The specific policies do vary, but the overall goal is that no one working 40 hours a week should live in poverty. 3 people own more wealth than the bottom 50% of Americans. Doesn’t that bother republicans? 78% of workers in contrast, live paycheck to paycheck. Does anyone actually think the GOP will do anything about this?
American progressive politics have nothing to do with communism and paying everyone the same regardless of the work. It’s about strengthening the middle class and helping to alleviate poverty.
The government shutdown spotlights a bigger issue: 78% of US workers live paycheck to paycheck
The 3 Richest Americans Hold More Wealth Than Bottom 50% Of The Country, Study Finds
First-40 hours per week and live comfortably is not in the constitution-my wife and I both worked two jobs to put our kids thru college. Rich people have been around forever-I expect to get what I earn, not what someone gives me or what WE can take from them. In the sixties with a strong middle class, people worked hard to do a good job FIRST, and they knew the pay would come-raises and sometimes bonuses. I don't see that anymore, it's "show me the money". I am not a Republican and there should be tax adjustments getting more from the wealthy, but I don't see the average worker deserving of any more than he is getting now. If he changes then I'll say "give him more".
Things like inflation and the cost of living matter. Wages are way behind on both. A lack of can-do spirit isn’t the problem. Millions of people have NO CHOICE but to live in poverty because higher wage jobs are scare and extremely competitive.
People do have a choice. You can not have children until you are financially capable of supporting them. You don't have to have the newest I-phone and 50 video games for each of the four game systems you have. You don't need cable or satellite television with 500 channels plus movies.
So why do people live in poverty? For a number of reasons, but at the top of the list are drugs.
I had a couple move out of one of my apartments a few years ago. Good kids, but they loved their pot. They both worked at restaurants and didn't make much money. But it was their choice. They opted to not pursue better paying jobs or a career in something because better paying jobs usually have mandatory drug testing.
It's not just a personal experience that has me believing this. My employer has a hell of a time replacing a worker or expanding because he can't find younger people who are not on drugs.
My father is a retired bricklayer. His union sends their retirees updates on what's going on in their former trade. They were begging their retirees to help find younger people to get into the trade. Oh, the union found people, but none that could pass a drug test. And mind you, it's very hard work, but also pays very, very well. Up north here, currently 50 bucks an hour when everything is figured in.
So you can't give us that line that good paying jobs are hard to find. It's more like the good paying jobs can't find Americans to work them.
Walmart to hire hundreds of truck drivers, raise salary to nearly $90,000