Implications of Abolishing Fossil Fuels

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
7,966
Reaction score
3,770
Points
400
Location
DIXIE
Mar162020
Implications of Abolishing Fossil Fuels
Radicalized Joe Biden isn’t the only one. Many Democrats want to dramatically limit if not completely abolish the fossil fuels that make things go. Do they understand what they are attempting to impose? CFACT’s Paul Driessen has written an excellent piece on the implications of ridding the world of fossil fuels.

Wind and solar — inefficient, expensive, and unreliable techniques — would not merely have to generate as much electricity as fossil fuels do now. They would have to generate three times as much, because the plan calls for eliminating fossil fuels even for transportation, heating water, et cetera. Lefties want to get rid of nuclear and hydroelectric too.

The number of wind turbines and solar panels required would be surreal. There is no room for them in the cities where leftist policies originate. Rural communities will not want to be buried in them. Imposing them by force will further destabilize the country politically.

Acquiring the raw materials to create many thousands of turbines and millions of solar panels won’t be easy, especially since lefties don’t approve of mining.

Then there is the efficiency factor. Driessen observes that “it takes 79 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as one coal worker or two natural gas workers.” The drain on the economy would be massive. This illustration gives only a hint:

At the 8¢ per kWh in 2019, Virginia’s Inova Fairfax Women’s and Children’s Hospital pays about $1.6 million annually for electricity (based on typical hospital costs per square foot). At California’s (15¢ per kWh), or Germany’s business rate (22¢), Inova would have to shell out an extra $1.4-2.8 million a year for electricity. That would mean employee layoffs, higher medical bills, reduced patient care, more deaths.

That reflects the higher price of electricity in California and Germany due to ecomoonbattery. With no fossil fuel use at all, energy costs would go far higher.

Green lunacy is already causing real hardship in Europe:

In 2017, German families and businesses were pummeled by 172,000 localized blackouts. Last year, some 350,000 German families had their electricity cut off because they couldn’t pay their power bills. In Britain, millions of elderly people have to choose between heating and eating decent food; many spend their days in libraries to keep warm; and more than 3,000 die every year because they cannot heat their homes properly, making them more likely to succumb to respiratory, heart, flu or other diseases.

Across Europe, 11 million jobs are “at risk” because of an EU “green deal” that many say is suicidal.

Meanwhile, China and India merrily construct ever more power plants fueled by coal and gas as they prepare to overtake the West economically. If CO2 were a problem, it would not be solved if Europe and the USA emitted none of it at all.

Nonetheless, progressives are committed to pursuing the green agenda, not despite but because of the authoritarianism that will be required to impose it.

Click through; the whole piece is worth reading.

On a tip from R F.

All links highlighted....progressive , leftarded morons and especially cultist of the church watermelon an made global warming retards should absolutely voluntarily lead by example ...swear off all fossil fuels ,shit made with fossil fuels ...
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
65,369
Reaction score
9,118
Points
2,030
Mar162020
Implications of Abolishing Fossil Fuels
Radicalized Joe Biden isn’t the only one. Many Democrats want to dramatically limit if not completely abolish the fossil fuels that make things go. Do they understand what they are attempting to impose? CFACT’s Paul Driessen has written an excellent piece on the implications of ridding the world of fossil fuels.

Wind and solar — inefficient, expensive, and unreliable techniques — would not merely have to generate as much electricity as fossil fuels do now. They would have to generate three times as much, because the plan calls for eliminating fossil fuels even for transportation, heating water, et cetera. Lefties want to get rid of nuclear and hydroelectric too.

The number of wind turbines and solar panels required would be surreal. There is no room for them in the cities where leftist policies originate. Rural communities will not want to be buried in them. Imposing them by force will further destabilize the country politically.

Acquiring the raw materials to create many thousands of turbines and millions of solar panels won’t be easy, especially since lefties don’t approve of mining.

Then there is the efficiency factor. Driessen observes that “it takes 79 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as one coal worker or two natural gas workers.” The drain on the economy would be massive. This illustration gives only a hint:

At the 8¢ per kWh in 2019, Virginia’s Inova Fairfax Women’s and Children’s Hospital pays about $1.6 million annually for electricity (based on typical hospital costs per square foot). At California’s (15¢ per kWh), or Germany’s business rate (22¢), Inova would have to shell out an extra $1.4-2.8 million a year for electricity. That would mean employee layoffs, higher medical bills, reduced patient care, more deaths.

That reflects the higher price of electricity in California and Germany due to ecomoonbattery. With no fossil fuel use at all, energy costs would go far higher.

Green lunacy is already causing real hardship in Europe:

In 2017, German families and businesses were pummeled by 172,000 localized blackouts. Last year, some 350,000 German families had their electricity cut off because they couldn’t pay their power bills. In Britain, millions of elderly people have to choose between heating and eating decent food; many spend their days in libraries to keep warm; and more than 3,000 die every year because they cannot heat their homes properly, making them more likely to succumb to respiratory, heart, flu or other diseases.

Across Europe, 11 million jobs are “at risk” because of an EU “green deal” that many say is suicidal.

Meanwhile, China and India merrily construct ever more power plants fueled by coal and gas as they prepare to overtake the West economically. If CO2 were a problem, it would not be solved if Europe and the USA emitted none of it at all.

Nonetheless, progressives are committed to pursuing the green agenda, not despite but because of the authoritarianism that will be required to impose it.

Click through; the whole piece is worth reading.

On a tip from R F.

All links highlighted....progressive , leftarded morons and especially cultist of the church watermelon an made global warming retards should absolutely voluntarily lead by example ...swear off all fossil fuels ,shit made with fossil fuels ...
Nobody is advocating the complete change to new energy sources until they are developed to the point where they are more efficient. and sustainable. Quit whining about such childish fears.
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
28,918
Reaction score
9,833
Points
900
Location
Arizona
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.
 

Jimmy_Chitwood

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
7,301
Reaction score
1,221
Points
290
Location
SouthWestern Pennsylvania
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.

Nukes
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
65,369
Reaction score
9,118
Points
2,030
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.
Please list any specialized education you have to make you able to say all that. Where did you gain the knowledge you seem to think you have?
 
OP
Deplorable Yankee

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
7,966
Reaction score
3,770
Points
400
Location
DIXIE
Mar162020
Implications of Abolishing Fossil Fuels
Radicalized Joe Biden isn’t the only one. Many Democrats want to dramatically limit if not completely abolish the fossil fuels that make things go. Do they understand what they are attempting to impose? CFACT’s Paul Driessen has written an excellent piece on the implications of ridding the world of fossil fuels.

Wind and solar — inefficient, expensive, and unreliable techniques — would not merely have to generate as much electricity as fossil fuels do now. They would have to generate three times as much, because the plan calls for eliminating fossil fuels even for transportation, heating water, et cetera. Lefties want to get rid of nuclear and hydroelectric too.

The number of wind turbines and solar panels required would be surreal. There is no room for them in the cities where leftist policies originate. Rural communities will not want to be buried in them. Imposing them by force will further destabilize the country politically.

Acquiring the raw materials to create many thousands of turbines and millions of solar panels won’t be easy, especially since lefties don’t approve of mining.

Then there is the efficiency factor. Driessen observes that “it takes 79 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as one coal worker or two natural gas workers.” The drain on the economy would be massive. This illustration gives only a hint:

At the 8¢ per kWh in 2019, Virginia’s Inova Fairfax Women’s and Children’s Hospital pays about $1.6 million annually for electricity (based on typical hospital costs per square foot). At California’s (15¢ per kWh), or Germany’s business rate (22¢), Inova would have to shell out an extra $1.4-2.8 million a year for electricity. That would mean employee layoffs, higher medical bills, reduced patient care, more deaths.

That reflects the higher price of electricity in California and Germany due to ecomoonbattery. With no fossil fuel use at all, energy costs would go far higher.

Green lunacy is already causing real hardship in Europe:

In 2017, German families and businesses were pummeled by 172,000 localized blackouts. Last year, some 350,000 German families had their electricity cut off because they couldn’t pay their power bills. In Britain, millions of elderly people have to choose between heating and eating decent food; many spend their days in libraries to keep warm; and more than 3,000 die every year because they cannot heat their homes properly, making them more likely to succumb to respiratory, heart, flu or other diseases.

Across Europe, 11 million jobs are “at risk” because of an EU “green deal” that many say is suicidal.

Meanwhile, China and India merrily construct ever more power plants fueled by coal and gas as they prepare to overtake the West economically. If CO2 were a problem, it would not be solved if Europe and the USA emitted none of it at all.

Nonetheless, progressives are committed to pursuing the green agenda, not despite but because of the authoritarianism that will be required to impose it.

Click through; the whole piece is worth reading.

On a tip from R F.

All links highlighted....progressive , leftarded morons and especially cultist of the church watermelon an made global warming retards should absolutely voluntarily lead by example ...swear off all fossil fuels ,shit made with fossil fuels ...
Nobody is advocating the complete change to new energy sources until they are developed to the point where they are more efficient. and sustainable. Quit whining about such childish fears.

Say the dopey broad with her northern european socialist cobblestone street postcard dreams

Joe biden on stage



Steve Guest
@SteveGuest

·
Mar 15

Joe Biden: “no ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period, ends” #DemDebate


0:05
165.4K views
From

Video here
Twitter
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
65,369
Reaction score
9,118
Points
2,030
Mar162020
Implications of Abolishing Fossil Fuels
Radicalized Joe Biden isn’t the only one. Many Democrats want to dramatically limit if not completely abolish the fossil fuels that make things go. Do they understand what they are attempting to impose? CFACT’s Paul Driessen has written an excellent piece on the implications of ridding the world of fossil fuels.

Wind and solar — inefficient, expensive, and unreliable techniques — would not merely have to generate as much electricity as fossil fuels do now. They would have to generate three times as much, because the plan calls for eliminating fossil fuels even for transportation, heating water, et cetera. Lefties want to get rid of nuclear and hydroelectric too.

The number of wind turbines and solar panels required would be surreal. There is no room for them in the cities where leftist policies originate. Rural communities will not want to be buried in them. Imposing them by force will further destabilize the country politically.

Acquiring the raw materials to create many thousands of turbines and millions of solar panels won’t be easy, especially since lefties don’t approve of mining.

Then there is the efficiency factor. Driessen observes that “it takes 79 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as one coal worker or two natural gas workers.” The drain on the economy would be massive. This illustration gives only a hint:

At the 8¢ per kWh in 2019, Virginia’s Inova Fairfax Women’s and Children’s Hospital pays about $1.6 million annually for electricity (based on typical hospital costs per square foot). At California’s (15¢ per kWh), or Germany’s business rate (22¢), Inova would have to shell out an extra $1.4-2.8 million a year for electricity. That would mean employee layoffs, higher medical bills, reduced patient care, more deaths.

That reflects the higher price of electricity in California and Germany due to ecomoonbattery. With no fossil fuel use at all, energy costs would go far higher.

Green lunacy is already causing real hardship in Europe:

In 2017, German families and businesses were pummeled by 172,000 localized blackouts. Last year, some 350,000 German families had their electricity cut off because they couldn’t pay their power bills. In Britain, millions of elderly people have to choose between heating and eating decent food; many spend their days in libraries to keep warm; and more than 3,000 die every year because they cannot heat their homes properly, making them more likely to succumb to respiratory, heart, flu or other diseases.

Across Europe, 11 million jobs are “at risk” because of an EU “green deal” that many say is suicidal.

Meanwhile, China and India merrily construct ever more power plants fueled by coal and gas as they prepare to overtake the West economically. If CO2 were a problem, it would not be solved if Europe and the USA emitted none of it at all.

Nonetheless, progressives are committed to pursuing the green agenda, not despite but because of the authoritarianism that will be required to impose it.

Click through; the whole piece is worth reading.

On a tip from R F.

All links highlighted....progressive , leftarded morons and especially cultist of the church watermelon an made global warming retards should absolutely voluntarily lead by example ...swear off all fossil fuels ,shit made with fossil fuels ...
Nobody is advocating the complete change to new energy sources until they are developed to the point where they are more efficient. and sustainable. Quit whining about such childish fears.

Say the dopey broad with her northern european socialist cobblestone street postcard dreams

Joe biden on stage



Steve Guest
@SteveGuest

·
Mar 15

Joe Biden: “no ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period, ends” #DemDebate


0:05
165.4K views
From

Video here
Twitter
You're wrong all around, aren't you? How long do you think we could survive on the oil that has already been tapped and is waiting for us to pump it out of the ground dumb ass? By the way. If you think I'm a broad, I probably wouldn't be the first broad with balls bigger than yours.
 

there4eyeM

unlicensed metaphysician
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
15,451
Reaction score
2,266
Points
280
Yeah, we know all about these cylinder slingers and their recip engine addictions. Air and sound pollution inflicted on others means nothing to them. Improvements in life that even hint at changing their poor fascination with antique tech are out of the question.
Where is human intelligence?
 
OP
Deplorable Yankee

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
7,966
Reaction score
3,770
Points
400
Location
DIXIE
Yeah, we know all about these cylinder slingers and their recip engine addictions. Air and sound pollution inflicted on others means nothing to them. Improvements in life that even hint at changing their poor fascination with antique tech are out of the question.
Where is human intelligence?
Drive an ox cart and shut the fuck up moron

Useful idiots like you will only hurt the poor and the working masses .hopefully you're one of them cause you'll deserve it....like the idiot germans
 

there4eyeM

unlicensed metaphysician
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
15,451
Reaction score
2,266
Points
280
What a pleasure to 'trigger' such 'persons'!
 

there4eyeM

unlicensed metaphysician
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
15,451
Reaction score
2,266
Points
280
Poisoning and robbing the "poor" is good for them, liberating them from dangerous ancient technologies is bad for them. Endlessly enriching Exxon is for the best.
What a country!
 
OP
Deplorable Yankee

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
7,966
Reaction score
3,770
Points
400
Location
DIXIE
Poisoning and robbing the "poor" is good for them, liberating them from dangerous ancient technologies is bad for them. Endlessly enriching Exxon is for the best.
What a country!
Show em how it's done

You'll need new recycling tech i mean with all the waste solar and wind creates ...they cant bury windmill blades in landfills now as it is

Wanna touch poison solar panels and batteries ....slave labor batteries ....why do you hate little black African children ?

Get coding and tinkering in the garage brainwashed moron cough I mean rocket scientist lol
 

there4eyeM

unlicensed metaphysician
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
15,451
Reaction score
2,266
Points
280
The future is coming for all you crankshaft cranks and piston promoters.
Progress can only be held back for so long.
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
28,918
Reaction score
9,833
Points
900
Location
Arizona
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.
Please list any specialized education you have to make you able to say all that. Where did you gain the knowledge you seem to think you have?
Because I work in the industry.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
65,369
Reaction score
9,118
Points
2,030
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.
Please list any specialized education you have to make you able to say all that. Where did you gain the knowledge you seem to think you have?
Because I work in the industry.
Most people who work in the industry are not qualified to make the pronouncements you just did. Just because you worked in a refinery doesn't make you an engineer with special knowledge that makes you credible when you say there will never be any viable sources of energy other than what we use now. If you are just repeating what Alex Jones told you, own up to it.
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
28,918
Reaction score
9,833
Points
900
Location
Arizona
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.
Please list any specialized education you have to make you able to say all that. Where did you gain the knowledge you seem to think you have?
Because I work in the industry.
Most people who work in the industry are not qualified to make the pronouncements you just did. Just because you worked in a refinery doesn't make you an engineer with special knowledge that makes you credible when you say there will never be any viable sources of energy other than what we use now. If you are just repeating what Alex Jones told you, own up to it.
No moron, I work with experts and I also study it on my own. I’ve never listened to an Alex Jones show so have no idea WTF you are babbling about. So, sit tight unemployed in your home with your toilet paper rolls and let the real men continue to provide essential services.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
65,369
Reaction score
9,118
Points
2,030
They’re total retards that know nothing about energy and generation. Solar and wind simply cannot generate significant power on demand. If it ain’t windy, or it’s dark out, you get nothing. Then these morons say they can just build batteries for those times. Of course the amount of batteries would be insane, plus batteries are made of chemicals and by processes that aren’t green.

They also keep repeating this fantasy that investing in “research” is going to magically produce some new green energy technology that will give us abundant energy. It’s nothing but a money pit, there is no easy way to produce such energy. The only real hope we have is nuclear fusion but that is extremely expensive and probably a hundred years away until it would be feasible.
Please list any specialized education you have to make you able to say all that. Where did you gain the knowledge you seem to think you have?
Because I work in the industry.
Most people who work in the industry are not qualified to make the pronouncements you just did. Just because you worked in a refinery doesn't make you an engineer with special knowledge that makes you credible when you say there will never be any viable sources of energy other than what we use now. If you are just repeating what Alex Jones told you, own up to it.
No moron, I work with experts and I also study it on my own. I’ve never listened to an Alex Jones show so have no idea WTF you are babbling about. So, sit tight unemployed in your home with your toilet paper rolls and let the real men continue to provide essential services.
Then you shouldn't have a problem listing your expertise. Exactly how do you study on your own other than listening to right wing radio or reading the latest rant on facebook?
You're right. I am unemployed. I worked really hard to be able to retire, and I'm finally able to enjoy what i earned. I don't think you can tell me much about being a real man that I didn't already know when you were riding your bicycle.
 
OP
Deplorable Yankee

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
7,966
Reaction score
3,770
Points
400
Location
DIXIE
The future is coming for all you crankshaft cranks and piston promoters.
Progress can only be held back for so long.

Wot....now we're against technology and progress ?
:auiqs.jpg:

They really are dumbed down morons
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top