OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,600
- 2,220
The point, and Yovanovich replied to it this way, was that hearing the President say such nasty negative things about a witness testifying against him, would be intimidating to FUTURE WITNESSES, not her. He'd already shit all over her in public. What else could he say.For just a second let's assume Schiff is correct (I know....I know......what are the odds).........if what Trump tweeted could be construed as witness intimidation there would be no way to intimidate the witness with the tweet unless Schifferbrains read part of it during her testimony. Otherwise, she would have no clue what Trump tweeted until she was done being a "witness".
So, wouldn't that make Schifferbrains the one who intimidated the witness?
I agree Schiff should have played this differently, perhaps ignored it until his wrap up arguments and left her out of it. Because anyone who hasn't been living in a cave for the past three years knows EXACTLY what they'll have coming to them if they criticize the President. It's not like this was some kind of startling behavior on Trump's part. The "intimidating" has been done for three years.
But it did get her a lot of nice compliments from all present, as they tried to pedal backward from Trump as fast as they could.