Intel operation against Trump still going strong

[sealybobo]

Hacking a computer is…and Stone was in concert with the hackers. The trial will uncover that (as his tweets have pretty much). Now the question becomes, “why was stone doing it”. I’m sure he won’t flip on Cohen…err I mean Trump. LOL

There are no claims that Stone was in cahoots with hackers, and he hasn't been charged with any crimes related to hacking.

You are beyond dumb.

Sure...

Lol

then show the charges and link us up.

all you gotta do.

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

Defraud the American people?

You could be right. Only time and mueller will tell.

 

[DandyDonovan]

There are no claims that Stone was in cahoots with hackers, and he hasn't been charged with any crimes related to hacking.

You are beyond dumb.

Sure...

Lol

then show the charges and link us up.

all you gotta do.

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

Defraud the American people?

You could be right. Only time and mueller will tell.

Defraud the American people? Can you point to the statute that applies and explain how you believe it was violated? Then of course we can discuss WHO did it.

 

[iceberg]

Sure...

Lol

then show the charges and link us up.

all you gotta do.

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

Defraud the American people?

You could be right. Only time and mueller will tell.

Defraud the American people? Can you point to the statute that applies and explain how you believe it was violated? Then of course we can discuss WHO did it.

they just keep shouting shit out to stay warm at this point.

 

[sealybobo]

Sure...

Lol

then show the charges and link us up.

all you gotta do.

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

i didn't bother to read his keyboard diarrhea, but i'm betting he didn't list a single crime by name and action.

Of course he didn't.

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

 

[DandyDonovan]

then show the charges and link us up.

all you gotta do.

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

i didn't bother to read his keyboard diarrhea, but i'm betting he didn't list a single crime by name and action.

Of course he didn't.

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

We do know that it was Stormy's husband who threatened her lol

 

[sealybobo]

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

i didn't bother to read his keyboard diarrhea, but i'm betting he didn't list a single crime by name and action.

Of course he didn't.

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

We do know that it was Stormy's husband who threatened her lol

Why argue? If mueller had nothing this would be over. It’s not over though is it?

Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. That shit went on and on but went nowhere’s

What was ken Starr originally looking for?

And there were no wmds just ask trump.

 

[sealybobo]

then show the charges and link us up.

all you gotta do.

Just wait. For example Don Jr. might get indicted.

And in the end even if they get caught colluding with russia you'll say nothing they did was against the law.

Almost all legal scholars, however, warn not to put much stock in the recent claim “collusion is not a crime.”

“I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime,” Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said in a July 30 “Fox & Friends” interview. “Collusion is not a crime.” The same day, on CNN’s “New Day,” Giuliani said, “You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.”

(Giuliani was referring to the July 13 indictment that charged 12 Russian military intelligence officers with hacking into “the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.”)

In a tweet, the president repeated Giuliani’s claim that “collusion is not a crime.”

“Don’t be fooled by word games,” Victoria Nourse, a professor at Georgetown Law, told us via email. “There is no legal term ‘collusion.’ The legal term for collusion is the crime of conspiracy. If you agree to kill someone and take a step toward that (hired the killer, or encouraged the killer, met with the killer) you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.

“So, if you agree to defraud the U.S. or disrupt the elections (even if it’s not with the Russians) and you take a step forward (any step….meetings, payments etc.), that’s conspiracy,” Nourse said.

Stephen Schulhofer, a law professor at New York University, said the act of collusion can be either benign or criminal, depending on the circumstance.

“One of the most commonly used provisions of the U.S. Code, 18 USC §371, makes it a federal crime for two or more people to conspire ‘to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,'” Schulhofer told us via email. “Agreeing (colluding) with someone for a perfectly lawful purpose, like arranging a game of golf or tennis, is not a crime. But colluding with the Russians, i.e. agreeing to cooperate, encourage or assist them in any way in pursuing anything they were doing that was illegal, is most certainly a crime.”

Or, as Sklansky told us, “Whether it is a crime depends on what you are colluding about.”

Sklansky also challenged Giuliani’s assertion that the only real crime was the hacking of the DNC servers.

“It’s a red herring to suggest that hacking is the only crime that could have been committed here,” Sklansky said.

Hacking is one crime, he said, but you don’t have to be guilty of hacking to be guilty of obstruction of justice or criminal conspiracy or soliciting a foreign agent in a campaign.

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

Defraud the American people?

You could be right. Only time and mueller will tell.

Defraud the American people? Can you point to the statute that applies and explain how you believe it was violated? Then of course we can discuss WHO did it.

they just keep shouting shit out to stay warm at this point.

It’d be great if mueller called a press conference after trump looses re election and says sorry but I got nuthin.

 

[DandyDonovan]

'

You're an idiot and so Skiansky, collusion is NEVER a crime (except in antitrust law) the term you are looking for is conspiracy, and in order for a conspiracy to be illegal, it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime. If you and I conspire to post together at 11 PM , that's not a crime. If you and conspire to rob a bank, that's a crime, we've conspired to commit a crime.

Therefor you would have to prove that someone, anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians to do something, anything that is illegal. So far you can't even prove that the Russians did anything illegal , let alone that any Americans conspired to do so with them.

Moron

i didn't bother to read his keyboard diarrhea, but i'm betting he didn't list a single crime by name and action.

Of course he didn't.

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

We do know that it was Stormy's husband who threatened her lol

Why argue? If mueller had nothing this would be over. It’s not over though is it?

Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. That shit went on and on but went nowhere’s

What was ken Starr originally looking for?

And there were no wmds just ask trump.

LOL you dont understand the nature of DC if you believe people here will EVER do their jobs as quickly and efficiently as possible and them move on.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And let's not forget that Russian hackers tried to hack Hillary's email server the day Trump told them to do so.

No they didn't. They hacked the DNC SERVER on the very day Trump told them to find Hillary's emails.

And, from just above, posted in the thread:

Russians tried to hack Clinton server on day Trump urged email search
Russian spies began trying to hack Hillary Clinton’s personal email server on the very day Donald Trump urged the Russian government to find emails Clinton had erased, prosecutors said on Friday

 

[DandyDonovan]

And let's not forget that Russian hackers tried to hack Hillary's email server the day Trump told them to do so.

No they didn't. They hacked the DNC SERVER on the very day Trump told them to find Hillary's emails.

And, from just above, posted in the thread:

Russians tried to hack Clinton server on day Trump urged email search
Russian spies began trying to hack Hillary Clinton’s personal email server on the very day Donald Trump urged the Russian government to find emails Clinton had erased, prosecutors said on Friday

But read the god damned article and they are NOT talking about the private email server that was in the bathroom of her home, which is the server that at one time had the missing 33K emails on it. THAT server had been offline and in FBI custody for MONTHS when Trump made his speech AND the missing emails Trump referenced weren't even on it, they had been deleted.

Damn you people are both stupid and dishonest.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And let's not forget that Russian hackers tried to hack Hillary's email server the day Trump told them to do so.

No they didn't. They hacked the DNC SERVER on the very day Trump told them to find Hillary's emails.

And, from just above, posted in the thread:

Russians tried to hack Clinton server on day Trump urged email search
Russian spies began trying to hack Hillary Clinton’s personal email server on the very day Donald Trump urged the Russian government to find emails Clinton had erased, prosecutors said on Friday

But read the god damned article and they are NOT talking about the private email server that was in the bathroom of her home, which is the server that at one time had the missing 33K emails on it. THAT server had been offline and in FBI custody for MONTHS when Trump made his speech AND the missing emails Trump referenced weren't even on it, they had been deleted.

Damn you people are both stupid and dishonest.

And yet, all trump cultist tantrums aside, Russia did, in fact, try to hack her personal email server the day Trump asked them to search for the emails.

 

[DandyDonovan]

And let's not forget that Russian hackers tried to hack Hillary's email server the day Trump told them to do so.

No they didn't. They hacked the DNC SERVER on the very day Trump told them to find Hillary's emails.

And, from just above, posted in the thread:

Russians tried to hack Clinton server on day Trump urged email search
Russian spies began trying to hack Hillary Clinton’s personal email server on the very day Donald Trump urged the Russian government to find emails Clinton had erased, prosecutors said on Friday

But read the god damned article and they are NOT talking about the private email server that was in the bathroom of her home, which is the server that at one time had the missing 33K emails on it. THAT server had been offline and in FBI custody for MONTHS when Trump made his speech AND the missing emails Trump referenced weren't even on it, they had been deleted.

Damn you people are both stupid and dishonest.

And yet, all trump cultist tantrums aside, Russia did, in fact, try to hack her personal email server the day Trump asked them to search for the emails.

That fact is in dispute. What is NOT in dispute is that the server that contained the emails Trump discussed that day was already offline AND those emails were not on it, so why the fuck would Russia hack a server to get documents that Trump wanted when that server wasn't online and those emails had already been deleted anyway?

You see, any person who was truly honest could and would say yes Trump was saying Russia turn over those emails you hacked at some point in the past , and then you could discuss whether Trump knew for fact that Russia had hacked them in the past. But , as per usual you leftist retards overplayed your hand and want to pretend like Russia hacked those emails that day when Trump asked them too. That simply isn't true , and can't be true because we know for FACT that those emails were deleted off the server AND we know that the FBI had the server off line for months before that speech.

Are you capable of admitting that yes it is impossible that the Russians hacked that server and got those emails that day?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is NOT in dispute is that the server that contained the emails Trump discussed that day was already offline

Neato!

 

[DandyDonovan]

What is NOT in dispute is that the server that contained the emails Trump discussed that day was already offline

Neato!

so you are simply incapable of acknowledging facts. Got it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is NOT in dispute is that the server that contained the emails Trump discussed that day was already offline

Neato!

so you are simply incapable of acknowledging facts. Got it.

I didn't dispute the facts...
Is there ever a moment that you are not in an apoplectic state of agitation?

 

[sealybobo]

i didn't bother to read his keyboard diarrhea, but i'm betting he didn't list a single crime by name and action.

Of course he didn't.

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

We do know that it was Stormy's husband who threatened her lol

Why argue? If mueller had nothing this would be over. It’s not over though is it?

Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. That shit went on and on but went nowhere’s

What was ken Starr originally looking for?

And there were no wmds just ask trump.

LOL you dont understand the nature of DC if you believe people here will EVER do their jobs as quickly and efficiently as possible and them move on.

So let’s have them build a wall for $5 billion

 

[DandyDonovan]

What is NOT in dispute is that the server that contained the emails Trump discussed that day was already offline

Neato!

so you are simply incapable of acknowledging facts. Got it.

I didn't dispute the facts...
Is there ever a moment that you are not in an apoplectic state of agitation?

If you don't dispute facts then why did you even disagreeably respond to me claiming that what I posted wasn't true?

No, I'm in a full time apoplectic state over the failure of the education system in this country that has resulted in a sheep like population led by idiots.

 

[DandyDonovan]

Of course he didn't.

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

We do know that it was Stormy's husband who threatened her lol

Why argue? If mueller had nothing this would be over. It’s not over though is it?

Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. That shit went on and on but went nowhere’s

What was ken Starr originally looking for?

And there were no wmds just ask trump.

LOL you dont understand the nature of DC if you believe people here will EVER do their jobs as quickly and efficiently as possible and them move on.

So let’s have them build a wall for $5 billion

If you held that stance for other issues I could take you seriously.

 

[sealybobo]

Would you be shocked to learn we do know who threatened stormy Daniel and her baby?

And why is trump witness tampering?

This is getting good

We do know that it was Stormy's husband who threatened her lol

Why argue? If mueller had nothing this would be over. It’s not over though is it?

Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. That shit went on and on but went nowhere’s

What was ken Starr originally looking for?

And there were no wmds just ask trump.

LOL you dont understand the nature of DC if you believe people here will EVER do their jobs as quickly and efficiently as possible and them move on.

So let’s have them build a wall for $5 billion

If you held that stance for other issues I could take you seriously.

Ah I got Cha with that one.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Reminder: the republican party's former financial chief michael cohen is now a felon. It was the deep state