
Hardly. I've never implied any such thing and I use zero of those toys myself, having considered them an abject waste of time from the beginning. But since you draw the comparison, television as propaganda tool should certainly receive the same criticism, shouldn't it?
But ultimately that's up to the viewer, the Nosebooker, the Twit, to winnow his/her info from the chaff. I don't hold an opinion on whether Alex John Brinkley Jones should be on YouTube or not. It's not my site. That's up to YouTube, simple as that. Or Fecesbook or television, whatever the medium.
I've been pointing out all day that this butthurt whining is not about Jones'
content at all, but rather about controlling how many people might see it. Their diapers are chafed because without YouTube (apparently) nobody will know the wondrous insight of a grown man who sells grunting noises and primal screams so he can set up his John Brinkley routine (which doesn't say a lot for the strength of Brinkl... uh, Jones' argument, does it). So ultimately it's not about Alex Jones' voice; it's about their control freak designs on somebody else's platform; dictating how they (YouTube et al) may be allowed to use
their own site.
It's the flip side of the coin of the Sean Spicer kerfuffle last week, where Spicer threatened to sue the Associated Press for passing on --- not originating but
passing on -- an existing story of an incident where Spicey got accused. In that case Spicey wanted to control how much of the public would NOT get to read the story; in this case Jones' sycophants want to control how much of the public DOES. And in each case the info is already readily available for anyone who seeks it.
If some clown joined this site and started posting paeans to necrophilia, the site could and probably would ban him, and it would be within its rights to do so. Just because they provide a platform for discussion doesn't mean they have to tolerate literally anything on it; it's their site. Same thing with YouTube.
WAY too long; didn't read, sorry. Even I don't get that longwinded....
But as far as 'they're coming for (whoever)" --- how come the same wags are on the exact opposite side with the NFL kneelers? Irony, that....