Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know?Weak sauce. Smith can never prove what Trump was thinking. This is why Smith has a bad reputation. Disinformation is not a crime, it's part of the 1st amendment.
Misfit cheerleaders flailing your Pom Poms is something of an alternate reality.Notice not many trump supporters in here. Avoiding reality per usual.
You reckon that will be a good legal defense?Trump Attorney John Lauro say free speech is now criminalized. He points out the obvious that this indictment comes after the revelations about Biden and his son. The 1st amendment is now under assault.
I'm reminded of...
- JUST IN: The federal grand jury hearing evidence in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into efforts by former President Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election handed up an indictment Tuesday in the courthouse in Washington, DC.
- A judge agreed to seal the indictment, and there was no information given in court about the number of defendants or the identity of any defendant. The judge also approved a summons for the unidentified defendant or defendants to appear in court.
Jan. 6 grand jury hands up indictment
I apologize if this has already been posted. I did a search but didn't find anything previously posted.
And the ones who are here are deflecting, spinning, and lying – per usual.Notice not many trump supporters in here. Avoiding reality per usual.
Oh, well shit, if Mark Levin said so, it must be true.Mark Levin read the 45 pages and said they read like a white paper from the DNC.
Why do you think he won't?Do you want to bet on that?
And yet, the unindicted co-conspirators told Trump over and over again, that he lost.Evidence of what? That he THOUGHT the election was fixed?
Jack Smith just made a statement. No substance and the criminalizati on of disinformation. This is not motivated by new evidence. Trump will appeal no doubt. Smith talked about Jan 6 but there is nothing in his indictment about this. Smith is now an officigal demagogue.
They are losing their minds. They never thought it would get to this point. Now they are mentally having to deal with the real possibility trump could be convicted.And the ones who are here are deflecting, spinning, and lying – per usual.
Evidence of what? That he THOUGHT the election was fixed?
He'll be begging the idiot herd for cash by nightfall.In the history books, Trump will be a giant greasy black mark.
Honestly Leo, you can't be that ignorant as to how they connect....?Jack Smith just made a statement. No substance and the criminalization of disinformation. This is not motivated by new evidence. Trump will appeal no doubt. Smith talked about Jan 6 but there is nothing in his indictment about that. Smith is now an official demagogue.
It is what they do.
A Manhattan(!) jury acquitted Trump of the rape allegation, but the [civil] trial,l judge when denying Trump a retrial, said there was sufficient evidence to say Trump raped her (the lying hag). He had no right to say such in light of the jury verdict and should be smacked down by the Appellate Division.