jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,042
- 34,854
- 2,180
What case is she working on for Trump?The difference is that presidents are allowed to consult with anybody Judges are barred from ex-parte communications.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What case is she working on for Trump?The difference is that presidents are allowed to consult with anybody Judges are barred from ex-parte communications.
You don't arrest, you impeach.Well fk dude go arrest them. What are you waiting for?
Overturning the 2020 presidential election.What case is she working on for Trump?
Tell congress!!! Hurry along. We know how much demofks enjoy cheatingYou don't arrest, you impeach.
Or I can discuss it, as the subject of the OPTell congress!!! Hurry along
Why? You have no case?Or I can discuss it, as the subject of the OP
Isnt' that to be debated?Why? You have no case?
Doosh pie.![]()
Ginni Thomas' emails deepen her involvement in 2020 election
Newly discovered emails show that Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, was more deeply involved in baseless efforts to overturn the 2020 election than previously known.apnews.com
The revelations first published by The Washington Post on Friday show that Thomas was more involved than previously known in efforts, based on unsubstantiated claims of fraud, to overturn Biden’s victory and keep then-President Donald Trump in office.
In the days after The Associated Press and other news organizations called the presidential election for Biden, Thomas emailed two lawmakers in Arizona to urge them to choose “a clean slate of Electors” and “stand strong in the face of political and media pressure.” The AP obtained the emails under the state’s open records law.
Thomas also had written to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the weeks following the election encouraging him to work to overturn Biden’s victory and keep Trump in office, according to text messages first reported by the Post and CBS News.
Do you think this is enough to impeach Clarence Thomas and replace him with a Biden-backed liberal justice? Thoughts?
You haven’t stated a case to debate?Isnt' that to be debated?
DooshThey should just increase the size of the court. America is broken and the institutions need updating.
We can debate but not according to republicansDoosh pie.
Why? You have no case?
What about barred ex-parte communications?You haven’t stated a case to debate?
Debate what?We can debate but not according to republicans
Why?They should just increase the size of the court. America is broken and the institutions need updating.
For what? I asked you and you didn’t state the case she was working on.What about barred ex-parte communications?
As I said ex-parte communicationsDebate what?
They should just increase the size of the court. America is broken and the institutions need updating.
To keep up with the times, and with the workload. There are now 13 circuits, not 9. And a justice has to be put in charge of each circuit.Why?
What time?To keep up with the times, and with the workload. There are now 13 circuits, not 9. And a justice has to be put in charge of each circuit.
For what? I asked you and you didn’t state the case she was working on.
Overturning the 2020 presidential election.
Including communication with Arizona politicians and the presidents chief of staff.