saying the US is in the northern hemisphere? The answer is no. The reason is because Europeans made up the fallacy that what we call the northern hemisphere is above the southern hemisphere.

You are truly an idiot. Do some research on the topic and stop talking out of your ass.

I have done research. Youre full of bull shit.

I think you meant you're....and yes you are talking out of your ass. You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

No I meant youre. This isnt a punctuation test. I have plenty of clues. For example lets see if you can get this right

Which word does not fit

painting, poem, flower, song.

 

[Ravi]

I corrected my response and scored 156.

And it went wicked fast the second time. I believe 156 must be the highest score possible.