In his own words.

[d0gbreath]

(A). The problem of major "news" networks acting as influencers rather than reporters of events (with a legitimate right to assert opinions, when clearly labeled as such) is one that deserves attention. The First Amendment, despite Leftist bizarre claims, does NOT give an unrestricted right to say or publish anything you want.

(B). It is positively bizarre when Leftists screech about Trump's "threats" to use expansive Presidential power, when they have expanded Congressional powers beyond not only the words of Article I, but beyond any rational extension thereof.

(C). The decade-long slander campaign against Trump is so engrained in the Media culture that it goes unnoticed by most of the news-consuming public.

No, it is not slander if it is true:

Truth is a complete defense
In the United States, truth is a complete defense to defamation claims, including slander and libel. This means that if you are accused of defamation, slander, or libel, and you can prove that what you said was true, there is no case.

 

[FA_Q2]

From the party claiming to be for free speech.

I always thought 1984's doublethink was a satire rather than hard fact but here we are, people directly engaging in doublethink.

 

[kyzr]

Because who needs constitutional rights?

whose constitutional rights?

Mine from propaganda 24/7?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

whose constitutional rights?

Mine from propaganda 24/7?

That's a good point. It's only fair that there be some way to silence people who say things we don't like.

 

[kyzr]

Was trying to steal the last election within his legal limits? Was stonewalling subpoenas? Was appropriating funds under an emergency declaration? Was extorting a foreign leader?

You can type all the lies you want.

Nancy Pelosi took responsibility for J6
Everyone stonewalls subpoenas
If you are referring to the wall funding, best money ever spent
Extorting a foreign leader? You mean this

 

[kyzr]

I think the free press is important.They can report whatever they want, but some kind of a bias rating should be assigned AND POSTED as part of the program or story.

...or both parties should be allowed a short rebuttal to fact check the "bias" in the national "news" programs.

Opinion programs should also have short rebuttals

 

[kyzr]

That's a good point. It's only fair that there be some way to silence people who say things we don't like.

They can tell the truth all they want, its the lies reported as news that needs to be stopped.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

They can tell the truth all they want, its the lies reported as news that needs to be stopped.

But I like Fox.

 

[Papageorgio]

Feared? trump was in Putin's back pocket.

That’s why under Trump Russia stayed with in its borders and under Obama and Biden they invaded other countries, seems like you are wrong.

 

[Papageorgio]

maybe we could have a "doctrine" mandating "fairness?"maybe something similar to the ":fairness doctrine" destroyed by reagan so his fox enablers could lie for him?

Define fairness.

 

[Beekeeper]

Better than the likes of EU leaders, much less that cuck to the north of us or the corrupt pieces of shit to our south.

EU "leaders" lead sheep.

 

[berg80]

Trump says he’d ‘fire’ special counsel Jack Smith in ‘two seconds’ if elected again

Former president Donald Trump said Thursday that he would “fire” special counsel Jack Smith on his first day back in the White House if he is elected again, making clear that he would push to drop a pair of federal cases against him.

In an interview Thursday morning with conservative podcast host Hugh Hewitt, Trump was asked what he would do if he had to choose between firing Smith or pardoning himself at the start of a second term.

“Oh, it’s so easy. It’s so easy. … I would fire him within two seconds,” Trump said of Smith, who is leading the Justice Department’s investigations into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and the hoarding of classified documents.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/10/24/trump-fire-jack-smith/

It's what any two-bit dictator would do.

 

[berg80]

Extorting a foreign leader?

Yup.

Trump’s Extortion of Ukraine: A Complete Government Shakedown​

Trump’s Extortion of Ukraine: A Complete Government Shakedown

While President Trump is at the center of the Ukraine controversy, the alleged extortion scheme likely implicates a host of top administration officials and advisers.

www.americanprogress.org

 

[kyzr]

Yup.

Trump’s Extortion of Ukraine: A Complete Government Shakedown​

There was no Trump extortion, he asked for an investigation into obvious criminality by the Bidens, a legitimate ask. If it was "extortion" where are the indictments?????

extortion: Illegal use of one's official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage.

This is what real extortio0n looks like, the Bidens protecting their Burisma cash cow:

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We survived a Trump presidency. Its not as bad as you say. People in the Trump WH know what their legal limits are.

But will those people be there for the 2nd term?

 

[whitehall]

Let it go lefties. You are looking like petulant fools analyzing every word spoken by Trump when the democrat candidate can't seem to answer simple questions or explain a logical agenda.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Let it go lefties. You are looking like petulant fools analyzing every word spoken by Trump when the democrat candidate can't seem to answer simple questions or explain a logical agenda.

You know this isn't about Donald's "words," right?

 

[kyzr]

But will those people be there for the 2nd term?

Trump would have a lot of very qualified people to pick from.
This link shows a few. My favorite is Elon Musk to reconfigure the Federal government and save $trillions.

Who could be in Trump’s next Cabinet? Here are leading contenders.

www.politico.com

 

[Billiejeens]

But will those people be there for the 2nd term?

They sure weren't there the last 4 years.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Trump would have a lot of very qualified people to pick from.
This link shows a few. My favorite is Elon Musk to reconfigure the Federal government and save $trillions.

Who could be in Trump’s next Cabinet? Here are leading contenders.

www.politico.com

The questions stands, would any of those people know what their legal limits are and be willing to tell Trump he was going over them.

We know Musk would not