IN 2020, the CIA lied to the US Senate, saying that the Hunter Biden laptop story was "Russian disinformation"

[Rawley]

Yes. Are we supposed to trust Republicans about the content of this briefing?

More than the scum that were caught lying to Congress, yes.

 

[Marener]

Trust is not an issue. The congressional record will reflect the testimony. You will have an opportunity to refute the testimony.

What testimony? The issue came from a tweet that you said I don’t have to trust.

 

[Hollie]

What testimony? The issue came from a tweet that you said I don’t have to trust.

Trust the Democrats.

 

[marvin martian]

The CIA initially ignored requests for testimony regarding Hunter's laptop in 2020 because they realized House Repubs were using the investigation for political reasons. Nothing has changed since then.

Many of the "former intelligence officials" who signed the fake letter repeating Biden's lie about "Russian disinformation" were not , in fact, "former", they were actively employed by the CIA at the time.

From my link:
Additionally, some of the statement's signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time they issued the statement to discredit damaging allegations about Biden family influence peddling. Despite claiming they lacked access to classified information at the time, at least two signatories—Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were actively working for the CIA as contractors. This revelation raises concerns that these officials may have abused their positions to expedite the statement's approval and may have been earning taxpayer dollars while they did it.

 

[Marener]

Trust the Democrats.

I never said anything about trusting democrats. You didn’t really mean it when you said we don’t have to trust them. Did you?

 

[Hollie]

I never said anything about trusting democrats. You didn’t really mean it when you said we don’t have to trust them. Did you?

Has any democrat stepped up to refute Mike Lee? You're convinced you can trust Democrats., right?

 

[Marener]

Has any democrat stepped up to refute Mike Lee?

Why would they? Since we don’t have trust Mike Lee, there’s nothing to refute.

 

[Hollie]

Why would they? Since we don’t have trust Mike Lee, there’s nothing to refute.

Nothing to refute except the damaging facts of lies, deceit and election interference by the democrats. Others beside Mike Lee were lied to by the democrats.

 

[Marener]

Nothing to refute except the damaging facts of lies, deceit and election interference by the democrats. Others beside Mike Lee were lied to by the democrats.

Has nothing to do with Mike Lee’s unsubstantiated claims which we dont have to trust.

 

[marvin martian]

Nothing to refute except the damaging facts of lies, deceit and election interference by the democrats. Others beside Mike Lee were lied to by the democrats.

The entire congress was lied to by the CIA, who were colluding with the Biden campaign.

 

[berg80]

It seems you don't take issue with democrats using their years long fraud for political purposes - election interference.

Prosecuting Trump based on grand jury indictments is a legal process not under Dem's control. Unless you think all grand jury members are part of the fictitious deep state that is "out to get Trump." A delusional belief inspired by Trump's false claims designed to obscure the commission of crimes by him and his co-defendants.
There was, however, election interference carried out by Trump at his direction when hush money was paid to the pornographic film star he fucked right after the birth of his son.

 

[marvin martian]

Has nothing to do with Mike Lee’s unsubstantiated claims which we dont have to trust.

The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publication. CIA’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis testified that he informed Director Gina Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop about its impending release. This sequence of events suggests that senior CIA leadership had ample opportunity to assess the validity of the statement's claims. Furthermore, the COO’s office appeared to signal approval of the statement in a move that departed from standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols.

 

[berg80]

Perhaps Mike Lee should produce a transcript of the testimony he claims CIA officers gave so we know whether he is lying.

 

[Marener]

The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publication. CIA’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis testified that he informed Director Gina Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop about its impending release. This sequence of events suggests that senior CIA leadership had ample opportunity to assess the validity of the statement's claims. Furthermore, the COO’s office appeared to signal approval of the statement in a move that departed from standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols.

It is not the CIAs job to get involved in campaigns.

That would be a very dangerous precedent.

 

[marvin martian]

Perhaps Mike Lee should produce a transcript of the testimony he claims CIA officers gave so we know whether he is lying.

So you can call it a "cheap fake"?

No, he's a lot smarter than you. We all are, actually. Most of us don't believe whatever the CIA tells us.

 

[marvin martian]

It is not the CIAs job to get involved in campaigns.

That would be a very dangerous precedent.

Yet they did, as the testimony proves. They lied to congress to help Joe Biden get elected.

 

[Marener]

Yet they did, as the testimony proves. They lied to congress to help Joe Biden get elected.

No lies. Russia was attempting to spread disinformation about Joe Biden to influence the election.

 

[whitehall]

Around 50 current and former "intelligence" specialists lied about Hunter's laptop in order to influence an election. A couple are on the CIA payroll and weren't even fired. How can we trust the intel. community to do anything right? Should they be charged?

 

[Billiejeens]

Around 50 current and former "intelligence" specialists lied about Hunter's laptop in order to influence an election. A couple are on the CIA payroll and weren't even fired. How can we trust the intel. community to do anything right? Should they be charged?

As profession liars they were careful to not actually lie in the letter.

 

[Hollie]

Prosecuting Trump based on grand jury indictments is a legal process not under Dem's control. Unless you think all grand jury members are part of the fictitious deep state that is "out to get Trump." A delusional belief inspired by Trump's false claims designed to obscure the commission of crimes by him and his co-defendants.
There was, however, election interference carried out by Trump at his direction when hush money was paid to the pornographic film star he fucked right after the birth of his son.

That was a frantic retreat from Democrat's lies and falsehoods connected with their :Russia collusion" fraud.