Defraud the American people?'Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.then show the charges and link us up.Hacking a computer is…and Stone was in concert with the hackers. The trial will uncover that (as his tweets have pretty much). Now the question becomes, “why was stone doing it”. I’m sure he won’t flip on Cohen…err I mean Trump. LOL
There are no claims that Stone was in cahoots with hackers, and he hasn't been charged with any crimes related to hacking.
You are beyond dumb.
Sure...
Lol
all you gotta do.
And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.
Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”
“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”
(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)
In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”
“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.
“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.
Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.
“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”
Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”
Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.
“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.
Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.
You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.
Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.
Moron
You could be right. Only time and mueller will tell.