In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’

He stepped between the ICE agent who was assaulting an innocent woman, and a fellow human being in need of medical attention.

Not innocent, another person interfering with law enforcement. ICE doesn't have the time or desire to go after people just filming from a distance.
 
They aren't just filming, they are blocking the road and trying to interfere with officers doing their lawful duties.
How is a jaywalking violation, interference?
Did it permanently enjoin ICE from arresting anybody?

In you, the hypocrisy runs deep.
 
Yet you said that Trumps words meant NOTHING!!!!

Compared to a proposed legislative bill.

I said no such thing. I said I am not worried about this admin doing anything.

Again you play the "one bad thing means I need to abandon Trump" game, which is a bullshit game.
 
Supreme Court has ruled it proper to film law enforcement. You don't pay much attention to their rulings, do you?
The constitution is just a piece of paper.
 

In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’​

2,939
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison speaks at the 2025 Netroots Nation progressive po
Dominic Gwinn / Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
AWR Hawkins26 Jan 20264,023
In 2024, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D) was among 17 AGs who contended there is no right to carry a gun at “political rallies and protests.”



didn't this creep also believe you can beat up your girl friend
Well, he is a woman beating asshole.
 
How is a jaywalking violation, interference?
Did it permanently enjoin ICE from arresting anybody?

In you, the hypocrisy runs deep.

It's not jaywalking, it's interfering with law enforcement.
 
He was trying to help a woman up that ICE had knocked to the ground for filming them.

She was interfering with law enforcement. They have no reason to do anything to anyone filming them from a distance.

Plenty of people do that already.
 
Yes and MAGA argued you had an absolute right. The cults are strong.
Few if any Conservatives are arguing against right to carry guns. Right or Left, if you are stupid enough to be physically obstructing a law enforcement officer and are carrying a gun, your odds of getting shot skyrocketed.
 
Supreme Court has ruled it proper to film law enforcement. You don't pay much attention to their rulings, do you?

You can't interfere with them while filming them.

SC didn't say you can block them while filming, or get up in their faces while filming.
 
Godwin fail on your part.

What a ******* moron you are.
You were the one claiming that what Trump, Bondi and Patel say, means nothing, until they actually carry out their own words.

I think that's pretty much the same, when those in charge of NAZI Germany revealed their intentions.

And you doubt they would carry them out.
 
You were the one claiming that what Trump, Bondi and Patel say, means nothing, until they actually carry out their own words.

I think that's pretty much the same, when those in charge of NAZI Germany revealed their intentions.

And you doubt they would carry them out.

I am saying this particular thing is meaningless. Not in general, Again you play the "one bad thing means I have to stop supporting them"

Who would I vote for? Dems? a Third party? LOL
 
You can't interfere with them while filming them.

SC didn't say you can block them while filming, or get up in their faces while filming.
There goes the hypocrisy again.
Did the rioters "interfere" with congress on January 6th.

Let the hypocrisy begin with your answer.
 
There goes the hypocrisy again.
Did the rioters "interfere" with congress on January 6th.

Let the hypocrisy begin with your answer.

And Again, if they had just prosecuted them normally it wouldn't be an issue, but the Biden admin went ham and made it personal, and Trump had to correct it.

One day vs. months of this bullshit is not an applicable comparison.

Going up against riot police and security police whos job is and who are equipped to go against rioters isn't the same as law enforcement being engaged by and interfered with people who have nothing to do with what those law enforcement officers are out to do.
 
15th post
I said no such thing. I said I am not worried about this admin doing anything.
Fascinating.
When the entire TOP of law enforcement in the USA says something, and you aren't worried they actually mean what they say.
 
Fascinating.
When the entire TOP of law enforcement in the USA says something, and you aren't worried they actually mean what they say.

In this specific situation no.

Just like I knew Trump wasn't going to invade Greenland like you idiots did.

It's called politics and diplomacy.

I worry about people doing things.
 
Few if any Conservatives are arguing against right to carry guns. Right or Left, if you are stupid enough to be physically obstructing a law enforcement officer and are carrying a gun, your odds of getting shot skyrocketed.

"You can't have guns"
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom