Interesting, this is exactly why InfoWars was created in the first place. There is an Information War on, for your mind. I try to tell folks, no Communist/Democrat will ever stand for the Constitution. In fact, they despise it. This is just one more example of that. Don't like what they're saying? Have them banned. Hopefully this won't be allowed to stand. Gotta keep on fighting the bastards.
Big tech’s coordinated purge of InfoWars — which was hit by bans from Apple, Facebook, Spotify and YouTube in rapid succession — did not occur in a vacuum. On this issue, Silicon Valley bowed to CNN journalists and Democrat politicians who ceaselessly lobbied for the site to be censored.
It’s a sign of how the concentration of power in America has shifted from big government to big tech that politicians are now lobbying tech companies rather than the other way round, but that’s exactly what happened over the course of the past few months, as Democrats applied relentless pressure on Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants to censor InfoWars.
Chief among them was Democratic Congressman Ted Deutch (D-FL), who demanded that a Facebook representative “explain” their decision not to ban InfoWars at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on social media censorship last month. Calling Jones as “well-known conspiracy theorist” whose “brand is bullying,” Deutch also demanded Google’s representative explain how many strikes it would take for a channel on Google-owned YouTube to be deleted...
Read More:
InfoWars Ban - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
Free market.
/end thread
is it free if you can ban people who say things you don't like?
/dumbass
Yes.
Companies are free to choose how they run their business -- what kind of content they allow on their platform.
Freedom to choose.
Consumers are free to spend their money on the products and services they choose--which internet platform they click on.
Less clicks will mean less money for these companies. They made a choice to take loss to clean up their brand.
Freedom.
Don't you love FREEDOM?
Forcing them to carry Alex Jones would be Government Regulations and Rules intruding on the Free Market. Get it?
It's all about Choice. Don't you love Choice?
I call your attention to Civics 101 - the first amendment protects you from GOVERNMENT censorship/bans (not a private businesses freely choosing their own brand and associations)
There is no first amendment issue here as Alex Cox has not been hindered by any Government authority/regulation.
They are attempting to link the decision to Democratic Reps -- very thin. Very weak. Pathetic. A few comments at a hearing. BFD.
If Alex Jones is banned, then why can I go on his site right now?
Fail.