Illegals are the future of democrat party power

[Frankeneinstein]

First off
The Constitution says count persons not citizens

like tourists?

Second
Texas and Arizona have large populations of noncitizens and vote red

so lets stop counting them

 

[rightwinger]

like tourists?

so lets stop counting them

Change the Constitution

 

[Hafar1014]

Change the Constitution

Dont have to just define a person and the SC will do that. It means legal voter

 

[rightwinger]

Dont have to just define a person and the SC will do that. It means legal voter

It would have to apply to every definition of person

If the Constitution meant count citizens, it would say so

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

First off
The Constitution says count persons not citizens

Second
Texas and Arizona have large populations of noncitizens and vote red

Yup.
Now boot all the illegal aliens and stop counting them for apportionment.

 

[rightwinger]

Yup.
Now boot all the illegal aliens and stop counting them for apportionment.

You still end up with legal aliens being counted in the Census

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You still end up with legal aliens being counted in the Census

That's fine.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Change the Constitution

to start, or to stop counting tourists?

 

[rightwinger]

to start, or to stop counting tourists?

Tourists don’t count

But they count people in every residence
Citizen or not

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Tourists don’t count

as a person"?

But they count people in every residence

so they don't count the homeless that are citizens, but do count non citizens?

Citizen or not

even tourists? who are "persons"!...the constitution doesn't need to be changed, just the white liberal translation of it, which if it doesn't come out of the TV will be much harder to do than the current process.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Tourists don’t count

They fit perfectly into your definition of what the constitution says, it says "person", does it make any distinction between tourists and "person"? citizen does.

 

[rightwinger]

They fit perfectly into your definition of what the constitution says, it says "person", does it make any distinction between tourists and "person"? citizen does.

Who is Counted

• • The census counts every person residing in the United States, including all states, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas.
    
  • It includes people of all ages, races, ethnic groups, and both citizens and noncitizens, as the framers intended an "enumeration of persons" rather than just citizens.
    

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Who is Counted

• • The census counts every person residing in the United States, including all states, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas.

without the definition of residence that is both meaningless and open to interpretation

• • It includes people of all ages, races, ethnic groups, and both citizens and noncitizens, as the framers intended an "enumeration of persons" rather than just citizens.

^that "intent^" of the framers is just one interpretation; all one need do now is reinterpret it...it is also proof the framers did not include residence [as white liberals view it] in their draft of the constitution, in fact it concludes that they saw no difference between "tourist" and "non resident...personally I would not only count them but would grant them amnesty as well, and would love to trade all our white liberals for all of them.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Who is Counted

the argument is, should they be counted

• • The census counts every person residing in the United States, including all states, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas.

big deal

• • It includes people of all ages, races, ethnic groups, and both citizens and noncitizens, as the framers intended an "enumeration of persons" rather than just citizens.

you intentionally didn't mention 'both legally and illegally'
perhaps they did so, so that the government can round up the "rather than just citizens" types, it would/does make deporting them easier.

 

[rightwinger]

the argument is, should they be counted

big deal

you intentionally didn't mention 'both legally and illegally'
perhaps they did so, so that the government can round up the "rather than just citizens" types, it would/does make deporting them easier.

The Constitution intentionally didn’t mention

But maybe the TRUMPCourt will once again ignore the Constitution when asked by Trump

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The Constitution intentionally didn’t mention

didn't mention what?

But maybe the TRUMPCourt will once again ignore the Constitution when asked by Trump

Are you trying not to say "the most diverse court in our history"...btw you suggested changing the constitution on this matter...as for trump, you brought him on yourself, but you can still yell racist and fix everything.

 

[Hollie]

Only citizens vote

Except for the illegals voting.

Illegal Immigration and Election Law: Downstream Consequences on Display in Pennsylvania Voter Rolls Transparency Case

Welcome to March Madness time, when underdogs seem to come out of nowhere to defeat much higher-rank...

fedsoc.org

 

[Hollie]

The Constitution intentionally didn’t mention

But maybe the TRUMPCourt will once again ignore the Constitution when asked by Trump

There is no Trump court.

 

[Unkotare]

Except for the illegals voting.
...

How many?

 

[rightwinger]

There is no Trump court.