jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,100
- 34,886
- 2,180
I’d ask congress firstThat's why congress needs to ask him why he didn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d ask congress firstThat's why congress needs to ask him why he didn't.
The difference is that presidents are allowed to consult with anybody Judges are barred from ex-parte communications.If Hunter Biden's actions have no bearing on the President, why would the actions of Thomas's wife have any bearing on him?
Got caught in your own web!!The difference is that presidents are allowed to consult with anybody Judges are barred from ex-parte communications.
Congress needs to get the facts, before they take any sort of action.I’d ask congress first
What moves did Hunter Biden make to affect any election?
The difference is that presidents are allowed to consult with anybody Judges are barred from ex-parte communications.
Maybe you can't read.Got caught in your own web!!
These are thinking man’s questions. Except emotional outburst name calling as your “answer”When did Ginny Thomas become a judge?
There was that dissenting opinion in the courts 8-1 decision against Trump.What ruling by Thomas was handed down based on his wife's politics?
Well she was caught sleeping with the judge.When did Ginny Thomas become a judge?
Again. What is it you are referring to?Maybe you can't read.
Presidents are allowed to discuss issues, both private and policy with anyone. There is no limit to who can write to, or talk to the president. Look at how Trump took advice from Steve Bannon after he left the white house, or from his corrupt disbarred lawyer.
Meanwhile judges are prohibited by statute from ex-parte communications.
So that makes her one?Well she was caught sleeping with the judge.
Read the OP, read the thread.Again. What is it you are referring to?
That may be both illegal influence and ex-parte communication.So that makes her one?
Again, what are you referring to?Read the OP, read the thread.
Or not .That may be both illegal influence and ex-parte communication.
Read the OP, read the thread.Again, what are you referring to?
Again, what are you referring to?Read the OP, read the thread.
Well fk dude go arrest them. What are you waiting for?Why is it that nobody even knows the spouses of judges, and justices?
Because the judge tries to refrain them from getting involved in matters that can come before his court.