Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,164
- 1,830
More political theater.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My question: why didn't they deal with the bad parts before they passed it in the first place?
Talking about this in the abstract is pointless. Plenty of pieces that some thought were "bad" (e.g. a public option, Ben Nelson's permanently enhanced FMAP for Nebraska, a perceived lack of additional resources for anti-fraud efforts) were dealt with during the legislative process. So if you want to talk about the particular reasons why something is still in the law, you'll have to be specific.
I think the biggest, most glaring pile of shit still in it is the mandate (though there are LOTS of piles in it). But the mandate is walking the green mile, now that the Bill has passed the House and 26 States have enjoined the lawsuit to remove it.
Constitutional or not (to me, it is obviously NOT Constitutional, but that has now become moot), if the majority of States don't want it, it will not be enacted or enforced. And 26 (and still growing) is a pretty large majority of the States.
The mandate is dead. All that remains is the formality of the autopsy and the burial.
Constitutional or not (to me, it is obviously NOT Constitutional, but that has now become moot), if the majority of States don't want it, it will not be enacted or enforced. And 26 (and still growing) is a pretty large majority of the States.
Constitutional or not (to me, it is obviously NOT Constitutional, but that has now become moot), if the majority of States don't want it, it will not be enacted or enforced. And 26 (and still growing) is a pretty large majority of the States.
Virtually every state is designing and exchange. If they don't want a mandate in their market, they're going to have to come up with something to replace it that serves the same function.
Constitutional or not (to me, it is obviously NOT Constitutional, but that has now become moot), if the majority of States don't want it, it will not be enacted or enforced. And 26 (and still growing) is a pretty large majority of the States.
Virtually every state is designing and exchange. If they don't want a mandate in their market, they're going to have to come up with something to replace it that serves the same function.
Constitutional or not (to me, it is obviously NOT Constitutional, but that has now become moot), if the majority of States don't want it, it will not be enacted or enforced. And 26 (and still growing) is a pretty large majority of the States.
Virtually every state is designing and exchange. If they don't want a mandate in their market, they're going to have to come up with something to replace it that serves the same function.
When you want something it is imperative, something that nobody can live without? How did we survive so long without this mandate? Who are you to decree what is and what is not possible?
obama will not be funded so the attempt is moot.
When you want something it is imperative, something that nobody can live without? How did we survive so long without this mandate? Who are you to decree what is and what is not possible?
We survived this long through medical underwriting: exclusions or discriminatory rates levied on people for their gender, or age, or medical history. Most people don't particularly that concept. So now it won't exist anymore. But underwriting existed because it served a purpose; eliminating it requires instituting something else that serves the same purpose.
obama will not be funded so the attempt is moot.
All you're suggesting is that states won't receive any more federal grants to help them do things like design exchanges, etc. We'll see if that's the case but even if it is, states are still required (and have already started) to implement the big ticket items in the law, namely the Medicaid expansion and the construction of exchanges.
This mess of a bill needs to be repealed.
They need to start over. Keep what good and go for real reform i.e. the cost.
This mess of a bill needs to be repealed.
They need to start over. Keep what good and go for real reform i.e. the cost.
You would trust the government will any type of healthcare legislation as law? no matter how stripped they will make it sooner or later someone will bring back what we have now. Remeber the patriot act? How it was supposed to protect the American people, now it's used against us. No way this monster has got to go before it grows out of control.
This mess of a bill needs to be repealed.
They need to start over. Keep what good and go for real reform i.e. the cost.
You would trust the government will any type of healthcare legislation as law? no matter how stripped they will make it sooner or later someone will bring back what we have now. Remeber the patriot act? How it was supposed to protect the American people, now it's used against us. No way this monster has got to go before it grows out of control.
I completely trust the government over private entities..which..as it is shown in Arizona, without funding..will let people die.
"Obamacare" is the Republican plan. What should have happened was a public option or expanded medicare.
I was talking to someone at work the other day who had no clue that they could now put their kid back on their healthcare plan until he's 26, because of this bill. It's clear that many people aren't supporting this thing because they don't even know of its benefits to them.
“A bill without the mandate is no longer real health reform,” said Jonathan Gruber, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a key architect of both the Massachusetts law and the federal law.Somebody will have to. The bill passed today would not be signed by a Republican in the White House. The vote today means the GOP has committed itself to health care reform. This is a very good step.
In a paper prepared for the Obama administration, Gruber estimated premiums would rise 27 percent without the mandate because of these “free riders,” as opposed to the 10 percent expected increase in the non-group market expected under reform."
So without the mandate premiums would rise 27%. There would be several options besides just repealing it.
1. Pass legislation to discourage the free riders, (those that wait till they are seriously ill to sign up). Insurance companies could be allowed to consider preexisting conditions for free riders.
2. Pass legislation to adopt a single payer system. That would probably be the cheapest alternative but it would be a huge fight since it would be the end of private healthcare insurance.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/congr...de-house-repeals-obamacare-3.html#post3227865
well, you weren't the one I expected to try and explain it but I do thank you.
how about bending the cost curve?
You would trust the government will any type of healthcare legislation as law? no matter how stripped they will make it sooner or later someone will bring back what we have now. Remeber the patriot act? How it was supposed to protect the American people, now it's used against us. No way this monster has got to go before it grows out of control.
I completely trust the government over private entities..which..as it is shown in Arizona, without funding..will let people die.
"Obamacare" is the Republican plan. What should have happened was a public option or expanded medicare.
Than you really are a fol sorry about that but you are a very foolish person to think the government wants to help you. Have they helped the American Indian? Look at what kind of healthcare system the government provides for them.
I completely trust the government over private entities..which..as it is shown in Arizona, without funding..will let people die.
"Obamacare" is the Republican plan. What should have happened was a public option or expanded medicare.
Than you really are a fol sorry about that but you are a very foolish person to think the government wants to help you. Have they helped the American Indian? Look at what kind of healthcare system the government provides for them.
Ya..right..like you do. What a vile ignorant piece of shit you are. It is morons like you that help sell ignorance to your fellow countrymen that has already destroyed our country. Thanks asshole.
Than you really are a fol sorry about that but you are a very foolish person to think the government wants to help you. Have they helped the American Indian? Look at what kind of healthcare system the government provides for them.
Ya..right..like you do. What a vile ignorant piece of shit you are. It is morons like you that help sell ignorance to your fellow countrymen that has already destroyed our country. Thanks asshole.
HUGGY sucks dick in the "homo cage"....
True story...![]()