Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The media deemed what happened on 1/6 as an insurrection? They also said multiple people died. Media lies. How many people died during the defund the police BLM George Floyd/ fentanyl overdose thing? Being that China funds the democrats and the fentanyl industry.
The insurrection happened on November 3rd.
Um, no. Because democracy died that day.The insurrection happened on November 3rd.
Because the Trump cult doesn't give a shit about the constitution and the republic.
Democrats burned down cities for months and then they demonize Trump. Democrats burn down cities for months over false claims of racism...Jesse Smollett. Racism! Insurrection? Who is really the bad guy here?
Democrats burned down cities for months and then they demonize Trump. Democrats burn down cities for months over false claims of racism...Jesse Smollett. Racism! Insurrection? Who is really the bad guy here?
but endless liberals rioting an destroying is just peachy keen and fineA better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
I'm not sure you understand the nature of the constitution. You mentioned the first amendment as an example of what we should adhere to, but that amendment wasn't added to the constitution until more than 4 years after the original document was ratified. Wouldn't that be an example of ignoring the original document like you were complaining about? The framers of the constitution knew that their specific document wouldn't be adequate to deal with challenges that would be faced in the future, and included procedures to make the changes needed to meet those challenges. If you want to complain about the way our constitution has been interpreted, then that is your right, but to say any adaptation based on interpretations is not allowed or even condoned by the text of the constitution shows you don't understand the original intent of the framers.
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
I'm not sure you understand the nature of the constitution. You mentioned the first amendment as an example of what we should adhere to, but that amendment wasn't added to the constitution until more than 4 years after the original document was ratified. Wouldn't that be an example of ignoring the original document like you were complaining about? The framers of the constitution knew that their specific document wouldn't be adequate to deal with challenges that would be faced in the future, and included procedures to make the changes needed to meet those challenges. If you want to complain about the way our constitution has been interpreted, then that is your right, but to say any adaptation based on interpretations is not allowed or even condoned by the text of the constitution shows you don't understand the original intent of the framers.
Yes, the Founders admitted and allowed for changes to the Constitution. That is why they provided the Amendment Process. But every amendment has been interpreted to death. None of them are worth the shadow of the words that are written. Take any one you want.
Let’s take the Second. At the time it was written, when a Criminal was finished with their prison sentence, they were allowed to once again arm themselves. There was no prohibition against anyone walking into a store and buying a gun. Now, we’ve decided that the Framers never intended this, or that. We’ve decided that the Constitution allows us to penalize people for life over any crime. We take pride in this attitude. A restriction that is now part of the Founders intent, nor the letter of the Amendment, but it’s fine. The Supreme Court said so.
We hate the Constitution. We hate what it was always meant to represent. Freedom. We hate what it was intended to be, a restriction on Federal Government Power. We hate not being able to tell someone you can’t do that by passing a law prohibiting it. We detest the idea that we can’t rewrite history to say that this, this abuse of the limits on power, is exactly what the Constitution says we can and must do. We get furious when someone tells us that our ideals are unconstitutional. We denounce anyone on the other side as Fascists, or Socialists, but we all do it.
Look at the exceptions for secure in the person and papers. We can’t stand the idea that the guilty person might go free if we don’t find a whole new exception or loophole. So we came up with dozens, and then hundreds of exceptions. Each exception built onto the back of the one before. Now, you really aren’t secure in anything except what is between your two ears, assuming there is anything there. We even have people in jail for not testifying against themselves. And that is just fine. Perfectly fine. It’s what the Founders would have wanted. We’ll call it contempt of court.
We hate the Constitution. We hate it with a passion. We blame the other political ideology for screwing up the world because they don’t see it the right way. We aren’t abusing it, we aren’t destroying it, we’re interpreting it.
And it happens every day. The Constitution is meaningless. And we celebrate it. We defend that meaningless reality.
So yes, the 6th of January was one of the death rattles of the Republic. It’s Very nearly dead now.
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
I'm not sure you understand the nature of the constitution. You mentioned the first amendment as an example of what we should adhere to, but that amendment wasn't added to the constitution until more than 4 years after the original document was ratified. Wouldn't that be an example of ignoring the original document like you were complaining about? The framers of the constitution knew that their specific document wouldn't be adequate to deal with challenges that would be faced in the future, and included procedures to make the changes needed to meet those challenges. If you want to complain about the way our constitution has been interpreted, then that is your right, but to say any adaptation based on interpretations is not allowed or even condoned by the text of the constitution shows you don't understand the original intent of the framers.
Yes, the Founders admitted and allowed for changes to the Constitution. That is why they provided the Amendment Process. But every amendment has been interpreted to death. None of them are worth the shadow of the words that are written. Take any one you want.
Let’s take the Second. At the time it was written, when a Criminal was finished with their prison sentence, they were allowed to once again arm themselves. There was no prohibition against anyone walking into a store and buying a gun. Now, we’ve decided that the Framers never intended this, or that. We’ve decided that the Constitution allows us to penalize people for life over any crime. We take pride in this attitude. A restriction that is now part of the Founders intent, nor the letter of the Amendment, but it’s fine. The Supreme Court said so.
We hate the Constitution. We hate what it was always meant to represent. Freedom. We hate what it was intended to be, a restriction on Federal Government Power. We hate not being able to tell someone you can’t do that by passing a law prohibiting it. We detest the idea that we can’t rewrite history to say that this, this abuse of the limits on power, is exactly what the Constitution says we can and must do. We get furious when someone tells us that our ideals are unconstitutional. We denounce anyone on the other side as Fascists, or Socialists, but we all do it.
Look at the exceptions for secure in the person and papers. We can’t stand the idea that the guilty person might go free if we don’t find a whole new exception or loophole. So we came up with dozens, and then hundreds of exceptions. Each exception built onto the back of the one before. Now, you really aren’t secure in anything except what is between your two ears, assuming there is anything there. We even have people in jail for not testifying against themselves. And that is just fine. Perfectly fine. It’s what the Founders would have wanted. We’ll call it contempt of court.
We hate the Constitution. We hate it with a passion. We blame the other political ideology for screwing up the world because they don’t see it the right way. We aren’t abusing it, we aren’t destroying it, we’re interpreting it.
And it happens every day. The Constitution is meaningless. And we celebrate it. We defend that meaningless reality.
So yes, the 6th of January was one of the death rattles of the Republic. It’s Very nearly dead now.
So you admit all has been done as provided for in the constitution. Looks like the constitution is what you have a problem with. How long have you opposed the constitution?
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
I'm not sure you understand the nature of the constitution. You mentioned the first amendment as an example of what we should adhere to, but that amendment wasn't added to the constitution until more than 4 years after the original document was ratified. Wouldn't that be an example of ignoring the original document like you were complaining about? The framers of the constitution knew that their specific document wouldn't be adequate to deal with challenges that would be faced in the future, and included procedures to make the changes needed to meet those challenges. If you want to complain about the way our constitution has been interpreted, then that is your right, but to say any adaptation based on interpretations is not allowed or even condoned by the text of the constitution shows you don't understand the original intent of the framers.
Yes, the Founders admitted and allowed for changes to the Constitution. That is why they provided the Amendment Process. But every amendment has been interpreted to death. None of them are worth the shadow of the words that are written. Take any one you want.
Let’s take the Second. At the time it was written, when a Criminal was finished with their prison sentence, they were allowed to once again arm themselves. There was no prohibition against anyone walking into a store and buying a gun. Now, we’ve decided that the Framers never intended this, or that. We’ve decided that the Constitution allows us to penalize people for life over any crime. We take pride in this attitude. A restriction that is now part of the Founders intent, nor the letter of the Amendment, but it’s fine. The Supreme Court said so.
We hate the Constitution. We hate what it was always meant to represent. Freedom. We hate what it was intended to be, a restriction on Federal Government Power. We hate not being able to tell someone you can’t do that by passing a law prohibiting it. We detest the idea that we can’t rewrite history to say that this, this abuse of the limits on power, is exactly what the Constitution says we can and must do. We get furious when someone tells us that our ideals are unconstitutional. We denounce anyone on the other side as Fascists, or Socialists, but we all do it.
Look at the exceptions for secure in the person and papers. We can’t stand the idea that the guilty person might go free if we don’t find a whole new exception or loophole. So we came up with dozens, and then hundreds of exceptions. Each exception built onto the back of the one before. Now, you really aren’t secure in anything except what is between your two ears, assuming there is anything there. We even have people in jail for not testifying against themselves. And that is just fine. Perfectly fine. It’s what the Founders would have wanted. We’ll call it contempt of court.
We hate the Constitution. We hate it with a passion. We blame the other political ideology for screwing up the world because they don’t see it the right way. We aren’t abusing it, we aren’t destroying it, we’re interpreting it.
And it happens every day. The Constitution is meaningless. And we celebrate it. We defend that meaningless reality.
So yes, the 6th of January was one of the death rattles of the Republic. It’s Very nearly dead now.
So you admit all has been done as provided for in the constitution. Looks like the constitution is what you have a problem with. How long have you opposed the constitution?
Where in the Second Amendment does it say that you can restrict a person from buying a gun because he had been in prison before? Where does it say that in the Federalist Papers?
Where does it say in the Fourth Amendment that a cop can search a car? Based upon a hunch?
Where in the fifth Amendment does it say a man can be held in jail for years for refusing to testify against himself?
I love the Constitution. I love the idea of freedom. I love the intent of restricting the Government and protecting the individual. You on the other hand think all those abuses are exactly what is not only allowed but the intent of the Constitution.
A better term would be attempted Coup d’etat. For that is what was the goal. To capture, intimidate, or kill enough of the Congress to prevent Biden from being properly certified as the Election Winner.
But since most of our citizens have no idea what a Coup is, Insurrection is a more easily understood term by the Masses.
It was an attempted overthrow of the election process. Using violence as the weapon.
It was a first in American History. And as sure a sign of the death rattle of the republic as we are liable to get. But we have done it to ourselves, and the Republic is doomed. Not because Biden was elected. Not because of the impeachment. Those are symptoms, not the cause. The cause is us.
We detest the Constitution. One and all of us. We detest it because it doesn’t say what we think it should say. It doesn’t mean what we think it should mean. Left, Right, doesn’t matter. We hate the damned document. We’ve hated it for generations. And we’re not going to change now. Nobody respects it. Nobody honors it. And nobody loves it all.
Look at our laws. They are written to get around those restrictions placed upon us by our Forefathers. The Courts create loopholes and exceptions. All in the interest of whatever they are blathering about now. A document written so anyone can read and comprehend it has been mutated by verbage from legal minds to mean exactly what it doesn’t say. Most of the time it now means exactly what it says should never happen.
The First Amendment doesn’t say the Supreme Court shall rule as invalid if it violates the various restrictions. It says Congress shall pass no law.
I said we were to blame. We are. We vote the same parties all the time, and those parties love, or claim to, only parts of the Constitution. So we put the same fools back in office, instead of voting them out. Right and Left.
Twenty years ago, I said we would be better served if we handled Congress like Jury Duty. You get a letter in the mail, picked at random, and you are a Congressman for the next two years. You live in Government Housing. Every congressman gets an identical apartment. Every senator gets an identical apartment. They couldn’t wait to go on recess and go home.
About the time they got comfortable with the power, it was time to head home, your tenure is over.
I'm not sure you understand the nature of the constitution. You mentioned the first amendment as an example of what we should adhere to, but that amendment wasn't added to the constitution until more than 4 years after the original document was ratified. Wouldn't that be an example of ignoring the original document like you were complaining about? The framers of the constitution knew that their specific document wouldn't be adequate to deal with challenges that would be faced in the future, and included procedures to make the changes needed to meet those challenges. If you want to complain about the way our constitution has been interpreted, then that is your right, but to say any adaptation based on interpretations is not allowed or even condoned by the text of the constitution shows you don't understand the original intent of the framers.
Yes, the Founders admitted and allowed for changes to the Constitution. That is why they provided the Amendment Process. But every amendment has been interpreted to death. None of them are worth the shadow of the words that are written. Take any one you want.
Let’s take the Second. At the time it was written, when a Criminal was finished with their prison sentence, they were allowed to once again arm themselves. There was no prohibition against anyone walking into a store and buying a gun. Now, we’ve decided that the Framers never intended this, or that. We’ve decided that the Constitution allows us to penalize people for life over any crime. We take pride in this attitude. A restriction that is now part of the Founders intent, nor the letter of the Amendment, but it’s fine. The Supreme Court said so.
We hate the Constitution. We hate what it was always meant to represent. Freedom. We hate what it was intended to be, a restriction on Federal Government Power. We hate not being able to tell someone you can’t do that by passing a law prohibiting it. We detest the idea that we can’t rewrite history to say that this, this abuse of the limits on power, is exactly what the Constitution says we can and must do. We get furious when someone tells us that our ideals are unconstitutional. We denounce anyone on the other side as Fascists, or Socialists, but we all do it.
Look at the exceptions for secure in the person and papers. We can’t stand the idea that the guilty person might go free if we don’t find a whole new exception or loophole. So we came up with dozens, and then hundreds of exceptions. Each exception built onto the back of the one before. Now, you really aren’t secure in anything except what is between your two ears, assuming there is anything there. We even have people in jail for not testifying against themselves. And that is just fine. Perfectly fine. It’s what the Founders would have wanted. We’ll call it contempt of court.
We hate the Constitution. We hate it with a passion. We blame the other political ideology for screwing up the world because they don’t see it the right way. We aren’t abusing it, we aren’t destroying it, we’re interpreting it.
And it happens every day. The Constitution is meaningless. And we celebrate it. We defend that meaningless reality.
So yes, the 6th of January was one of the death rattles of the Republic. It’s Very nearly dead now.
So you admit all has been done as provided for in the constitution. Looks like the constitution is what you have a problem with. How long have you opposed the constitution?
Where in the Second Amendment does it say that you can restrict a person from buying a gun because he had been in prison before? Where does it say that in the Federalist Papers?
Where does it say in the Fourth Amendment that a cop can search a car? Based upon a hunch?
Where in the fifth Amendment does it say a man can be held in jail for years for refusing to testify against himself?
I love the Constitution. I love the idea of freedom. I love the intent of restricting the Government and protecting the individual. You on the other hand think all those abuses are exactly what is not only allowed but the intent of the Constitution.
I'm pretty sure searching cars isn't mentioned anywhere in the constitution, because they weren't invented yet. That's why the framers included provisions for amendments, and gave the Supreme Court the authority to interpret the constitution to cover questions the constitution didn't directly address, like searching cars. I gotta ask again, how long have you opposed the constitution?
