Impeachment possibility of Trump at all time high

[HikerGuy83]

Did it help Trump in 2020?

It did.

It was Covid and Trumps pathetic performance during Covid that cost him the election.

Everyone, pre-covid agreed he was headed to a second term.

 

[jacksonlamb]

You’re an impeachment groupie. You can’t even identify an impeachable offense.

You just cut and paste with no concept of what you cut and paste.

An impeachable offense is anything that the House says it is.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Anything but.

And their voters encourage that.

Phony impeachments only damage the Democrat credibility

Hollie: And their voters encourage that.

 

[Hollie]

An impeachable offense is anything that the House says it is.

Nonsense.

 

[Hollie]

Anything but.



Hollie: And their voters encourage that.

Hollie: And their voters encourage that.

 

[jacksonlamb]

And if Donkeys fly, pigs might too.
Impeached for what, retard?
Also, how does impeaching a president, when there's no chance for removal at all benefit members of Congress's constituents
in any way? It's a waste of time and taxpayer money.
Versus say..getting roads fixed and things like that.

That's your silly opinion without merit. Grounds for impeachment is anything the House says it is.

Impeachment demonstrates a sizeable number of voters are really pissed with the President.

And it is a public rebuke (a slap in the office) to the President.

 

[Hollie]

That's your silly opinion without merit. Grounds for impeachment is anything the House says it is.

Impeachment demonstrates a sizeable number of voters are really pissed with the President.

And it is a public rebuke (a slap in the office) to the President.

‘Really pissed” is grounds for impeachment?
Only in the warped, alternate reality of the taco muncher.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Nonsense.

Not at all. The House passes the indictment. Not you.

 

[Hollie]

Not at all. The House passes the indictment. Not you.

Moron, the Constitution has specific provisions for impeachment,

 

[jacksonlamb]

Moron, the Constitution has specific provisions for impeachment,

Yes, and nothing limits the House as to what can be used as a charge, only "High Crimes and Misdemeanours". What is a "High Crime."

 

[Captain Caveman]

That Trump could be impeached is at an all-time odds high, according to The Beast.

Many of this Board were horrified at his threat to end "civilization" in Iran, while a few screwballs egged him on.

I think that it is more likely that a stroke or heart attack or a brain aneurism is a more likely avenue of departure.

I, personally, do not support a want to be war-crimes President.

/www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-dealt-new-blow-as-impeachment-odds-hit-record-high/ar-AA20muwJ?ocid=msedgntp&pc=SCOODB&cvid=69d59ff564d84b46a38bc563d33cced4&ei=7

View attachment 1240908

This thread should be moved to the humour section.

 

[Hollie]

Yes, and nothing limits the House as to what can be used as a charge, only "High Crimes and Misdemeanours". What is a "High Crime."

Nonsense. The House can’t ignore the Constitution despite your whining otherwise.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Many of this Board were horrified at his threat to end "civilization" in Iran, while a few screwballs egged him on.

He said it, but did he do it?

Truman said nothing before dropping two atomic bombs on Japan.

Trump meant the”civilisation” of the Iran Regime. All those Mullahs, The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and so on.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Nonsense. The House can’t ignore the Constitution despite your whining otherwise.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. That's OK.

Chat AI clarifies the matter.

So can the House impeach for “anything”?​

1. The House has the sole power to impeach​

The Constitution gives the House exclusive authority to decide whether conduct qualifies as an impeachable offense.

Courts have repeatedly held that impeachment is a political question, meaning the judiciary cannot overrule the House’s decision.

2. But the House is still constrained by the Constitution​

They cannot impeach for reasons that violate constitutional protections — for example:

• Impeaching someone for their religion
• Impeaching someone for protected speech
• Impeaching someone for a constitutionally protected act

I hope this makes you feel better.

So, yes, there are misdeeds plenty to impeach Trump on.

 

[jacksonlamb]

He said it, but did he do it?

Truman said nothing before dropping two atomic bombs on Japan.

Trump meant the”civilisation” of the Iran Regime. All those Mullahs, The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and so on.

We all knew Trump meant Iranians as targets.

Truman and the bomb is for another time.

It was a war crime threat.

 

[struth]

Is that the thing God warned us about coming in the last days?

I thought it was a mini series that aired on NBC 30 years ago…I remember enjoying it

The Beast (1996 film) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Hollie]

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. That's OK.

Chat AI clarifies the matter.

So can the House impeach for “anything”?​

1. The House has the sole power to impeach​

The Constitution gives the House exclusive authority to decide whether conduct qualifies as an impeachable offense.

Courts have repeatedly held that impeachment is a political question, meaning the judiciary cannot overrule the House’s decision.

2. But the House is still constrained by the Constitution​

They cannot impeach for reasons that violate constitutional protections — for example:

• Impeaching someone for their religion
• Impeaching someone for protected speech
• Impeaching someone for a constitutionally protected act

I hope this makes you feel better.

So, yes, there are misdeeds plenty to impeach Trump on.

Lots of cutting and pasting.and you don’t understand what you Cut and pasted.

Cut and paste Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Lots of cutting and pasting.and you don’t understand what you Cut and pasted.

Cut and paste Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

It's called "research," a term you don't get, and it clarifies the Constitution and its limitations.

Hollie is not the decider. The House is.

 

[Hollie]

We all knew Trump meant Iranians as targets.

Truman and the bomb is for another time.

It was a war crime threat.

A war crime threat? You taco munchers are hilarious.

 

[Hollie]

It's called "research," a term you don't get, and it clarifies the Constitution and its limitations.

Hollie is not the decider. The House is.

Hollie instructed you to cut and paste the part of the Constitution that addresses impeachment.

Your Chat bot is not the Constitution.

Do as you’re told, Chatbot.