In Fort Benning, US Army Shuts Down Misogynist Trolls

In other words, they tweaked the training.

They didn't tweak shit .

Congrats to those ladies.

You were not there.

Shut up.

LOL I'm sorry my life hurts your feelings.

Hurts my feelings ?

Don't flatter your sorry self.

You were not there. Making such claims is stupid.

If things were changed for them, we'll know soon enough.

Me, I don't mess with anyone who's been trained to fight with a knife.
 
Yup and the two they replaces will have to wait for the next go round.

Thise rwo will also have a better chabce if ever serving in the 75th Ranger battalion than these two will.

This does help me in one regard.... I will have a much easier time shooting soldiers in an army with women when we Conservatives finally revolt again than against a real (all-male) military.
lol. you're hilarious.
 
All far right and far left and libertarian trolls should follow Correll's excellent counsel: Calling people who do not agree with you names and implying that their disagreement with you is based on a personal failing on their part reveals nothing but the inability of the accuser of understanding that reasonable people can reasonable disagree with them.
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?
Meh, whether it is or not..it's true.
 
One, trolls be a trolling; it's what they do.

Women see combat all the time. They are just not in the combat arms in the Army or the Marines.

They will be great officers.


Calling people names just because they disagree with you, instead of addressing their concerns, is the act of a troll.

Having a belief that woman cannot do the ranger training is not being a misogynist or a troll.

Don't argue with him.

Put him on ignore.

His low I.Q. won't rub off on you.
 
In other words, they tweaked the training.

They didn't tweak shit .

Congrats to those ladies.

You were not there.

Shut up.

LOL I'm sorry my life hurts your feelings.

Hurts my feelings ?

Don't flatter your sorry self.

You were not there. Making such claims is stupid.

If things were changed for them, we'll know soon enough.

Me, I don't mess with anyone who's been trained to fight with a knife.

Prove I wasn't then, at a minimum though cease your flaming with no other purpose.
 
All far right and far left and libertarian trolls should follow Correll's excellent counsel: Calling people who do not agree with you names and implying that their disagreement with you is based on a personal failing on their part reveals nothing but the inability of the accuser of understanding that reasonable people can reasonable disagree with them.
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?
Meh, whether it is or not..it's true.
except the two graduates are proof that it isn't.
no wonder you have such a hard time here, you don't understand the difference between true and false.
 
All far right and far left and libertarian trolls should follow Correll's excellent counsel: Calling people who do not agree with you names and implying that their disagreement with you is based on a personal failing on their part reveals nothing but the inability of the accuser of understanding that reasonable people can reasonable disagree with them.
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?

NOpe. Women are generally smaller and weaker than men, and have lower upper capabilities.

I was always under the impression that those lower maximum capabilities were not high enough to pass Ranger Training.

That is not a prejudice.
 
One, trolls be a trolling; it's what they do.

Women see combat all the time. They are just not in the combat arms in the Army or the Marines.

They will be great officers.


Calling people names just because they disagree with you, instead of addressing their concerns, is the act of a troll.

Having a belief that woman cannot do the ranger training is not being a misogynist or a troll.

Don't argue with him.

Put him on ignore.

His low I.Q. won't rub off on you.
Sundebl tried what you did, Correll, and got the unholy knocked out of him. He is happier on Ignore. You might be too if you can't take what you dish.
 
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?
Meh, whether it is or not..it's true.
except the two graduates are proof that it isn't.
no wonder you have such a hard time here, you don't understand the difference between true and false.

You believe everything the military tells you?
 
All far right and far left and libertarian trolls should follow Correll's excellent counsel: Calling people who do not agree with you names and implying that their disagreement with you is based on a personal failing on their part reveals nothing but the inability of the accuser of understanding that reasonable people can reasonable disagree with them.
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?

NOpe. Women are generally smaller and weaker than men, and have lower upper capabilities.

I was always under the impression that those lower maximum capabilities were not high enough to pass Ranger Training.

That is not a prejudice.
Good comment. I have seen some women in action who would clean your clock, some who might clean mine. They have passed the course. Good for them.
 
All far right and far left and libertarian trolls should follow Correll's excellent counsel: Calling people who do not agree with you names and implying that their disagreement with you is based on a personal failing on their part reveals nothing but the inability of the accuser of understanding that reasonable people can reasonable disagree with them.
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?

NOpe. Women are generally smaller and weaker than men, and have lower upper capabilities.

I was always under the impression that those lower maximum capabilities were not high enough to pass Ranger Training.

That is not a prejudice.
i can see your point, but i would think that a blanket thought that all women were incapable would be misogynistic.
 
One, trolls be a trolling; it's what they do.

Women see combat all the time. They are just not in the combat arms in the Army or the Marines.

They will be great officers.


Calling people names just because they disagree with you, instead of addressing their concerns, is the act of a troll.

Having a belief that woman cannot do the ranger training is not being a misogynist or a troll.

Don't argue with him.

Put him on ignore.

His low I.Q. won't rub off on you.
Sundebl tried what you did, Correll, and got the unholy knocked out of him. He is happier on Ignore. You might be too if you can't take what you dish.

I'm not sure what you mean.

I always try to treat people with the same level of respect they show me.

IF that means always saying Thank You and Your welcome, that's fine.

IF that means a screaming match were the goal seems to be inventing new swear words to call one another, that is less fun for me, but I do not believe in taking the high road.

Or anything in between.

You get to set the level.
 
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?
Meh, whether it is or not..it's true.
except the two graduates are proof that it isn't.
no wonder you have such a hard time here, you don't understand the difference between true and false.

You believe everything the military tells you?
is there reason to believe they aren't telling the truth? that the men that went through the school with them are all lying?
 
One, trolls be a trolling; it's what they do.

Women see combat all the time. They are just not in the combat arms in the Army or the Marines.

They will be great officers.


Calling people names just because they disagree with you, instead of addressing their concerns, is the act of a troll.

Having a belief that woman cannot do the ranger training is not being a misogynist or a troll.

Don't argue with him.

Put him on ignore.

His low I.Q. won't rub off on you.
Sundebl tried what you did, Correll, and got the unholy knocked out of him. He is happier on Ignore. You might be too if you can't take what you dish.

I knew you'd post one of your "hide under your mother skirt and yell come and get me" posts.

You are pathetic.

You couldn't knock the unholy out of my deceased grandmother.
 
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?
Meh, whether it is or not..it's true.
except the two graduates are proof that it isn't.
no wonder you have such a hard time here, you don't understand the difference between true and false.
No, they really aren't. They can also be proof that the requirements were jazzed.
 
One, trolls be a trolling; it's what they do.

Women see combat all the time. They are just not in the combat arms in the Army or the Marines.

They will be great officers.


Calling people names just because they disagree with you, instead of addressing their concerns, is the act of a troll.

Having a belief that woman cannot do the ranger training is not being a misogynist or a troll.

Don't argue with him.

Put him on ignore.

His low I.Q. won't rub off on you.
Sundebl tried what you did, Correll, and got the unholy knocked out of him. He is happier on Ignore. You might be too if you can't take what you dish.

I'm not sure what you mean.

I always try to treat people with the same level of respect they show me.

IF that means always saying Thank You and Your welcome, that's fine.

IF that means a screaming match were the goal seems to be inventing new swear words to call one another, that is less fun for me, but I do not believe in taking the high road.

Or anything in between.

You get to set the level.

Jake yells troll at anyone who dares to show him that his High School diploma is a fraud.

You are wasting your time.
 
15th post
No one is calling anyone names in this thread except for you.
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?

NOpe. Women are generally smaller and weaker than men, and have lower upper capabilities.

I was always under the impression that those lower maximum capabilities were not high enough to pass Ranger Training.

That is not a prejudice.
Good comment. I have seen some women in action who would clean your clock, some who might clean mine. They have passed the course. Good for them.

So the initial reports claim.

Perhaps it's true.

TO many people invested in the lib agenda for me to assume that none of them might have interfered with the normal training.
 
Not really, not like you just did to me in another thread. We went through this when you came on the Board, and tried doing it and then crying when it was done to you.

Don't dish what you can't take, podjo.

Don't call names when you get mad.

To the OP: their peers and those who served with them give them high kudos. Those that don't were not there and don't count.


You are calling people who disagree with you "misogynist trolls".

There is nothing misogynistic about thinking the women can't do Ranger Training.
there isn't? that's not a prejudice?

NOpe. Women are generally smaller and weaker than men, and have lower upper capabilities.

I was always under the impression that those lower maximum capabilities were not high enough to pass Ranger Training.

That is not a prejudice.
Good comment. I have seen some women in action who would clean your clock, some who might clean mine. They have passed the course. Good for them.

So the initial reports claim.

Perhaps it's true.

TO many people invested in the lib agenda for me to assume that none of them might have interfered with the normal training.
Folks all of the time weigh in with vested interests to skew the outcome, yes. I don't think so in this case.
 
One, trolls be a trolling; it's what they do.

Women see combat all the time. They are just not in the combat arms in the Army or the Marines.

They will be great officers.


Calling people names just because they disagree with you, instead of addressing their concerns, is the act of a troll.

Having a belief that woman cannot do the ranger training is not being a misogynist or a troll.

Don't argue with him.

Put him on ignore.

His low I.Q. won't rub off on you.
Sundebl tried what you did, Correll, and got the unholy knocked out of him. He is happier on Ignore. You might be too if you can't take what you dish.

I'm not sure what you mean.

I always try to treat people with the same level of respect they show me.

IF that means always saying Thank You and Your welcome, that's fine.

IF that means a screaming match were the goal seems to be inventing new swear words to call one another, that is less fun for me, but I do not believe in taking the high road.

Or anything in between.

You get to set the level.

Jake yells troll at anyone who dares to show him that his High School diploma is a fraud.

You are wasting your time.
He is unhappy, yes, because he can't take what he attempted to dish. Sundebil is better off on Ignore.
 
They interviewed a soldier that completed training with her, and they said she did great
I bet he did.
I'm having a little trouble figuring out why anyone would resist this.
Resist what? Pussifying our military by making our elite programs less elite in order to accommodate women who are physically unable to meet the physical rigors of the programs?


Quit whining you big baby. It won't effect whether you can lay on the couch and watch Lets Make A Deal every afternoon.
 
Back
Top Bottom