International Red Cross report deems detainee treatment "Inhuman"

Oct 18, 2008
470
41
16
Bowling Green Ohio
who was that that told me before that the red cross didnt see anything wrong with detainee treatment at gitmo or anyplace else,well this says otherwise!

Report Calls CIA Detainee Treatment 'Inhuman'

By Joby Warrick and Julie Tate
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, April 7, 2009; A06

Medical officers who oversaw interrogations of terrorism suspects in CIA secret prisons committed gross violations of medical ethics and in some cases essentially participated in torture, the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded in a confidential report that labeled the CIA program "inhuman."

Health personnel offered supervision and even assistance as suspected al-Qaeda operatives were beaten, deprived of food, exposed to temperature extremes and subjected to waterboarding, the relief agency said in the 2007 report, a copy of which was posted on a magazine Web site yesterday. The report quoted one medical official as telling a detainee: "I look after your body only because we need you for information."

New details about alleged CIA interrogation practices were contained in the 43-page volume written by ICRC officials who were given unprecedented access to the CIA's "high-value detainees" in late 2006. While excerpts of the report were leaked previously, the entire document was made public for the first time by author Mark Danner, a journalism professor, on the Web site of the New York Review of Books.

The confidential report sheds additional light on the CIA's handling of the detainees, who were held in secret overseas prisons for up to four years and subjected to what the agency describes as "enhanced interrogation techniques." In addition to widely reported methods such as waterboarding, the report alleges that several of the detainees were forced to stand for days in painful positions with their arms shackled overhead. One prisoner reported being shackled in this manner for "two to three months, seven days of prolonged stress standing followed by two days of being able to sit or lie down."

In addition to the coercive methods -- which the ICRC said "amounted to torture" and a violation of U.S. and international treaty obligations -- the report said detainees were routinely threatened with further violence against themselves and their families. Nine of the 14 prisoners said they were threatened with "electric shocks, infection with HIV, sodomy of the detainee and . . . being brought close to death," it said.

The ICRC report was based on accounts made separately to agency investigators by individual detainees, all of whom had been kept in isolation before the interviews, the document states. CIA officials have confirmed that three of the prisoners were subjected to waterboarding, which simulates drowning.

An ICRC spokesman confirmed the authenticity of the document and said the organization "deplores that what was to be a confidential report has been made public."

The CIA declined yesterday to comment on the report, citing the Red Cross's own policy of maintaining the confidentiality of its reports. But spokesman Mark Mansfield noted that the agency had long since ended the controversial interrogation program.

"Director [Leon] Panetta has taken decisive steps to ensure that the CIA abides by the president's executive orders. That means CIA will not use interrogation techniques outside the Army Field Manual," he said. He noted that Panetta also has stated repeatedly that "no one who took actions based on legal guidance from the Department of Justice at the time should be investigated, let alone punished."

Previously, top Bush administration officials defended the interrogation methods, saying they were legal and necessary to prevent terrorist attacks.

The report's release puts added pressure on the Obama administration, which has banned the use of waterboarding and similar techniques but has resisted calls to conduct legal inquiries to determine whether Bush administration officials broke laws.

The presence of medical personnel at CIA interrogation sites has been reported previously, but ICRC investigators found that their participation in some of the more harsh episodes to be a severe breach of medical ethics. The report said the officials were enlisted to ensure that the detainees did not die or suffer irreparable damage.

The report can be accessed at http://www.nybooks.com/icrc-report.pdf.
 
And in furthur news, GM to push Sedgways on the streets of NYC. :lol::lol::lol:

so you dont give a shit that it is now proven via the international red cross that we broke international law in how we treated detainees? How humane and truly caring of you willow tree, you are an exceptional human being!:clap2:



no, I personally don't give a shit that the iirc found we broke international law jackazz. It wasn't the iirc that got their azzes murdered on 9-11 was it? Did you hear those jackazzes come out on 9-12 and say the terrorist broke any fucking international laws huh jackazz?? well didyahuh? now go cry us a fucking river about "inhuman" treatment whydonchya?
 
Last edited:
Here's a picture of what I consider "inhuman" treatment. How about you?




 
And in furthur news, GM to push Sedgways on the streets of NYC. :lol::lol::lol:

so you dont give a shit that it is now proven via the international red cross that we broke international law in how we treated detainees? How humane and truly caring of you willow tree, you are an exceptional human being!:clap2:



no, I personally don't give a shit that the iirc found we broke international law jackazz. It wasn't the iirc that got their azzes murdered on 9-11 was it? Did you hear those jackazzes come out on 9-12 and say the terrorist broke any fucking international laws huh jackazz?? well didyahuh?
so it just proves what a non caring inhuman bitch you are.....:clap2:

and before you go there I care about what happened to those on 9/11 but that didnt give us carte blache to be cruel and in human to anyone that stood out different from us like in the book i read of actual accounts of detainees at gitmo who were treated with utter disrespect...like a 60 + year old crippled man who could barely walk but was considered an an "enemy combatant" who was made to stand without crutches for extended periods of time, made to take a bath in front of female soldiers as a daily humiliation ritual and was beaten.
 
Last edited:
And in furthur news, GM to push Sedgways on the streets of NYC. :lol::lol::lol:

so you dont give a shit that it is now proven via the international red cross that we broke international law in how we treated detainees? How humane and truly caring of you willow tree, you are an exceptional human being!:clap2:



no, I personally don't give a shit that the iirc found we broke international law jackazz. It wasn't the iirc that got their azzes murdered on 9-11 was it? Did you hear those jackazzes come out on 9-12 and say the terrorist broke any fucking international laws huh jackazz?? well didyahuh? now go cry us a fucking river about "inhuman" treatment whydonchya?

By the way, they're Segues.

The IRC didn't say that about the hijackers because everyone already knew that. However, the CIA also isn't a terrorist organization (er, wait a minute...) so if it broke international law then its important for US citizens to know that because we are a nation founded on ideals opposed to those which make it okay to torture people. Sorry, but I never believed the US should abandon its ideals and use the same methods used by the Spanish Inquisition, the Kamir Rouge, the Nazis, the USSR, and other sadistic inhumane people like kidnappers, child molesters and torturers.

If the terrorists are evil, and we allow our nation to torture people to try and beat the terrorists, then we've already lost.
 
so you dont give a shit that it is now proven via the international red cross that we broke international law in how we treated detainees? How humane and truly caring of you willow tree, you are an exceptional human being!:clap2:



no, I personally don't give a shit that the iirc found we broke international law jackazz. It wasn't the iirc that got their azzes murdered on 9-11 was it? Did you hear those jackazzes come out on 9-12 and say the terrorist broke any fucking international laws huh jackazz?? well didyahuh?
so it just proves what a non caring inhuman bitch you are.....:clap2:

and before you go there I care about what happened to those on 9/11 but that didnt give us carte blache to be cruel and in human to anyone that stood out different from us like in the book i read of actual accounts of detainees at gitmo who were treated with utter disrespect.. oh boo fucking hooo.like a 60 + year old crippled man who could barely walk but was considered an an "enemy combatant" who was made to stand without crutches for extended periods of time, made to take a bath in front of female soldiers as a daily humiliation ritual and was beaten.



I don't give a shit what you think as well as i don't give a shit what the IRC thinks.. like I said,, where the fuck were they on 9-12 doyathink? poor old mistreated terrorists.. you gonna give em a home in your neighborhood???
 
There you have it folks. The right has no respect for the law of the land (treaties signed by the US become the supreme law of the land as per the Constitution). They care only about politcal power.

The leader of their party and the US government sanctioned torure. A stain forever on the US and endless shame on the supporters of this international war criminal - GW Bush.
 
There you have it folks. The right has no respect for the law of the land (treaties signed by the US become the supreme law of the land as per the Constitution). They care only about politcal power.

The leader of their party and the US government sanctioned torure. A stain forever on the US and endless shame on the supporters of this international war criminal - GW Bush.



and the left will believe any old Blame AMerica first propaganda that corrput entities like the UN or the IRC spoons feeds them. Grow the fuck up whydonchya? omg the terrorists were treated with disrespect oh :eek:, but nary a fucking word from these IRC assholes when 3000 people were exploded, burned, incinerated or forced to jump to their deaths.. and I don't think we heard a fucking thing from the IRC when the Israelsi were and are subjected to daily rocket attacks.. oh fuck no,, and not a goddamned thing when the terrorists were running around beheading people.. oh fuck no,, but don't don't don't disresepct any terrorist for god's sake or we the LEFT will have a fucking coniption fit.
 
Last edited:
what proves that EVERY detainee at those camps was a terrorist....show me proof! alot were held there for years without proof of jackshit against them and whom really did NOTHING WRONG TO US AT ALL yet because they are "Muslim" or different from us in anyway they are criminals and fuck them all to hell! I got ya!
 
what proves that EVERY detainee at those camps was a terrorist....show me proof! alot were held there for years without proof of jackshit against them and whom really did NOTHING WRONG TO US AT ALL yet because they are "Muslim" or different from us in anyway they are criminals and fuck them all to hell! I got ya!




I never said any of that so "if you got me" it proves you are an IDIOT didyagetthat? :lol:
 
the i got ya was i understand what you mean...of course i was being sarcastic about that but your past statements in this here post prove that you dont care about them...lumping ALL muslims as terrorists and STILL going back to the mindless fearmongering of bush at mentioning 9-11 every chance you get. MANY of those held at those camps were/are innocent bystanders who were in the wrong place at the wrong time and still treated to torture, held for years without council or even seeing supposed evidence against them, but hey its all good, as long as we get those muslim terrorist fuckers that killed 3000 8 YEARS AGO!
 
the i got ya was i understand what you mean...of course i was being sarcastic about that but your past statements in this here post prove that you dont care about them...lumping ALL muslims as terrorists and STILL going back to the mindless fearmongering of bush at mentioning 9-11 every chance you get. MANY of those held at those camps were/are innocent bystanders who were in the wrong place at the wrong time and still treated to torture, held for years without council or even seeing supposed evidence against them, but hey its all good, as long as we get those muslim terrorist fuckers that killed 3000 8 YEARS AGO!



My statments prove only one thing. I care about the deaths of 3000 Americans, your statments mean you care about your beloved terrorists being inconvenienced or uncomfortable. that's what makes me more human than you.
 
the i got ya was i understand what you mean...of course i was being sarcastic about that but your past statements in this here post prove that you dont care about them...lumping ALL muslims as terrorists and STILL going back to the mindless fearmongering of bush at mentioning 9-11 every chance you get. MANY of those held at those camps were/are innocent bystanders who were in the wrong place at the wrong time and still treated to torture, held for years without council or even seeing supposed evidence against them, but hey its all good, as long as we get those muslim terrorist fuckers that killed 3000 8 YEARS AGO!



I'm betting you forgave them and cheered them all of about 8 minutes after the 3000 died. I'd be right too.
 
the i got ya was i understand what you mean...of course i was being sarcastic about that but your past statements in this here post prove that you dont care about them...lumping ALL muslims as terrorists and STILL going back to the mindless fearmongering of bush at mentioning 9-11 every chance you get. MANY of those held at those camps were/are innocent bystanders who were in the wrong place at the wrong time and still treated to torture, held for years without council or even seeing supposed evidence against them, but hey its all good, as long as we get those muslim terrorist fuckers that killed 3000 8 YEARS AGO!



My statments prove only one thing. I care about the deaths of 3000 Americans, your statments mean you care about your beloved terrorists being inconvenienced or uncomfortable. that's what makes me more human than you.

hey dumbass bitch.....I will say this one more time...I GRIEVED FOR THOSE THAT DIED ON 9-11 but that was 8 years ago and nothing else has happened so its time to move on and stop with the mindless fear mongering of continuing to bring that up every chance possible. And how is treating innocent people like they were treated at those camps(not saying all were but many were) avenging those losses
 
the i got ya was i understand what you mean...of course i was being sarcastic about that but your past statements in this here post prove that you dont care about them...lumping ALL muslims as terrorists and STILL going back to the mindless fearmongering of bush at mentioning 9-11 every chance you get. MANY of those held at those camps were/are innocent bystanders who were in the wrong place at the wrong time and still treated to torture, held for years without council or even seeing supposed evidence against them, but hey its all good, as long as we get those muslim terrorist fuckers that killed 3000 8 YEARS AGO!



My statments prove only one thing. I care about the deaths of 3000 Americans, your statments mean you care about your beloved terrorists being inconvenienced or uncomfortable. that's what makes me more human than you.

hey dumbass bitch.....I will say this one more time...I GRIEVED FOR THOSE THAT DIED ON 9-11 but that was 8 years ago and nothing else has happened so its time to move on and stop with the mindless fear mongering of continuing to bring that up every chance possible. And how is treating innocent people like they were treated at those camps(not saying all were but many were) avenging those losses



Funny you don't sound like you grieved for them half as much as you grieve for your beloved inconvenienced terrorists.. why doncha go to your source and look at the list of atrocities described therein and then come tell us which of those the 3000 who died so horribly on 9-11 would trade their lives for? I'll wait..
 
live in the past and fear monger all you like...just proves how narrow minded you are and if you really like me to i shall get lists and qoutes on things done to the people at gitmo...yet you will some how make it all ok for it to have been done so why bother!?;-P
 
live in the past and fear monger all you like...just proves how narrow minded you are and if you really like me to i shall get lists and qoutes on things done to the people at gitmo...yet you will some how make it all ok for it to have been done so why bother!?;-P




It's all right there in the pdf. file you posted DUmbass. I've asked you to review those "atrocities" and then tell me which ones the victims of the 9-11 attack would be willing to trade their lives for? Can't do that? It's simple really it is. Oh! and btw the age-old fear mongering moniker you use impresses me NOT.
 
Those who do not learn from the Past are doomed to repeat it. LLD. The left never learns so we are in for a repeat of WWII and the Carter years and probably another 9/11 type incident because you idiots think it's all about playing by rules that you idiots want to make up as you go along. Their were only 3 people water boarded all of them Were Al queada ops.

The International Red Cross has become a mouth piece for leftist nit wits. I accept their finding about as much as accept your pretenses to intellectual acumen wnich is to say not at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top