Iowa poll: Voters Reject Biden Vaccine Mandate, Support Governors Stepping up to Block It, Biden Overall Approval is at 31%

Irrrelevant. If it were unconstitutional, the SC would have said so.
It's the only thing relevant. It's called the Tenth Amendment. Powers not listed in the Constitution are hereby delegated to the states. Surely, you know the Tenth Amendment. And as far as the SCOTUS goes, no they wouldn't have said so because there's been no precedent for this. We are about to find out shortly, however.

IMO, this is situation tailor-made for the General Welfare clause.
You have no idea what the General Welfare clause means. You just regurgitate it because it's easy just to say "Oh, it's in the interest of the 'general welfare,' " but in reality you have no idea what that even entails.
 
f652e0ee657f12ae249681a12343883501693d90b150a323b42532fa8f450035.jpg
 
Because democrats only know how to win elections with no idea on how to govern.

Not that they even care.

I'm sure the media will churn out enough propaganda come election time to win another for the DNC.

And your an expert on how to govern.
You couldn't manage a decent bowel motion.
 
It's the only thing relevant. It's called the Tenth Amendment. Powers not listed in the Constitution are hereby delegated to the states. Surely, you know the Tenth Amendment. And as far as the SCOTUS goes, no they wouldn't have said so because there's been no precedent for this. We are about to find out shortly, however.


You have no idea what the General Welfare clause means. You just regurgitate it because it's easy just to say "Oh, it's in the interest of the 'general welfare,' " but in reality you have no idea what that even entails.
Speaking of the Constitution, you live in only one of two counties in the entire country where allegedly "disinformed" speech about Covid is on the brink of being criminalized because "public health crisis."

Democrats REALLY don't like it when their narratives are challenged, so add what the Clark County Dems are about to do to the list of actions destined for the highest court.

Step 1:

 
Speaking of the Constitution, you live in only one of two counties in the entire country where allegedly "disinformed" speech about Covid is on the brink of being criminalized because "public health crisis."

No it’s not
 
Irrrelevant. If it were unconstitutional, the SC would have said so. IMO, this is situation tailor-made for the General Welfare clause.
Has the mandate made it to SCOTUS? Don’t think so….But they probably would uphold it.
 
It's the only thing relevant. It's called the Tenth Amendment. Powers not listed in the Constitution are hereby delegated to the states. Surely, you know the Tenth Amendment. And as far as the SCOTUS goes, no they wouldn't have said so because there's been no precedent for this. We are about to find out shortly, however.


You have no idea what the General Welfare clause means. You just regurgitate it because it's easy just to say "Oh, it's in the interest of the 'general welfare,' " but in reality you have no idea what that even entails.

Exactly. The general welfare Clause is not a stand-alone clause. Its scope expressly applies to the federal government's enumerated powers, there is simply nothing in the Constitution that supports exceeding that scope.
 

Forum List

Back
Top