In red states, it’s open season on women’s rights

“American companies should seriously consider how and if they want to do business in states that treat their employees and their employees’ families as second-class citizens.
[…]
In red states, it’s open season on women’s rights.
[…]
Some companies are taking small steps to ease the burden on their employees living in states with these misogynist, reactionary laws. Yelp, for example, only has about 200 employees working in Texas, but will pay for them or their spouses to travel out of state for abortion care. Late last year, the company Salesforce announced that it will do the same. And Citigroup, which has some 8,000 workers in Texas, also said it will pay for them to leave to obtain abortions.”


Very good.

Let’s hope more private employers do the same for their employees living in repressive, authoritarian states.
Sure, cease all business with Red states.

In a week when you run out of food, fiber, and fuel don't come back whining.
 
Smaller less intrusive govt. my ass...This is total control of the population and their bodies a tyranny of revoking the liberties granted.
A woman may have a supposed right to abortion but she has no right for anyone else to provide it to her.

None of our rights are dependent on being provided anything from others.
 
A woman may have a supposed right to abortion but she has no right for anyone else to provide it to her.

None of our rights are dependent on being provided anything from others.

the hyde amendment, which has been around since the 70's ensures that federal dollars are not provided for abortion.
 
the hyde amendment, which has been around since the 70's ensures that federal dollars are not provided for abortion.
Irrelevant to this discussion.

That a woman has a supposed right to an abortion does not mean anyone is obligated to provide it to her.

Our rights are not dependent on the actions of others.
 
Irrelevant to this discussion.

That a woman has a supposed right to an abortion does not mean anyone is obligated to provide it to her.

Our rights are not dependent on the actions of others.

i thought you said provide it FOR her.... no one is obligated to provide it to her; what is irrelevant is you think anyone suggested that.

& there is no 'supposed' about it. do you have autonomy over yer body?

should you always when it comes to medical decisions?
 
i thought you said provide it FOR her.... no one is obligated to provide it to her; what is irrelevant is you think anyone suggested that.

& there is no 'supposed' about it. do you have autonomy over yer body?

should you always when it comes to medical decisions?
"Healthcare Provider", "Abortion Provider"...

If a woman wants an abortion and it's not available lately she's free to travel to where it is available.
 
"Healthcare Provider", "Abortion Provider"...

If a woman wants an abortion and it's not available lately she's free to travel to where it is available.

lol ... tell that to the bastards in missouri who want to pass laws to stop women from traveling. or yer own state of texas who have put bounties on women heads even if they do leave.
 

Missouri bill would allow lawsuits against those who help women obtain abortions out of state

BY JONATHAN SHORMAN UPDATED MARCH 08, 2022 8:37 PM

Rep. Mary Elizabeth Coleman. The Arnold Republican introduced an anti-abortion bill modeled after a Texas law the U.S. Supreme Court allowed to go into effect. A Missouri lawmaker wants to stop residents from obtaining abortions outside the state by allowing lawsuits to be filed against anyone who helps them. Rep. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican, has proposed a measure that would make performing an abortion on a Missouri resident — or helping a Missouri resident get one — illegal. Like a similar law in Texas, the prohibitions could only be enforced through lawsuits filed by citizens. State government would have no enforcement authority. The U.S. Supreme Court has, for now, allowed the Texas law to remain in effect while courts consider challenges to it. But Coleman’s measure goes further by asserting authority over what happens outside of Missouri.

Read more at: https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article259208848.html#storylink=cpy

Texas woman charged with murder after abortion

By Yeganeh Torbati
and
Caroline Kitchener
April 9, 2022|Updated April 9, 2022 at 7:18 p.m. EDT

A 26-year-old woman in Texas was arrested and charged with murder after what authorities claimed was a “self-induced abortion,” the Associated Press reported Saturday.
Lizelle Herrera was arrested Thursday and taken to the Starr County jail in Rio Grande City, along the Rio Grande and the country’s southern border with Mexico.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/09/abortion-texas-murder-charge/

why was it self induced?

The Texas Abortion Law Creates a Kind of Bounty Hunter. Here’s How It Works.

There is little precedent for the provision that deputizes ordinary citizens to enforce an effective ban on abortions — and offers them a financial incentive to do so.

The law establishes a kind of bounty system. If these vigilante plaintiffs are successful, the law allows them to collect cash judgments of $10,000 — and their legal fees — from those they sue. If they lose, they do not have to pay the defendants’ legal costs.

The Supreme Court declined to stop the legislation from taking effect, and so far, no one has brought a suit against an abortion provider because clinics in the state have chosen to abide by the law, which effectively bars abortions starting around the sixth week of pregnancy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/10/us/politics/texas-abortion-law-facts.html

^^^ that's why ^^^

here's a little FYI ... i always back up what i say.
 

Forum List

Back
Top