The founder of the democrat party hated republicanism for many reasons.
I'll start off, he hated separation of powers, and did not respect the separated powers principle.
Do you even know what you are talking about?
Popular democracy versus reptesentative democracy.
Andrew Jackson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jackson was nicknamed "Old Hickory" because of his toughness and aggressive personality; he fought in duels, some fatal to his opponents.[2] He was a wealthy slaveholder. He fought politically against what he denounced as a closed, undemocratic aristocracy, adding to his appeal to common citizens. He expanded the spoils system during his presidency to strengthen his political base.
Elected president in 1828, Jackson supported a small and limited federal government. He strengthened the power of the presidency, which he saw as spokesman for the entire population, as opposed to Congressmen from a specific small district. He was supportive of states' rights, but during the Nullification Crisis, declared that states do not have the right to nullify federal laws. Strongly against the national bank, he vetoed the renewal of its charter and ensured its collapse. Whigs and moralists denounced his aggressive enforcement of the Indian Removal Act, which resulted in the forced relocation of thousands of Native Americans to Indian Territory (now Oklahoma). Historians acknowledge his protection of popular democracy and individual liberty for United States citizens, but criticize his support for slavery and his role in Indian removal.[3][4]
The OP was incoherent. Jackson is, imo, the most interesting of the post-Madison pre-Lincoln potuses. The contradictions in him are monumental, and his economic record uneven, and his brutality not exagerated, but .... he was unyeilding in being the voice of the common white American seeking to better himself via his own efforts (and his slaves). He did adopt a native american, whom his troops orphaned, and I don't recall there were any notions he was especially barbaric towards his slaves ... beyond owning them, which is pretty horrific, but accepted at the time.