In Afghanistan, As the US Pulls Out the CCP Moves In...

[easyt65]

Trump supported Biden pulling out. Then again Trump said he was pulling the military out. So winning wasn’t an option. At least according to Trump.

Trump backs Afghanistan withdrawal, putting him at odds with some Republicans

Mr. Trump called the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan "wonderful and positive."

www.cbsnews.com

Obama was reportedly pulling troops out of Afghanistan. Instead, not only did he leave them there, he started a new war by invading Syria. As he walked out of the WH he left troops in Syria to fight HIS war. So what's your point?

In fact, Obama presented his 'red line' speech to Assad and then Putin and Assad quickly accepted Obama's demands. Obama obviously knew they would!
That opened the opportunity for Assad to get out from under the WMD excuse America was in the process of manufacturing that would justify a war. The elimination of Syria's WMD's was quickly accomplished to the satisfaction of all parties.
Putin/Russia then walked into Syria with military force, therein nullifying any US designs for a war on Syria. The WMD lie that worked on Iraq, didn't work on Syria. Obama in effect become a champion of peace, while becoming a traitor to his country's foreign policy aggression.

Obama never invaded Syria. Congress refused to authorize it. Obama provided technical support and air assistance to coalition forces fighting ISIS.

When Trump took over as president, he continued with Obama’s program to eradicate ISIS and changed nothing. In fact, Trump bombed a Assad’s airbase, (after telling Putin he was going to do it), something Obama never did.

The troops that Obama left in Syria are still there, guarding the oil fields. Trump ordered them to stop protecting the Kurds from the Turks, but he left those troops in Syria.

Although your understanding of what took place in Syria is convoluted and confused, I think I've given you at least a basic understanding of how it all went down.

Obama obviously had never heard the old Foreign Policy saying, 'never bluff unless you are willing to back it up.'

Barry issued his 'red line' to Al-Assad with no intention of doing anything. Feeling pretty confident due to Putin having his back, al-Assad called his bluff...

...then in front of the whole world - enemies as well as allies - Barry backed down, demonstrating the appearance of weakness. The world laughed.

Barry tried to save facy by declaring to the word his 'red Line' was not just HIS 'Red Line' but was 'THE WORLD'S 'Red Line.
-- The entire world quickly said, 'Oh hell NO It isn't' ... and then laughed at him again.

Later, The Nobel Peace Prize winner committed a United Nations-Defined 'International War Crime' by illegally invading a sovereign nation - SYRIA - without having either the leaders of that nation inviting him to do so OR giving him their permission to do so.

Onthe day he walked out of the WH, he left US military troops in Syria to fight HIS war.


And one of the 1st things Biden did when he entered the WH was to ESCALATE Barry's War by sending in more troops.

Do you ever post anything that isn’t a lie.

Obama gave his “red line in the sand” speech before asking Congress for permission to go to war in Syria. It was the Republican Congress which refused to authorize military action in Syria that caused Obama to back down.

For Republicans they got to publicly publicly embarrass Obama in front of the world. And then forever after blame him for backing down.

Republicans also blamed Obama for pulling out Iraq. W sign the withdrawal of forces agreement that called for US troops to leave Iraq, AFTER he left office.

This ensured that whatever happened thereafter would be blamed on the next guy. That’s much too clever by half for W who wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. I suspect that Cheney was behind that one.

You're too wrapped up in your domestic politics to be able to accept the facts on why Syria was saved from another US led war.

That's o.k., I'm still convinced that Obama was one of the greatest. And so does Russia. Obama purposely hijacked the propaganda effort to demonize Syria with another WMD lie that would result in war. It was the perfect demand by Obama that Assad and Putin would never turn down.

And then didn't America scream and pretend that Assad didn't comply!

Barry arguably committed a U. N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without its leaders' / govt's permission to do so or approval to do so.

Barry called out al-Assad for using chem weapons against his own people - he issued his 'Red Line'...and al-Assad, backed by Russia, humiliated Barry in front of the whole world by calling Barry's bluff he was not willing to follow through on.

His attempt to claim it was not HIS 'red line' but was instead the ENTIRE WORLD'S 'red line' was especially humiliating. Instead of joining them the world laughed at him.


What is the reason for invading Syria? With Russia/Putin protecting al-Assad there was no way we were ever going to be allowed to overthrow al-Assad / Syria. So why did the Nobel Peace Prize Winner start a new war?

And why did Biden escalate Barry's war as soon as he got in office by sending more US troops into Syria?

 

[Donald H]

China is about to demostrate how Afghanistan can be won over by peaceful means.

Is this war going to be America's last full scale war of aggression? Two good reason why it's likely.

1. The US never becomes the conquerer that can stay in the country as an accepted occupier.

2. China and Russia are moving in to contested countries as invited and friendly guests.

The rest of the world is past accepting US war on small countries, that was acceptable in the past with British, American, and other's attempts at colonialism. And the redbaiting scare doesn't sell anymore.

US attempts to influence Afghanistan will continue but in a less visible way. As with Syria, the country's people will still suffer under US bombs, but just not claimed as being on the part of America.

The US occupation of Haiti is now in the cards, but it will be claimed to be by invitation. How can that further US interests in holding control over the America's?

And how can America possibly maintain some influence in Cuba?

 

[Dragonlady]

Trump supported Biden pulling out. Then again Trump said he was pulling the military out. So winning wasn’t an option. At least according to Trump.

Trump backs Afghanistan withdrawal, putting him at odds with some Republicans

Mr. Trump called the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan "wonderful and positive."

www.cbsnews.com

Obama was reportedly pulling troops out of Afghanistan. Instead, not only did he leave them there, he started a new war by invading Syria. As he walked out of the WH he left troops in Syria to fight HIS war. So what's your point?

In fact, Obama presented his 'red line' speech to Assad and then Putin and Assad quickly accepted Obama's demands. Obama obviously knew they would!
That opened the opportunity for Assad to get out from under the WMD excuse America was in the process of manufacturing that would justify a war. The elimination of Syria's WMD's was quickly accomplished to the satisfaction of all parties.
Putin/Russia then walked into Syria with military force, therein nullifying any US designs for a war on Syria. The WMD lie that worked on Iraq, didn't work on Syria. Obama in effect become a champion of peace, while becoming a traitor to his country's foreign policy aggression.

Obama never invaded Syria. Congress refused to authorize it. Obama provided technical support and air assistance to coalition forces fighting ISIS.

When Trump took over as president, he continued with Obama’s program to eradicate ISIS and changed nothing. In fact, Trump bombed a Assad’s airbase, (after telling Putin he was going to do it), something Obama never did.

The troops that Obama left in Syria are still there, guarding the oil fields. Trump ordered them to stop protecting the Kurds from the Turks, but he left those troops in Syria.

Although your understanding of what took place in Syria is convoluted and confused, I think I've given you at least a basic understanding of how it all went down.

Obama obviously had never heard the old Foreign Policy saying, 'never bluff unless you are willing to back it up.'

Barry issued his 'red line' to Al-Assad with no intention of doing anything. Feeling pretty confident due to Putin having his back, al-Assad called his bluff...

...then in front of the whole world - enemies as well as allies - Barry backed down, demonstrating the appearance of weakness. The world laughed.

Barry tried to save facy by declaring to the word his 'red Line' was not just HIS 'Red Line' but was 'THE WORLD'S 'Red Line.
-- The entire world quickly said, 'Oh hell NO It isn't' ... and then laughed at him again.

Later, The Nobel Peace Prize winner committed a United Nations-Defined 'International War Crime' by illegally invading a sovereign nation - SYRIA - without having either the leaders of that nation inviting him to do so OR giving him their permission to do so.

Onthe day he walked out of the WH, he left US military troops in Syria to fight HIS war.


And one of the 1st things Biden did when he entered the WH was to ESCALATE Barry's War by sending in more troops.

Do you ever post anything that isn’t a lie.

Obama gave his “red line in the sand” speech before asking Congress for permission to go to war in Syria. It was the Republican Congress which refused to authorize military action in Syria that caused Obama to back down.

For Republicans they got to publicly publicly embarrass Obama in front of the world. And then forever after blame him for backing down.

Republicans also blamed Obama for pulling out Iraq. W sign the withdrawal of forces agreement that called for US troops to leave Iraq, AFTER he left office.

This ensured that whatever happened thereafter would be blamed on the next guy. That’s much too clever by half for W who wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. I suspect that Cheney was behind that one.

You're too wrapped up in your domestic politics to be able to accept the facts on why Syria was saved from another US led war.

That's o.k., I'm still convinced that Obama was one of the greatest. And so does Russia. Obama purposely hijacked the propaganda effort to demonize Syria with another WMD lie that would result in war. It was the perfect demand by Obama that Assad and Putin would never turn down.

And then didn't America scream and pretend that Assad didn't comply!

Barry arguably committed a U. N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without its leaders' / govt's permission to do so or approval to do so.

Barry called out al-Assad for using chem weapons against his own people - he issued his 'Red Line'...and al-Assad, backed by Russia, humiliated Barry in front of the whole world by calling Barry's bluff he was not willing to follow through on.

His attempt to claim it was not HIS 'red line' but was instead the ENTIRE WORLD'S 'red line' was especially humiliating. Instead of joining them the world lagued at him.


What is the reason for invading Syria? With Russia/Putin protecting al-Assad there was no way we were ever going to be allowed to overthrow al-Assad / Syria. So why did the Nobel Peace Prize Winner start a new war?

And why did Biden escalate Barry's war as soon as he got in office by sending more US troops into Syria?

Skeazy, I didn’t even read your bullshit and I’m not going to respond to it.

You’ve got nothing but Russian propaganda an anti-American lies. You promote the party which has crash led the economy four times and destroyed the reputation and standing of the United States throughout the world.

You voted for a lawless criminal out to destroy the country to get his revenge on the bankers who wouldn’t lend to him and the elites who didn’t respect him.

You hate the United States and everything it stands for and it shows in all of your posts. You don’t stand for truth justice and the American way, you stand for hate, prejudice and the destruction of the American economy.

 

[Donald H]

Trump supported Biden pulling out. Then again Trump said he was pulling the military out. So winning wasn’t an option. At least according to Trump.

Trump backs Afghanistan withdrawal, putting him at odds with some Republicans

Mr. Trump called the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan "wonderful and positive."

www.cbsnews.com

Obama was reportedly pulling troops out of Afghanistan. Instead, not only did he leave them there, he started a new war by invading Syria. As he walked out of the WH he left troops in Syria to fight HIS war. So what's your point?

In fact, Obama presented his 'red line' speech to Assad and then Putin and Assad quickly accepted Obama's demands. Obama obviously knew they would!
That opened the opportunity for Assad to get out from under the WMD excuse America was in the process of manufacturing that would justify a war. The elimination of Syria's WMD's was quickly accomplished to the satisfaction of all parties.
Putin/Russia then walked into Syria with military force, therein nullifying any US designs for a war on Syria. The WMD lie that worked on Iraq, didn't work on Syria. Obama in effect become a champion of peace, while becoming a traitor to his country's foreign policy aggression.

Obama never invaded Syria. Congress refused to authorize it. Obama provided technical support and air assistance to coalition forces fighting ISIS.

When Trump took over as president, he continued with Obama’s program to eradicate ISIS and changed nothing. In fact, Trump bombed a Assad’s airbase, (after telling Putin he was going to do it), something Obama never did.

The troops that Obama left in Syria are still there, guarding the oil fields. Trump ordered them to stop protecting the Kurds from the Turks, but he left those troops in Syria.

Although your understanding of what took place in Syria is convoluted and confused, I think I've given you at least a basic understanding of how it all went down.

Obama obviously had never heard the old Foreign Policy saying, 'never bluff unless you are willing to back it up.'

Barry issued his 'red line' to Al-Assad with no intention of doing anything. Feeling pretty confident due to Putin having his back, al-Assad called his bluff...

...then in front of the whole world - enemies as well as allies - Barry backed down, demonstrating the appearance of weakness. The world laughed.

Barry tried to save facy by declaring to the word his 'red Line' was not just HIS 'Red Line' but was 'THE WORLD'S 'Red Line.
-- The entire world quickly said, 'Oh hell NO It isn't' ... and then laughed at him again.

Later, The Nobel Peace Prize winner committed a United Nations-Defined 'International War Crime' by illegally invading a sovereign nation - SYRIA - without having either the leaders of that nation inviting him to do so OR giving him their permission to do so.

Onthe day he walked out of the WH, he left US military troops in Syria to fight HIS war.


And one of the 1st things Biden did when he entered the WH was to ESCALATE Barry's War by sending in more troops.

Do you ever post anything that isn’t a lie.

Obama gave his “red line in the sand” speech before asking Congress for permission to go to war in Syria. It was the Republican Congress which refused to authorize military action in Syria that caused Obama to back down.

For Republicans they got to publicly publicly embarrass Obama in front of the world. And then forever after blame him for backing down.

Republicans also blamed Obama for pulling out Iraq. W sign the withdrawal of forces agreement that called for US troops to leave Iraq, AFTER he left office.

This ensured that whatever happened thereafter would be blamed on the next guy. That’s much too clever by half for W who wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. I suspect that Cheney was behind that one.

You're too wrapped up in your domestic politics to be able to accept the facts on why Syria was saved from another US led war.

That's o.k., I'm still convinced that Obama was one of the greatest. And so does Russia. Obama purposely hijacked the propaganda effort to demonize Syria with another WMD lie that would result in war. It was the perfect demand by Obama that Assad and Putin would never turn down.

And then didn't America scream and pretend that Assad didn't comply!

Barry arguably committed a U. N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without its leaders' / govt's permission to do so or approval to do so.

Barry called out al-Assad for using chem weapons against his own people - he issued his 'Red Line'...and al-Assad, backed by Russia, humiliated Barry in front of the whole world by calling Barry's bluff he was not willing to follow through on.

That's an interesting political spin on the facts, but close enough when you say that Obama wasn't willing to follow through. And of course, after Russia went into Syria with a large force, America couldn't begin a bombing campaign even if it wanted.

His attempt to claim it was not HIS 'red line' but was instead the ENTIRE WORLD'S 'red line' was especially humiliating. Instead of joining them the world lagued at him.

Your spin is motivated by your own domestic politics but it's acceptable now after the fact.
Assad wasn't using chem/bio weapons on his own people and had no need to because the US fomented skirmishes were being settled with conventional weapons. (Those being US conventional WMD weapons.

America's demonizing hoaxs on chem/bio weapons use had bee exposed in Iraq decades earlier.

What is the reason for invading Syria? With Russia/Putin protecting al-Assad there was no way we were ever going to be allowed to overthrow al-Assad / Syria. So why did the Nobel Peace Prize Winner start a new war?

In Syria? What war?
And that's not to suggest that Obama received the Nobel prize for preventing the US planned war in Syria.

And why did Biden escalate Barry's war as soon as he got in office by sending more US troops into Syria?

A good question! I would suggest that any US withdrawn of it's troops from a region of the world is usually replaced with more troops in some other country.

Biden's one of America's hawks and he wouldn't miss the opportunity. In any case, US presense in Syria is well below warmaking levels. It's well regulated by co-operation with Russia's demands and interests.

 

[Donald H]

It's rather comical hearing how Trump would have been the hero if he pulled out of Afghanistan as promised, and then would have been the hero if he didn't.

Trump had shown that he had no concept on what could be done or should be done.

It's more likely that Trump was being kept insulated from any foreign policy strategic decisions.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Strange that the US is actually conceding defeat to the Taliban and even taking measures to ensure that the Afghan military won't stand much of a chance of stopping their enemy.

Destroying the infrastructure of the US military base is saying loud and clear that the US knows the Afghan army will lose it quickly.

Another complete US military failure that had no purpose other than appeasing the American people's bloodlust with another slaughter of a country's people.

Other nations that took part in Afghanistan with humanitarian efforts, might as well been fighting against the US.

When and on which small country will America attempt it's next bombing campaign? What cause can be manufactured by the US to save Venezuela's people with bombs?

Are there any countries left that haven't completely rejected US imperialism by turning to China for free trade and China's way of peace?

Simmering Simians

The lands you feel so multicultie about aren't countries; they are wildlife preserves.

My opinion doesn't count. Americans themselves have proclaimed that America's cities are 'shitholes'.

I would only cautiously disagree, for now at least.

But I 'would' suggest that America is a racist 'shithole' that's bound it's own hands with it's domestic political fight!

To China's and Russia's benefit!

Feral Fraternity

The foreign savages knew that our giving rights to our own savages was a sign of decadent weakness and a signal to attack.

Just exactly who are "our own savages'?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump supported Biden pulling out. Then again Trump said he was pulling the military out. So winning wasn’t an option. At least according to Trump.

Trump backs Afghanistan withdrawal, putting him at odds with some Republicans

Mr. Trump called the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan "wonderful and positive."

www.cbsnews.com

Obama was reportedly pulling troops out of Afghanistan. Instead, not only did he leave them there, he started a new war by invading Syria. As he walked out of the WH he left troops in Syria to fight HIS war. So what's your point?

In fact, Obama presented his 'red line' speech to Assad and then Putin and Assad quickly accepted Obama's demands. Obama obviously knew they would!
That opened the opportunity for Assad to get out from under the WMD excuse America was in the process of manufacturing that would justify a war. The elimination of Syria's WMD's was quickly accomplished to the satisfaction of all parties.
Putin/Russia then walked into Syria with military force, therein nullifying any US designs for a war on Syria. The WMD lie that worked on Iraq, didn't work on Syria. Obama in effect become a champion of peace, while becoming a traitor to his country's foreign policy aggression.

Obama never invaded Syria. Congress refused to authorize it. Obama provided technical support and air assistance to coalition forces fighting ISIS.

When Trump took over as president, he continued with Obama’s program to eradicate ISIS and changed nothing. In fact, Trump bombed a Assad’s airbase, (after telling Putin he was going to do it), something Obama never did.

The troops that Obama left in Syria are still there, guarding the oil fields. Trump ordered them to stop protecting the Kurds from the Turks, but he left those troops in Syria.

Although your understanding of what took place in Syria is convoluted and confused, I think I've given you at least a basic understanding of how it all went down.

Obama obviously had never heard the old Foreign Policy saying, 'never bluff unless you are willing to back it up.'

Barry issued his 'red line' to Al-Assad with no intention of doing anything. Feeling pretty confident due to Putin having his back, al-Assad called his bluff...

...then in front of the whole world - enemies as well as allies - Barry backed down, demonstrating the appearance of weakness. The world laughed.

Barry tried to save facy by declaring to the word his 'red Line' was not just HIS 'Red Line' but was 'THE WORLD'S 'Red Line.
-- The entire world quickly said, 'Oh hell NO It isn't' ... and then laughed at him again.

Later, The Nobel Peace Prize winner committed a United Nations-Defined 'International War Crime' by illegally invading a sovereign nation - SYRIA - without having either the leaders of that nation inviting him to do so OR giving him their permission to do so.

Onthe day he walked out of the WH, he left US military troops in Syria to fight HIS war.


And one of the 1st things Biden did when he entered the WH was to ESCALATE Barry's War by sending in more troops.

Do you ever post anything that isn’t a lie.

Obama gave his “red line in the sand” speech before asking Congress for permission to go to war in Syria. It was the Republican Congress which refused to authorize military action in Syria that caused Obama to back down.

For Republicans they got to publicly publicly embarrass Obama in front of the world. And then forever after blame him for backing down.

Republicans also blamed Obama for pulling out Iraq. W sign the withdrawal of forces agreement that called for US troops to leave Iraq, AFTER he left office.

This ensured that whatever happened thereafter would be blamed on the next guy. That’s much too clever by half for W who wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. I suspect that Cheney was behind that one.

You're too wrapped up in your domestic politics to be able to accept the facts on why Syria was saved from another US led war.

That's o.k., I'm still convinced that Obama was one of the greatest. And so does Russia. Obama purposely hijacked the propaganda effort to demonize Syria with another WMD lie that would result in war. It was the perfect demand by Obama that Assad and Putin would never turn down.

And then didn't America scream and pretend that Assad didn't comply!

Barry arguably committed a U. N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without its leaders' / govt's permission to do so or approval to do so.

Barry called out al-Assad for using chem weapons against his own people - he issued his 'Red Line'...and al-Assad, backed by Russia, humiliated Barry in front of the whole world by calling Barry's bluff he was not willing to follow through on.

His attempt to claim it was not HIS 'red line' but was instead the ENTIRE WORLD'S 'red line' was especially humiliating. Instead of joining them the world lagued at him.


What is the reason for invading Syria? With Russia/Putin protecting al-Assad there was no way we were ever going to be allowed to overthrow al-Assad / Syria. So why did the Nobel Peace Prize Winner start a new war?

And why did Biden escalate Barry's war as soon as he got in office by sending more US troops into Syria?

The world "laqued at him"?

 

[JWBooth]

Chinese investment vs US military occupation. It’s unimaginable that the Afghans would prefer the Chinese option.

 

[JWBooth]

Let China waste billions of dollars on Afghanistan because they ( The Taliban ) will stab them in the back…

So long as the Chinese don’t seek to remake Afghan society and just do business it is unlikely.

 

[easyt65]

untry's foreign policy aggression.

The world "laqued at him"?

Not bright enough to make out the word despite the typo, huh?! Sad...

 

[easyt65]

Trump supported Biden pulling out. Then again Trump said he was pulling the military out. So winning wasn’t an option. At least according to Trump.

Trump backs Afghanistan withdrawal, putting him at odds with some Republicans

Mr. Trump called the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan "wonderful and positive."

www.cbsnews.com

Obama was reportedly pulling troops out of Afghanistan. Instead, not only did he leave them there, he started a new war by invading Syria. As he walked out of the WH he left troops in Syria to fight HIS war. So what's your point?

In fact, Obama presented his 'red line' speech to Assad and then Putin and Assad quickly accepted Obama's demands. Obama obviously knew they would!
That opened the opportunity for Assad to get out from under the WMD excuse America was in the process of manufacturing that would justify a war. The elimination of Syria's WMD's was quickly accomplished to the satisfaction of all parties.
Putin/Russia then walked into Syria with military force, therein nullifying any US designs for a war on Syria. The WMD lie that worked on Iraq, didn't work on Syria. Obama in effect become a champion of peace, while becoming a traitor to his country's foreign policy aggression.

Obama never invaded Syria. Congress refused to authorize it. Obama provided technical support and air assistance to coalition forces fighting ISIS.

When Trump took over as president, he continued with Obama’s program to eradicate ISIS and changed nothing. In fact, Trump bombed a Assad’s airbase, (after telling Putin he was going to do it), something Obama never did.

The troops that Obama left in Syria are still there, guarding the oil fields. Trump ordered them to stop protecting the Kurds from the Turks, but he left those troops in Syria.

Although your understanding of what took place in Syria is convoluted and confused, I think I've given you at least a basic understanding of how it all went down.

Obama obviously had never heard the old Foreign Policy saying, 'never bluff unless you are willing to back it up.'

Barry issued his 'red line' to Al-Assad with no intention of doing anything. Feeling pretty confident due to Putin having his back, al-Assad called his bluff...

...then in front of the whole world - enemies as well as allies - Barry backed down, demonstrating the appearance of weakness. The world laughed.

Barry tried to save facy by declaring to the word his 'red Line' was not just HIS 'Red Line' but was 'THE WORLD'S 'Red Line.
-- The entire world quickly said, 'Oh hell NO It isn't' ... and then laughed at him again.

Later, The Nobel Peace Prize winner committed a United Nations-Defined 'International War Crime' by illegally invading a sovereign nation - SYRIA - without having either the leaders of that nation inviting him to do so OR giving him their permission to do so.

Onthe day he walked out of the WH, he left US military troops in Syria to fight HIS war.


And one of the 1st things Biden did when he entered the WH was to ESCALATE Barry's War by sending in more troops.

Do you ever post anything that isn’t a lie.

Obama gave his “red line in the sand” speech before asking Congress for permission to go to war in Syria. It was the Republican Congress which refused to authorize military action in Syria that caused Obama to back down.

For Republicans they got to publicly publicly embarrass Obama in front of the world. And then forever after blame him for backing down.

Republicans also blamed Obama for pulling out Iraq. W sign the withdrawal of forces agreement that called for US troops to leave Iraq, AFTER he left office.

This ensured that whatever happened thereafter would be blamed on the next guy. That’s much too clever by half for W who wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. I suspect that Cheney was behind that one.

You're too wrapped up in your domestic politics to be able to accept the facts on why Syria was saved from another US led war.

That's o.k., I'm still convinced that Obama was one of the greatest. And so does Russia. Obama purposely hijacked the propaganda effort to demonize Syria with another WMD lie that would result in war. It was the perfect demand by Obama that Assad and Putin would never turn down.

And then didn't America scream and pretend that Assad didn't comply!

Barry arguably committed a U. N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without its leaders' / govt's permission to do so or approval to do so.

Barry called out al-Assad for using chem weapons against his own people - he issued his 'Red Line'...and al-Assad, backed by Russia, humiliated Barry in front of the whole world by calling Barry's bluff he was not willing to follow through on.

That's an interesting political spin on the facts, but close enough when you say that Obama wasn't willing to follow through. And of course, after Russia went into Syria with a large force, America couldn't begin a bombing campaign even if it wanted.

His attempt to claim it was not HIS 'red line' but was instead the ENTIRE WORLD'S 'red line' was especially humiliating. Instead of joining them the world lagued at him.

Your spin is motivated by your own domestic politics but it's acceptable now after the fact.
Assad wasn't using chem/bio weapons on his own people and had no need to because the US fomented skirmishes were being settled with conventional weapons. (Those being US conventional WMD weapons.

America's demonizing hoaxs on chem/bio weapons use had bee exposed in Iraq decades earlier.

What is the reason for invading Syria? With Russia/Putin protecting al-Assad there was no way we were ever going to be allowed to overthrow al-Assad / Syria. So why did the Nobel Peace Prize Winner start a new war?

In Syria? What war?
And that's not to suggest that Obama received the Nobel prize for preventing the US planned war in Syria.

And why did Biden escalate Barry's war as soon as he got in office by sending more US troops into Syria?

A good question! I would suggest that any US withdrawn of it's troops from a region of the world is usually replaced with more troops in some other country.

Biden's one of America's hawks and he wouldn't miss the opportunity. In any case, US presense in Syria is well below warmaking levels. It's well regulated by co-operation with Russia's demands and interests.

Sorry, I had to stop reading when you ignorantly and falsely seemed to claim Al-Assad did NOT use chem weapons on his own people:

By using poison gas against his own people, Bashar al-Assad has achieved two goals. First, he has humiliated the United Sates and Europe. He proved that Obama's “red line” policy was meaningless and that Western nations were unable—or unwilling—to intervene in the conflict.

What is the reason for invading Syria? With Russia/Putin protecting al-Assad there was no way we were ever going to be allowed to overthrow al-Assad / Syria. So why did the Nobel Peace Prize Winner start a new war?

"In Syria? What war?"

Attempting to play 'stupid' - while it maybe true - is the dumbest f*ing ploy you could attempt seeing as how barry invaded Syria with US troops and Biden escalated the war by sending more troops into Syria.

These two are more than enough to dismiss everything you have said / say because you destroyed your own credibility.

For Bashar Al-Assad, Crossing Obama's Red Line Was a Win-Win

Assad's international standing has improved, not despite his having used chemical weapons against the Syrian people, but precisely because he did, says Anna Momigliano.

www.thedailybeast.com

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

untry's foreign policy aggression.

The world "laqued at him"?

Not bright enough to make out the word despite the typo, huh?! Sad...

That was one HELL of a typo!

 

[JWBooth]

 

[justoffal]

China Is Now ‘Welcomed With Open Arms’​

Following US Departure From Afghanistan;​

Plans to Invest $62 Billion, Expanding Its​

“Belt and Road” Initiative​

"After years of working to re-legitimize America’s credibility and strength when confronting foreign policy, Donald Trump moved to make good on his promise to end the ‘forever wars’ and called to have all of our brave sons and daughters return home.

Trump was lambasted by just about everyone in the media for his actions

Now 6 months later, as Biden is cheered for pulling the remaining US forces out of the region, Beijing is gleefully stepping in to invest $62 Billion in Afghanistan to continue furthering its 60-country, $3 trillion ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative.

Afghani leaders had been terrified for years about upsetting Trump’s Washington over talks with the communist Chinese; but now that Biden is in office, officials are welcoming the CCP with open arms.

Not only has this laughing-stock completely weakened our stance and removed all credibility from the office of the leader of the free world, he has elevated radicals to prominent roles in his administration who are working to undermine the strength of our military and giving comfort to terrorists like the Taliban."


Way to go, Joe.

China Is Now ‘Welcomed With Open Arms’ Following US Departure From Afghanistan; Plans to Invest $62 Billion, Expanding Its "Belt and Road" Initiative | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by Julian Conradson After years of working to re-legitimize America’s credibility and strength when confronting foreign policy, Donald Trump moved to make good on his promise to end the ‘forever wars’ and called to have all of our brave sons and daughters return home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wow what a coincidence Biden does yet another thing that benefits China immensely. Geez I wonder what bank account the Chinese filled up for him this time?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Let China take it. It will be their Vietnam, just like it was for the Soviets. They will waste trillions of dollars and tens of thousands of Chinese lives and hundreds of thousands of Afghanstani lives and leave like everyone else from Alexander the Great on: defeated.

 

[surada]

Let them have it.

Change our laws so that if you are caught with an opiate derivative for sale on our streets, you face a death sentence. Then carry out a few of them to prove you mean what you say.

The ONLY reason that China would want Afghanistan is for the poppy crop.

Afghanistan has a trillion dollars in natural resources and in the past 15 years China has built the infrastructure to get them to market.

 

[surada]

Wow what a coincidence Biden does yet another thing that benefits China immensely. Geez I wonder what bank account the Chinese filled up for him this time?

China has been in Afghanistan building railroads, power plants, dams, and mining operations for 15 years.. The also completed the critical Port at Gwadar.

 

[surada]

China Is Now ‘Welcomed With Open Arms’ ​

Following US Departure From Afghanistan; ​

Plans to Invest $62 Billion, Expanding Its ​

“Belt and Road” Initiative​

"After years of working to re-legitimize America’s credibility and strength when confronting foreign policy, Donald Trump moved to make good on his promise to end the ‘forever wars’ and called to have all of our brave sons and daughters return home.

Trump was lambasted by just about everyone in the media for his actions

Now 6 months later, as Biden is cheered for pulling the remaining US forces out of the region, Beijing is gleefully stepping in to invest $62 Billion in Afghanistan to continue furthering its 60-country, $3 trillion ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative.

Afghani leaders had been terrified for years about upsetting Trump’s Washington over talks with the communist Chinese; but now that Biden is in office, officials are welcoming the CCP with open arms.

Not only has this laughing-stock completely weakened our stance and removed all credibility from the office of the leader of the free world, he has elevated radicals to prominent roles in his administration who are working to undermine the strength of our military and giving comfort to terrorists like the Taliban."


Way to go, Joe.

China Is Now ‘Welcomed With Open Arms’ Following US Departure From Afghanistan; Plans to Invest $62 Billion, Expanding Its "Belt and Road" Initiative | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by Julian Conradson After years of working to re-legitimize America’s credibility and strength when confronting foreign policy, Donald Trump moved to make good on his promise to end the ‘forever wars’ and called to have all of our brave sons and daughters return home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

This is Gateway Pundit BS. China has been building infrastructure in Afghanistan for 2 decades... Dams, roads, railroads, power plants, mining operations and Port Gwadar.

 

[Darkwind]

Afghanistan has a trillion dollars in natural resources and in the past 15 years China has built the infrastructure to get them to market.

I don't care.

 

[surada]

I don't care.

Fine, but don't lie and say the Chinese are moving in. They have been there for well over a decade.