Instead of Jobs Bill, House Explores Bill on NONEXISTENT EPA REGS

[AmericanFirst]

The jobs bill was tabled in the senate, it has yet to go to the congressional house.

So that's probably why they are not debating it. DUMBASS!!!

i realize it's beyond your comprehension, but the reason the senate took the jobs bill first (which they AREN'T supposed to do) is because the House nutters figue if there are no jobs, the president loses.

That should clarify things ... even for subliterates like you.

then WHY are there 20 or so jobs related bills passed in the House, now sitting on Reids desk in the Senate?

You will wait all night for her to answer that one, she has to figure out a good lie first.

 

[hboats]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

 

[Bfgrn]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

From your linked article...

Cathy Milbourn, a spokeswoman for the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C., told the Democrat-Herald: “It’s too early in the review process to know whether or not EPA will revise the coarse particulate standard and, therefore, it is too soon to know how a possible revised standard will be implemented.”

Milbourn added the EPA staff will discuss “the range of policy options that could be supported by the currently available scientific and technical information for protecting health and welfare from exposures to fine and coarse particle pollution.”

The EPA will issue a final policy document in September and the proposed rule by February 2011. Final action on the issue will be taken in October 2011.

Read more: EPA to propose dust restrictions

 

[Samson]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

Unbelievable.

Someone read the whole article from the Washington Post?

 

[Bfgrn]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

Unbelievable.

Someone read the whole article from the Washington Post?

Did you? Maybe a dictionary is a better starting place.

Bill to ban phantom EPA dust rule approved by House panel

Rule:

1) a principle or regulation governing conduct, action, procedure, arrangement, etc.

The EPA’s new dust rule did not exist. It never did.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Hey Ollie, did you READ the article you posted? IT would be a good idea.

Well I read it over my morning coffee, that still doesn't answer the question.....

What are you attempting to say?

What I am attempting to say? You ASKED: "Who do you blame this on?" WHO does the article blame?

Think about it, the city has been run by democrats since 1978. They blame the poverty on Everybody except themselves, but I'm not asking who the local democrats blame this dismal rating on.

 

[Bfgrn]

Well I read it over my morning coffee, that still doesn't answer the question.....

What are you attempting to say?

What I am attempting to say? You ASKED: "Who do you blame this on?" WHO does the article blame?

Think about it, the city has been run by democrats since 1978. They blame the poverty on Everybody except themselves, but I'm not asking who the local democrats blame this dismal rating on.

Think about it Ollie, the article says:

The Brookings report shows a similar trend across the country. It stems from unemployment and underemployment, which are also a national problem.

...the report’s findings make it clear that local, state, and national policies, from land-use and economic development to providing safety-net services, need to be reconsidered from a regional perspective to address the situation.

What is manifesting in Youngstown reflects the lost decade of job creation under Bush.

 

[SFC Ollie]

What I am attempting to say? You ASKED: "Who do you blame this on?" WHO does the article blame?

Think about it, the city has been run by democrats since 1978. They blame the poverty on Everybody except themselves, but I'm not asking who the local democrats blame this dismal rating on.

Think about it Ollie, the article says:

The Brookings report shows a similar trend across the country. It stems from unemployment and underemployment, which are also a national problem.

...the report’s findings make it clear that local, state, and national policies, from land-use and economic development to providing safety-net services, need to be reconsidered from a regional perspective to address the situation.

What is manifesting in Youngstown reflects the lost decade of job creation under Bush.

LOL Bush, Youngstown lost most of it's manufacturing base when the Mills closed in the 70's and 80's. As we can see with the country under Obama Youngstown under the Democrats has not recovered.
I wonder how many of the top (or bottom I suppose) cities have a similar history of leadership, or lack there of...........

 

[jillian]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

 

[Samson]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

The House has passed Lots of legislation against rules that don't exist.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

But per the evidence in this thread, it played perfectly to the rightist base, as planned.

 

[The T]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

The House has passed Lots of legislation against rules that don't exist.

So...let us cut to the chase...and abolish the EPA.

Simple.

 

[Samson]

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

But per the evidence in this thread, it played perfectly to the rightist base, as planned.

From the washington Post article:

Farm dust — the stuff at the center of this story — contains things such as windblown dirt, bits of last year’s cornstalks and manure dried down to powder. It is an ancient fact of farm life.

By the EPA’s rules, it is also pollution.
The EPA lumps it in with soot from power plants as “coarse-particle pollution.” The agency limits how much of this can be in the air, because the particles can cause heart and lung damage.

.... But last fall, an EPA advisory panel raised worries that more farmers could be affected. It recommended that the agency tighten standards, potentially leading to crackdowns elsewhere

The Legislation proposed was designed to preempt this moronic Agency.

 

[Samson]

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

The House has passed Lots of legislation against rules that don't exist.

So...let us cut to the chase...and abolish the EPA.

Simple.

Well, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Would you settle for simply cutting the EPA's budget by 50%?

 

[The T]

The House has passed Lots of legislation against rules that don't exist.

So...let us cut to the chase...and abolish the EPA.

Simple.

Well, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Would you settle for simply cutting the EPA's budget by 50%?

Anything to make them less damaging. They are beholden to the POTUS. And they are used by THIS POTUS to circumvent the Congress.

Not exactly Constitutional.

 

[Bfgrn]

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

The House has passed Lots of legislation against rules that don't exist.

So...let us cut to the chase...and abolish the EPA.

Simple.

Yea, who needs clean air to breathe and safe water to drink when there is short term profits to be gained for the 1%?

When you understand what conservatism is, every argument they make leads to the same end.

Q: What is conservatism?
A: Conservatism is the domination of society by an aristocracy.

When you understand this and view their words, ask the question; will this lead to some form of an aristocracy?

The answer is always YES...


Liberalism is trust of the people, tempered by prudence; conservatism, distrust of people, tempered by fear.
William E. Gladstone

 

[editec]

Instead of Jobs Bill, House Explores Bill on NONEXISTENT EPA REGS

That's hilarious.

Well...it would be hilarious if it wasn't so typical of today's GOP.

 

[hboats]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

Actually that's not true either, but why stop the falsehoods now?

The House passed legislation to keep the EPA from being able to impose a proposed REGULATION on dust in rural areas.

You might want to actually know what you're talking about before you make yourself look any more foolish. Because on this subject you are sorely misinformed.

Rick

 

[Jarhead]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

Actually that's not true either, but why stop the falsehoods now?

The House passed legislation to keep the EPA from being able to impose a proposed REGULATION on dust in rural areas.

You might want to actually know what you're talking about before you make yourself look any more foolish. Because on this subject you are sorely misinformed.

Rick

alas...what is done is done...and it has been done a long time prior to THIS post.

 

[SFC Ollie]

New Flash, the title of this thread is a complete falsehood.

The EPA was indeed considering a proposed law to restrict dust in agricultural areas. And if you lived in an agricultural area you'd most likely have heard about it.

EPA to propose dust restrictions

Agriculture Law Proposed EPA Regulations Farm Dust - Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer - Seattle Corporate Lawyer - Business Attorney

Big surprise the EPA has removed any mention of this proposal from their website because of the backlash that they experienced after this proposal became public.

Rick

The thread title is accurate. You might want to try again. The House passed legislation against a RULE that doesn't exist.

Actually that's not true either, but why stop the falsehoods now?

The House passed legislation to keep the EPA from being able to impose a proposed REGULATION on dust in rural areas.

You might want to actually know what you're talking about before you make yourself look any more foolish. Because on this subject you are sorely misinformed.

Rick

This has been explained several times on this thread. You don't really expect any from the left to understand it, do you?