In 2016, Trump (and Epstein) were accused in court of raping a 13-yearold back in the 1990's

Back in 2016, one of the 25 sexual misconduct lawsuits brought against Trump, was that of a woman that stated that she (and Epstein) raped her when she 13-yearold.

A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13-year-old aspiring teen model. In the most recent suit, Trump’s accuser asserted that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her. She also claimed Epstein raped her during that series of gatherings

The accuser, identified in the lawsuit by the pseudonym “Jane Doe,” was expected to appear at a news conference in Los Angeles Wednesday, but that appearance was abruptly canceled.

This lawsuit was filed and then dropped 3 times by the accuser. It was said by her lawyer (Lisa Bloom) that the accuser had received threats and was too frightened to show up".

The court document can be viewed in full at the link below.

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf

Trump has totally denied the accusation (as well as all 26 others) but it does bear mentioning this again now, given the recent news:


This OP is not about opining on the truth or falsity of this news. It is about letting everyone know exactly what has been stated, what has been filed, and what is the story behind it.

You can make your own decisions on the likelihood (or not) of what happened.

One thing to mention though, Trump has stated that he will file a lawsuit against the WSJ for this statement, but then again, I am sure that the WSJ would not state something publicly that they cannot prove in court.

"This OP is not about opining on the truth or falsity of this news. It is about letting everyone know exactly what has been stated, what has been filed, and what is the story behind it."


Let me fix this for you: 'This OP is not about opining on the truth or falsity of this news. It is about resurrecting an old story from a decade ago, that had no merit, in order to muddy the waters and create doubt here in 2025'.
 
"This OP is not about opining on the truth or falsity of this news. It is about letting everyone know exactly what has been stated, what has been filed, and what is the story behind it."


Let me fix this for you: 'This OP is not about opining on the truth or falsity of this news. It is about resurrecting an old story from a decade ago, that had no merit, in order to muddy the waters and create doubt here in 2025'.
May I remind you that the story took a NEW life just 2 days ago, with what the WSJ posted. New evidence came out!

If you have a complaint, take it out on the WSJ, and NOT ME!!!!
 
May I remind you that the story took a NEW life just 2 days ago, with what the WSJ posted. New evidence came out!

If you have a complaint, take it out on the WSJ, and NOT ME!!!!

Yes, but not this particular story that was dismissed years ago.
 
I stated in the OP that it was withdrawn. I made no accusation. I just stated the facts.

Neither you nor I know that it is a lie. We do not know the facts. Withdrawing the accusation does not necessarily mean that it was a lie. Lots of women have done the same, or not even filed an accusation, for the fear of reprisal. That is a known fact.
So, guilt by accusation. Got it
 
TDSSSSDDBSLMAOLOL.


TDS3.webp
 
I stated in the OP that it was withdrawn. I made no accusation. I just stated the facts.

Neither you nor I know that it is a lie. We do not know the facts. Withdrawing the accusation does not necessarily mean that it was a lie. Lots of women have done the same, or not even filed an accusation, for the fear of reprisal. That is a known fact.
You're spreading ACCUSATIONS without proof. You're doing it with h intent. That makes you a liar
 
Maybe this is why USMB requires a link, for IF UNLUCKYQUACKQUACK had come out and said this on his own, Trump would have made him pay BIGGLY; and I would have sent the link directly to Ivanka, and watched her kick his a**, just so it would have happened lol! I might try it anyway, just so the GOP spends a little time sniffing around PAID posters!
You're spreading ACCUSATIONS without proof. You're doing it with h intent. That makes you a li
 
Back in 2016, one of the 25 sexual misconduct lawsuits brought against Trump, was that of a woman that stated that she (and Epstein) raped her when she 13-yearold.

A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13-year-old aspiring teen model. In the most recent suit, Trump’s accuser asserted that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her. She also claimed Epstein raped her during that series of gatherings

The accuser, identified in the lawsuit by the pseudonym “Jane Doe,” was expected to appear at a news conference in Los Angeles Wednesday, but that appearance was abruptly canceled.

This lawsuit was filed and then dropped 3 times by the accuser. It was said by her lawyer (Lisa Bloom) that the accuser had received threats and was too frightened to show up".

The court document can be viewed in full at the link below.

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf

Trump has totally denied the accusation (as well as all 26 others) but it does bear mentioning this again now, given the recent news:


This OP is not about opining on the truth or falsity of this news. It is about letting everyone know exactly what has been stated, what has been filed, and what is the story behind it.

You can make your own decisions on the likelihood (or not) of what happened.

One thing to mention though, Trump has stated that he will file a lawsuit against the WSJ for this statement, but then again, I am sure that the WSJ would not state something publicly that they cannot prove in court.
I saw the Loch Ness monster. Oh, and he was whisked up in a spaceship so he is no longer where I met him.
 
The good news about Trump’s law suit against the Journal, is now the Journal’s attorneys can reopen this case. Hopefully, these lawyers will ask what exactly was Trump’s relationship with Epstein, how many parties did he attend with Epstein in the 90s; how many underaged girls were at the parties he attended at Epstein’s, and thousands of other questions.

The interesting case about the OP’s lawsuit is that Trump never attacked the Plaintiff nor the attorneys. He was suspiciously quiet when we all know that Trump would go all out against his accusers, like he did with Stormy Daniels and many others.

Why didn’t Trump sue the Plaintiff or the attorneys? They accused Trump of child rape but yet he did nothing.

My feeling is that Trump settled out of Court for millions. It is why this case just disappeared.
 
If it is fake, you MAGA assholes are just getting a dose of your own medicine.

Well overdue.

Dear Sir,

I maybe a asshole but I am not one of those MAGA things and quite frankly I do not know what the jawn even is. I would appreciate...in the future you refrain from calling me one or even alluding to it.

Sincerely, MTF, non-baby killer
 
Last edited:
15th post
Dear Sir,

I maybe a asshole but I am not one of those MAGA things and quite frankly I do not know what the jawn even is. I would appreciate...in the future you refrain from calling me one or even alluding to it.

Sincerely, MTF, non-baby killer
You are most certainly one of those "MAGA things".

One of the most pathetic, mentally ill Trump dick lickers on this board.
 
Back
Top Bottom