Ingraham: A first lady double standard?

[Ray From Cleveland]

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

 

[playtime]

Melanomia is what I call her, love how high school kids booed her little just-say-no to corporate state pharma opioids spleach.

Melanomas are generally thought to be incurable cancers. What a shame you marginalize such a sweet human being as First Lady Melania Trump who hurts no one. She defended the students who booed her, and she defends her son against mean people. She's a good mother and just as good a First Lady as the best of them.

lol.... her kid should be off limits - however, to subject him to a vile creature with no human emotion is putting her kid at risk. i've yet to see any warm father / son interaction between them.

#sad.

Actually you aren't paying attention to our nation's First Family.

President Trump has admitted that his children are all Tremendous, the kids are all pleased that they have an almost unbelievably fantastic father.

words aren't actions. the only warmth donny shows is towards ivanka & that's creepy as hell. & they love his tremendous cash.

President Trump's words in question were directed toward Howard Stern as part of a routine that he delivered to the Tremendous Shock Jock back in the day.

Those words are no more serious than the great Rodney Dangerfield's discussions about his daughter being elected "Most likely to conceive" in Public School or the attitude of his personal physician, Vincent Boombatz.

It was part of a comedy routine.

uh-huh, i listened to donny on stern many times back in the day... most of what he talked about has nothing to do with what i said. donny didn't care much for his kids when he was running around NYC with his whore marla, whilst still married to their mother - making sure they were on the cover of the enquirer every chance he got to humiliate ivana.

 

[playtime]

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

Michael Cohen is a convicted LIAR, sent to prison as a rat, who would say anything to spare his worthless ass.

yep, he's in prison. but lest ye ferget - michael cohen worked for donny for 10 years.

why is it that most of the people donny has hired wind up in jail?

 

[playtime]

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

zelinsky is trying to stop his people from being killed & his country from being taken over by putin.

duh, raymond. DUH.

 

[Polishprince]

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

zelinsky is trying to stop his people from being killed & his country from being taken over by putin.

duh, raymond. DUH.

So what's your point?

Are you saying that Zelensky is a lying Ukrainian piece of shit?

Should be an interesting cross examination if there is an impeachment trail as Zelensky may well be called.

 

[Dragonlady]

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

Look at you Ray. Using Russian propaganda talking points like a pro. What you posted is flat out lies and misstatements.

Actions speak louder than words Ray. Zelenskey is in no position to call Trump a liar when Trump sits next to him and says he didn't pressure Zelensky. We've seen how Trump treats those who don't go along with his lies. We have direct evidence from staffers that the Ukrainians were asking questions about their aid that indicated that they knew their aid was being held up.

Last but not least, Zelensky, scheduled an interview with CNN as directed, to announce investigations, and then cancelled the interview when the aid was released.

We had a LOT of direct witnesses: Sondland, Morrison, Yovanavich, Volker, Vindland.

Last but not least: IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD FOREIGN AID OF ANY KIND, ONCE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAS APPROVED THE AID. IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP TO WITHHOLD THE AID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

 

[playtime]

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

zelinsky is trying to stop his people from being killed & his country from being taken over by putin.

duh, raymond. DUH.

So what's your point?

Are you saying that Zelensky is a lying Ukrainian piece of shit?

Should be an interesting cross examination if there is an impeachment trail as Zelensky may well be called.

i'm saying that if my people were in danger, i would say what it takes to keep them alive. wouldn't you? or would you let them get slaughtered?

 

[Polishprince]

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

Look at you Ray. Using Russian propaganda talking points like a pro. What you posted is flat out lies and misstatements.

Actions speak louder than words Ray. Zelenskey is in no position to call Trump a liar when Trump sits next to him and says he didn't pressure Zelensky. We've seen how Trump treats those who don't go along with his lies. We have direct evidence from staffers that the Ukrainians were asking questions about their aid that indicated that they knew their aid was being held up.

Last but not least, Zelensky, scheduled an interview with CNN as directed, to announce investigations, and then cancelled the interview when the aid was released.

We had a LOT of direct witnesses: Sondland, Morrison, Yovanavich, Volker, Vindland.

Last but not least: IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD FOREIGN AID OF ANY KIND, ONCE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAS APPROVED THE AID. IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP TO WITHHOLD THE AID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

President Trump didn't withhold any aid.

You make President Zelensky sound like someone who is intimidated by President Trump. He doesn't look intimidated to me.

Once he's under oath, do you think Zelensky would lie for Trump when speaking before the nation?

 

[Mac-7]

Because they are not looking for anything to exonerate him. No matter what they find, they're going to carry out this farce regardless. It can't benefit Trump no matter what is or is not in the documents. All they are doing is looking for something.....anything to make their case for impeachment because the charges they have now are nothing but lies.

If Trump had evidence to exonerate himself, he would present it. Instead he refuses to participate or allow his staff to participate.

Like a true Mafia Don

You have it backwards

Democrats have to prove trump is guilty

And they have failed go do so

obstruction of congress is iron clad.

Trump has not obstructed congress

we'll find out won't we? ....... 9am. then it will up to the turtle & whether he's got any balls to bring president tinkles to trial.

We’ll find out what the American people think after all the facts are presented

 

[Mac-7]

Yeah, Vindmean, who is a renown Trump hater. So believe him instead of the transcript? Not to testify? It's likely he was the leaker.

Who cares who the leaker was?
They provided a very valuable service to the nation

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

^^^

Obviously low education voters on the right have more wisdom than low education voters on the left

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

Look at you Ray. Using Russian propaganda talking points like a pro. What you posted is flat out lies and misstatements.

Actions speak louder than words Ray. Zelenskey is in no position to call Trump a liar when Trump sits next to him and says he didn't pressure Zelensky. We've seen how Trump treats those who don't go along with his lies. We have direct evidence from staffers that the Ukrainians were asking questions about their aid that indicated that they knew their aid was being held up.

Last but not least, Zelensky, scheduled an interview with CNN as directed, to announce investigations, and then cancelled the interview when the aid was released.

We had a LOT of direct witnesses: Sondland, Morrison, Yovanavich, Volker, Vindland.

Last but not least: IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD FOREIGN AID OF ANY KIND, ONCE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAS APPROVED THE AID. IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP TO WITHHOLD THE AID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Shows you know nothing of what you're talking about. Didn't you watch the inquiries? If holding aid (that's always passed by Congress first) is illegal, then every President in the last 30 years is guilty. A President DOES have the right to withhold aid for whatever his reason may be. If it's illegal, then let's see Obama put on trial.

I never heard of this CNN thing. Care to provide a link? And what Ukrainians were asking questions about the aid when Zelensky didn't even know it was being held up?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

zelinsky is trying to stop his people from being killed & his country from being taken over by putin.

duh, raymond. DUH.

WTF does that have to do with what I said?

 

[Papageorgio]

Ingraham: A first lady double standard?
The only acceptable woman in the media landscape is a liberal one and if you are not, you're just too dumb to know the difference.

ME: Of course there is a double standard, on this matter as on all others too. If Melania were a democrat, speaking 5 languages and being a beautiful model, she would be on every magazine and ever tv show every day.

Speaking 5 languages?
Can you prove with a video where she speaks French, German or Italian....go. She also lied about her college degree.

According to CNN you are wrong, which doesn’t surprise me.

Melania Trump Fast Facts - CNN

Seems you are intimidated by strong women.

As First Lady, Melania travels the world and has had ample opportunity to demonstrate her mastery of languages. Yet, the only video of her speaking in French and Italian shows a rudimentary skill

Hello, my name is Melania, what is your name?
Then, back to English

So CNN is now fake news?

What that has to do with Melania the gold digger nude model lying about speaking French, German and Italian ?

I posted it the reason already, but knowing how difficult it is for you to connect the dots, here is the link again. Melania Trump Fast Facts - CNN

 

[rightwinger]

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

LOL

Sure Zelensky is going to provide cover for Trump. He needs US aid. Throwing the president under the bus would mean he has to wait until the next election.

 

[Polishprince]

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

LOL

Sure Zelensky is going to provide cover for Trump. He needs US aid. Throwing the president under the bus would mean he has to wait until the next election.

Actually, you have it half ass backwards, RW. If Zelensky tells the truth, the Libs will deny him aid when they take over in America. Payback will be a bitch.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

Look at you Ray. Using Russian propaganda talking points like a pro. What you posted is flat out lies and misstatements.

Actions speak louder than words Ray. Zelenskey is in no position to call Trump a liar when Trump sits next to him and says he didn't pressure Zelensky. We've seen how Trump treats those who don't go along with his lies. We have direct evidence from staffers that the Ukrainians were asking questions about their aid that indicated that they knew their aid was being held up.

Last but not least, Zelensky, scheduled an interview with CNN as directed, to announce investigations, and then cancelled the interview when the aid was released.

We had a LOT of direct witnesses: Sondland, Morrison, Yovanavich, Volker, Vindland.

Last but not least: IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD FOREIGN AID OF ANY KIND, ONCE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAS APPROVED THE AID. IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP TO WITHHOLD THE AID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

President Trump didn't withhold any aid.

You make President Zelensky sound like someone who is intimidated by President Trump. He doesn't look intimidated to me.

Once he's under oath, do you think Zelensky would lie for Trump when speaking before the nation?

Communists will never accept the fact that no aid was ever withheld.

 

[rightwinger]

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

Look at you Ray. Using Russian propaganda talking points like a pro. What you posted is flat out lies and misstatements.

Actions speak louder than words Ray. Zelenskey is in no position to call Trump a liar when Trump sits next to him and says he didn't pressure Zelensky. We've seen how Trump treats those who don't go along with his lies. We have direct evidence from staffers that the Ukrainians were asking questions about their aid that indicated that they knew their aid was being held up.

Last but not least, Zelensky, scheduled an interview with CNN as directed, to announce investigations, and then cancelled the interview when the aid was released.

We had a LOT of direct witnesses: Sondland, Morrison, Yovanavich, Volker, Vindland.

Last but not least: IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD FOREIGN AID OF ANY KIND, ONCE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAS APPROVED THE AID. IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP TO WITHHOLD THE AID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

President Trump didn't withhold any aid.

You make President Zelensky sound like someone who is intimidated by President Trump. He doesn't look intimidated to me.

Once he's under oath, do you think Zelensky would lie for Trump when speaking before the nation?

Communists will never accept the fact that no aid was ever withheld.

Actually, the aid was withheld

It was released once the whistleblower complaint became known

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

LOL

Sure Zelensky is going to provide cover for Trump. He needs US aid. Throwing the president under the bus would mean he has to wait until the next election.

No, I think even Zelensky knew that he could pressure Trump into releasing the money. That's besides the fact it was only held for a few weeks. The arm of the Democrat party--the MSM would have seen to that.

The President has to have a legitimate reason for holding on to the aid. Trump was checking things out and monitoring other UN countries to see what they were going to do.

 

[Taz]

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

LOL

Sure Zelensky is going to provide cover for Trump. He needs US aid. Throwing the president under the bus would mean he has to wait until the next election.

No, I think even Zelensky knew that he could pressure Trump into releasing the money. That's besides the fact it was only held for a few weeks. The arm of the Democrat party--the MSM would have seen to that.

The President has to have a legitimate reason for holding on to the aid. Trump was checking things out and monitoring other UN countries to see what they were going to do.

In other words, you have nothing. Now you know.

 

[Polishprince]

his long time lawyer 'splained it perfectly. donny doesn't explicitly say what he wants - but when he does want something, he'll make it clear to you.

And Zelensky knew Trump as well as he did? Zelensky said he felt absolutely no pressure from Trump, but you're going to take his imprisoned lawyers word for it instead. Shokin stated he was indeed on the tail of Burisma, but you're going to take the Democrats word for it that he wasn't.

Seems to me you on the left don't like direct witnesses, You like "he said" "she said" information and base your claims on that. Second hand, third hand, fourth hand information is just fine with you, but direct information is to be ignored and even called unreliable.

Look at you Ray. Using Russian propaganda talking points like a pro. What you posted is flat out lies and misstatements.

Actions speak louder than words Ray. Zelenskey is in no position to call Trump a liar when Trump sits next to him and says he didn't pressure Zelensky. We've seen how Trump treats those who don't go along with his lies. We have direct evidence from staffers that the Ukrainians were asking questions about their aid that indicated that they knew their aid was being held up.

Last but not least, Zelensky, scheduled an interview with CNN as directed, to announce investigations, and then cancelled the interview when the aid was released.

We had a LOT of direct witnesses: Sondland, Morrison, Yovanavich, Volker, Vindland.

Last but not least: IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD FOREIGN AID OF ANY KIND, ONCE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAS APPROVED THE AID. IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP TO WITHHOLD THE AID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

President Trump didn't withhold any aid.

You make President Zelensky sound like someone who is intimidated by President Trump. He doesn't look intimidated to me.

Once he's under oath, do you think Zelensky would lie for Trump when speaking before the nation?

Communists will never accept the fact that no aid was ever withheld.

Actually, the aid was withheld

It was released once the whistleblower complaint became known

Zelensky didn't know the aid was delayed, so it wasn't any pressure or coercion.