You have a very limited understanding as to what "growing" means.
Not really.
I understand that a nation may grow in a great many areas of effort and focus and circumstance.
But many of those areas of growth are subordinate to the highest macro-level limitation... physical space.
And many other areas of growth are subordinate to the next-highest macro-level limitation... physical resources... a second-hand and indirect connection to physical space....
And we have a
great abundance of physical space and natural resources, as I have proven here time and time and time again.
What is this 'proof' you speak of, Unk?
Population density figures, vis a vis other countries?
We may very well be listed as No. 142 out of 192 countries, in population density.
Good on us.
Let's keep it that way.
Let's not start climbing up the ladder, to 141, or 140, or 139, or 138, or beyond.
We have 300,000,000+ souls on-board, according to the US Census Bureau.
We had 150,000,000 souls on-board in 1950.
In 60 years, we doubled our population.
Doubled.
As a percentage of income, costs were lower across the board in 1950.
With twice as many people, we now have twice as much demand, vs. 1950.
Twice as much demand for housing, food, education, medical care, jobs, etc.
This is not a healthy development.
It erodes the Quality of Life, in favor of a Quantity of Life.
We have no further need for large-scale immigration.
We actually need to prune-back our population a bit.
And if declining fertility and birth rates will help do the trick, then, great.
And if a growing Senior Citizen population (The Aging of the Boomers) will help do the trick, then, great.
We could drop 50,000,000 or even 100,000,000 total souls from our population of 300,000,000 and still be just fine, with lots of room for everyone, and a lower demand for the necessities of life.
We can do that through a 30 or 40 or 50 -year Strategic Plan for population control, without being invasive or brutal like the Chinese found themselves becoming a few decades ago.
Eventually, the Boomers will fade from the scene, and the imbalance in the Aging demographic will bottom-out and level-off and self-correct.
Eventually, the declining birth-rate will bottom-out and level-off and self-correct.
And we'll STILL be a strong, vital nation of 250,000,000 or 200,000,000 - able to care for our own, with room for all, and resources for all.
We have a great abundance of physical space and resources?
You'll get a strong argument out of a great many people (myself included) over that one.
However...
Even if what you say is true, then...
Good... excellent... let's KEEP it that way...
By reducing the population a bit over the long term, and throttling-back on things that contribute to an increase in population, such as large-scale immigration...
The fewer the people, the more resources for those already here... Quality, not Quantity.