Intelligent minds...

manifold

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
57,723
Reaction score
8,639
Points
2,030
Location
your dreams
Intelligent minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Simple minds discuss people.


These generalizations qualify as ideas.

So intelligent minds, please discuss.
 
Only an idiot looks for intelligence on a message board.

True story.

:thup:
 
Intelligent minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Simple minds discuss people.


These generalizations qualify as ideas.

So intelligent minds, please discuss.
I heard you're an idiot.
 
Let's talk about you and Ravi........
(Which way did he go? Which way did he go? Where's the little bunny rabbit I saw on the TV screen yesterday morning? I'm gonna love him and hug him and name him George.)
 
intelligent minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Simple minds discuss people.


These generalizations qualify as ideas.

So intelligent minds, please discuss.

ya ya thats great.. But what I wanna know is whats with you little mani man and what was that whole thing with the mods all about ??
 
intelligent minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Simple minds discuss people.


These generalizations qualify as ideas.

So intelligent minds, please discuss.

ya ya thats great.. But what I wanna know is whats with you little mani man and what was that whole thing with the mods all about ??


:eusa_eh:
 
Funny, but wrong. :lol:

All minds generalize. It's essential for the learning process. Intelligent minds know this to be true. :)
 
Arguing on the internet is like bowling in the Special Olympics.



45701174.jpg


Even if you win, you're still a ******* retard.
 
Again funny, but this time mostly true.

However, if one defines winning to be learning something, that wouldn't be so retarded.
 
15th post
Again funny, but this time mostly true.

However, if one defines winning to be learning something, that wouldn't be so retarded.

Is that the ***** libtard definition of winning?

Because in my dictionary winning means beating your adversary to a bloody pulp (literally and/or figuratively)
 
Again funny, but this time mostly true.

However, if one defines winning to be learning something, that wouldn't be so retarded.

Is that the ***** libtard definition of winning?

Because in my dictionary winning means beating your adversary to a bloody pulp (literally and/or figuratively)


Well Geez, with that Definition, and with the Government getting bigger and ever-more Socialist, it appears as though Conservatives haven't won much of anything in the past 30 or-so years, huh?

I didn't know that conservatives considered the government an adversary. In fact it's quite the opposite. Repugnantcans and so called conservatives have grown the government just as much as the Dimocrat libtard moonbats.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom