In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’

[martybegan]

Didn't you hear from Trump, Bondi and Pate.
That people have no right to carry a firearm to a protest.

Let the hypocrisy begin.,

Words words words, while Dems are actions actions actions.

I don't go by the "my side makes one mistake and now I have to abandon them" trope. So try it somewhere else.

 

[postman]

Bullshit. What is happening in Minneapolis isn't the rule of law, it's mob rule.

Bullshit you limey ****. If you are an American why do you use a "Royal Post" avatar?

It's in accordance with DC v Heller, a constitutional interpretation. And law of the land.

Suddenly you don't believe in the rule of law.

Let the hypocrisy begin.

 

[Lockback]

Right.



Exhibit A. Hypocrisy.

Zero hypocrisy.
None.
You are literally out of your mind. I have no idea what stupid point you're trying to make but you are failing miserably.
"See! The sun came up this morning so that's proof that rats like cheese!"
Ridiculous bullshit.

 

[martybegan]

J6 is like the poster of Farrah Fawcett they have over their bed with a handful of tissues in their hands. It's their go-to fantasy.
Indeed, it is sad and pathetic.

For most of these guys, it would be Zack from Saved by the Bell actually.

 

[postman]

Words words words, while Dems are actions actions actions.

Words of ALL the top law enforcement people in the USA.

Let that sink in. They're the one's who actually carry out the law.
And that's their position.

You think a proposed law, means more than those responsible for the execution of law?

Let the hypocrisy go into overtime.

 

[martybegan]

It's in accordance with DC v Heller, a constitutional interpretation. And law of the land.

Suddenly you don't believe in the rule of law.

Let the hypocrisy begin.

Once he engaged with law enforcement, it went from a carry issue to an interfering with law enforcement issue.

But keep thinking this is some "gotcha" moment, limey.

 

[Lockback]

For most of these guys, it would be Zack from Saved by the Bell actually.

That made me laugh out loud!

 

[martybegan]

Words of ALL the top law enforcement people in the USA.

Let that sink in. They're the one's who actually carry out the law.
And that's their position.

You think a proposed law, means more than those responsible for the execution of law?

Let the hypocrisy go into overtime.

And nothing will happen because of those words.

Meanwhile in NYC I need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $600 just to keep revolver in my own apartment. Not carry, just keep in my own place. In Virginia they are proposing multiple gun grabber laws, and Dems control the legislature there AND the governor's mansion.

I think you are playing the "gotcha" game like a poseur.

 

[postman]

Once he engaged with law enforcement, it went from a carry issue to an interfering with law enforcement issue.

He was using his cell phone to video on a public street, the actions of law enforcement on a public street.

Now you're against the 1st amendment too?

That hypocrisy is getting pretty deep in here.

 

[pknopp]

And nothing will happen because of those words.

Meanwhile in NYC I need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $600 just to keep revolver in my own apartment. Not carry, just keep in my own place. In Virginia they are proposing multiple gun grabber laws, and Dems control the legislature there AND the governor's mansion.

I think you are playing the "gotcha" game like a poseur.

Supreme Court ruled NYers have the right to carry.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

 

[postman]

And nothing will happen because of those words.

Just like Trump never imposed the tariffs after he said the words that he would?

Are you jumping the shark now?

All three TOP people responsible for law enforcement in the USA are saying they're not going to abide by DC v Heller.

And you think a legislative bill has more meaning.

 

[martybegan]

He was using his cell phone to video on a public street, the actions of law enforcement on a public street.

Now you're against the 1st amendment too?

That hypocrisy is getting pretty deep in here.

He wasn't shot when doing that. he was shot when interfering with law enforcement physically.

 

[Lockback]

He was using his cell phone to video on a public street, the actions of law enforcement on a public street.

Now you're against the 1st amendment too?

That hypocrisy is getting pretty deep in here.

Your ability to simply lie is pretty deep.
He didn't just video what was going on ... he got in the middle of it. For the second time in one week, I might add. He got right in there between law enforcement and the suspect.
And that was a really, really, really stupid ******* thing to do.
But of course, you'll continue to spout your attempts to prove non-existent "hypocrisy" because that's all your weak side has.

 

[martybegan]

Just like Trump never imposed the tariffs after he said the words that he would?

Are you jumping the shark now?

All three TOP people responsible for law enforcement in the USA are saying they're not going to abide by DC v Heller.

And you think a legislative bill has more meaning.

I'm OK with the tariff game he is playing, it's been helping more than hurting.

Who. the. ****. cares. until. they. actually. try. to. do. something.

Of course bills have more meaning, you ignorant ****. One is action, the other is just words.

 

[pknopp]

He wasn't shot when doing that. he was shot when interfering with law enforcement physically.

He was trying to help a woman up that ICE had knocked to the ground for filming them.

 

[postman]

He wasn't shot when doing that. he was shot when interfering with law enforcement physically.

He stepped between the ICE agent who was assaulting an innocent woman, and a fellow human being in need of medical attention.

 

[martybegan]

He was trying to help a woman up that ICE had knocked to the ground for filming them.

He was interfering with law enforcement.

She was interfering with law enforcement.

They aren't just filming, they are blocking the road and trying to interfere with officers doing their lawful duties.

 

[Lockback]

He stepped between the ICE agent who was assaulting an innocent woman, and a fellow human being in need of medical attention.

Yeah, you just keep believing that.

 

[postman]

I'm OK with the tariff game he is playing, it's been helping more than hurting.

Yet you said that Trumps words meant NOTHING!!!!

Compared to a proposed legislative bill.

 

[pknopp]

He was interfering with law enforcement.

She was interfering with law enforcement.

They aren't just filming, they are blocking the road and trying to interfere with officers doing their lawful duties.

Supreme Court has ruled it proper to film law enforcement. You don't pay much attention to their rulings, do you?