Inside the Ruthless, Restless Final Days of Trump’s Campaign

A loss? Gimme another dose of what you smoking.

Ruthless? Ummmm....been a successful businessman for 40 years....it comes with the turf.

The garbage truck stunt the other day was priceless and so was his speech afterwards. His wearing of the outfit to give the speech in was fantastic....and no narcissist can do what he did. That clowning, self depreciating style humor he used while trying to attain a very serious job demonstrates CONFIDENCE and wisdom and not hubris or narcissism.

Not being able to say anything coherently (word salads) and relying heavily upon listeners to fill in the blanks on your speeches? THAT IS NARCISSISM. It's the very classic form of it. And some of the reporters who have had Kamala on their stages have made faces in keeping with recognizing that reality. (The ones not speaking but still on camera)

And if trump loses ?
 
A very detailed and in-depth expose on the inner workings of the Trump campaign and the many missteps he's made that turned what looked to be a more than fair chance of winning to what is likely now a loss. He has no self-control and refuses to listen to his campaign staff. Textbook narcissism. What's really interesting is his alleged reasons for finally shrugging off Laura Loomer: "Trump, who is generally appalled by plastic surgery, was disgusted to learn about the apparent extent of Loomer’s facial alterations." The man has quite the decision-making process.

A long, tedious cut and paste opinion piece from a leftist tabloid.

Waste of bandwidth.
 
Hers are worst


1730598488663.png
 
A very detailed and in-depth expose on the inner workings of the Trump campaign and the many missteps he's made that turned what looked to be a more than fair chance of winning to what is likely now a loss. He has no self-control and refuses to listen to his campaign staff. Textbook narcissism. What's really interesting is his alleged reasons for finally shrugging off Laura Loomer: "Trump, who is generally appalled by plastic surgery, was disgusted to learn about the apparent extent of Loomer’s facial alterations." The man has quite the decision-making process.

And the Harris camp is just as ruthless. Nature of the beast.
 
Not true. The key to polling is to ask a sample that represents the demographics of the population being tested. So the percent of the population that are women is also the precent of the population in the sample. It has noting to do with anyone's expectations.
Actually percentage of the population means nothing.
If men are 48% of the population doesn't mean they should poll below women.
Say that 40% of males actually vote, but only 35% of women vote,. That means polling has to weigh heavier on the actual voters.
But this election in unique. Before 35% of women may have voted. But this election that might now be 45%.
If they poll based on expecting low female turnout, their poll will be wrong.
 
A very detailed and in-depth expose on the inner workings of the Trump campaign and the many missteps he's made that turned what looked to be a more than fair chance of winning to what is likely now a loss. He has no self-control and refuses to listen to his campaign staff. Textbook narcissism. What's really interesting is his alleged reasons for finally shrugging off Laura Loomer: "Trump, who is generally appalled by plastic surgery, was disgusted to learn about the apparent extent of Loomer’s facial alterations." The man has quite the decision-making process.


Excellent article
 
Actually percentage of the population means nothing.
If men are 48% of the population doesn't mean they should poll below women.
Say that 40% of males actually vote, but only 35% of women vote,. That means polling has to weigh heavier on the actual voters.
But this election in unique. Before 35% of women may have voted. But this election that might now be 45%.
If they poll based on expecting low female turnout, their poll will be wrong.
The purpose of the poll is to find out what percentages of various groups will vote and for whom. To do that the sample the pollsters use must have the same percent of each group the general population has, so if the group you are studying has 45% males and 52% females, then the sample group the pollsters are studying must have 45% males and 52% females. If 42% of the males in the sample say they will vote, then the expectation is that 42% of the males in the general population will vote, and similarly for females.

So if the demographics of the sample group are the same as the demographics of the general population, then the responses the people in the sample group give to the pollsters should tell us how the people in the general population will vote.
 
Actually percentage of the population means nothing.
If men are 48% of the population doesn't mean they should poll below women.
Say that 40% of males actually vote, but only 35% of women vote,. That means polling has to weigh heavier on the actual voters.
But this election in unique. Before 35% of women may have voted. But this election that might now be 45%.
If they poll based on expecting low female turnout, their poll will be wrong.
If the demographics of the sample the pollsters are polling are the same as the demographics of the general population, then the responses the people in the sample group give to the pollsters will tell us how people in the general population will vote within a margin of error. There are no other expectations at play here.
 
A good article, and if Trump loses, MAGA loses its bandwidth forever.
HUH? what constitutes the "bandwidth of Maga"? -----can I assume
you refer to its "public voice" ??? does "maga" have a public voice of
any level of influence?
 
A very detailed and in-depth expose on the inner workings of the Trump campaign and the many missteps he's made that turned what looked to be a more than fair chance of winning to what is likely now a loss. He has no self-control and refuses to listen to his campaign staff. Textbook narcissism. What's really interesting is his alleged reasons for finally shrugging off Laura Loomer: "Trump, who is generally appalled by plastic surgery, was disgusted to learn about the apparent extent of Loomer’s facial alterations." The man has quite the decision-making process.

Yeah...sure it is...
 
HUH? what constitutes the "bandwidth of Maga"? -----can I assume
you refer to its "public voice" ??? does "maga" have a public voice of
any level of influence?
You are example of your ilk who just don't get it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom