I'll just leave this here......

[OldLady]

but with Trump in, she's going to keep pushing. She's determined, that's for sure. I just wish she didn't have to do it

Hate is a brutal master. Maybe God will take her since she stands against the Lord's anointed.

Hate is a brutal master.
Well, you would know.

We wouldn't make such an obviously tired old woman, keep working.

Her hate is.

Her love is.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Hate is a brutal master.
Well, you would know

Yes. I've been watching the Left

 

[Correll]

but with Trump in, she's going to keep pushing. She's determined, that's for sure. I just wish she didn't have to do it

Hate is a brutal master. Maybe God will take her since she stands against the Lord's anointed.

Hate is a brutal master.
Well, you would know.

We wouldn't make such an obviously tired old woman, keep working.

Her hate is.

Her love is.

No, she has bought into the nonsense that Trump is a monster, and she is pushing herself to keep working when she is old and tired, and should be enjoying retirement.


That is partisan hate, not love.

 

[DOTR]

`

Damn! What happened?

Years of bitterness and hatred.

 

[OldLady]

All your projections are obviously transparent.

 

[midcan5]

You go Girl....

'Epilogue to the Paperback Edition: The Crossroad '

"But there is another, deeper reason why the American right needs to retain its grasp on the Supreme Court. They have ambitious plans for the high Court-plans that rival anything conservative litigators have attempted since the Lochner Era. But all those plans will be ruined if the Court tips to the left.

The one empty seat on the Supreme Court could swell to four, as there are three other seats occupied by justices who are quite elderly. When the next president is sworn in, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg will both be older than 80; Justice Stephen Breyer will be not far behind at 78. That means that the next president could fill as many as four seats on the Supreme Court.

It is worth noting, moreover, that Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer were all in the majority in King. If they are all replaced by justices more akin to Scalia, millions of people could lose their health care in a heartbeat.

There are many key players in the conservative legal establishment who would happily take matters much further than that. House Judiciary Chair Bob GoodIatte has said that Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are all unconstitutional." Senator Mike Lee-a former clerk to Justice Alito and potential Supreme Court nominee in a Republican administration=-has, at various times, claimed that child labor laws, food stamps, the Food and Drug Administration, federal disaster relief, Medicaid, income assistance for the poor, Medicare, and Social Security all violate the Constitution." Justice Clarence Thomas, of course, embraces the same narrow reading of Congress's power to regulate commerce that animated many decisions in the Lochner Era.25

If someone sharing these views is elected president in 2016, their justices could join with Thomas to rethink nearly eight decades of constitutional law. The Affordable Care Act, the Civil Rights Act, the right to join a union, the minimum wage, and even federal child labor laws could all be on the chopping block

But even if these most radical elements do not ultimately gain control of the Supreme Court, a Court filled with four more Scalia as or Alitos would be more conservative-and more willing to impose its will on the nation-than any Court since the Lochner Era. And, as King v. Burwell shows, the scope of such a Court's ambitions could not be anticipated simply by reading existing legal opinions or even by examining the new justices' own writings.
America would enter an age very much like the first Lochner Era, when the Court claimed the right to censor laws, regardless of whether they had a legal basis to do so." Lochner era - Wikipedia

"Few American institutions have inflicted greater suffering on ordinary people than the Supreme Court of the United States. Since its inception, the justices of the Supreme Court have shaped a nation where children toiled in coal mines, where Americans could be forced into camps because of their race, and where a woman could be sterilized against her will by state law. "

'Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted' Ian Millhiser

Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted by Ian Millhiser

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Back when we were more civil, she was confirmed by 90+ Senators. She's mostly wrong on almost everything, except privacy- hopefully she can school Kavanaugh.

 

[Correll]

You go Girl....

'Epilogue to the Paperback Edition: The Crossroad '

"But there is another, deeper reason why the American right needs to retain its grasp on the Supreme Court. They have ambitious plans for the high Court-plans that rival anything conservative litigators have attempted since the Lochner Era. But all those plans will be ruined if the Court tips to the left.

The one empty seat on the Supreme Court could swell to four, as there are three other seats occupied by justices who are quite elderly. When the next president is sworn in, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg will both be older than 80; Justice Stephen Breyer will be not far behind at 78. That means that the next president could fill as many as four seats on the Supreme Court.

It is worth noting, moreover, that Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer were all in the majority in King. If they are all replaced by justices more akin to Scalia, millions of people could lose their health care in a heartbeat.

There are many key players in the conservative legal establishment who would happily take matters much further than that. House Judiciary Chair Bob GoodIatte has said that Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are all unconstitutional." Senator Mike Lee-a former clerk to Justice Alito and potential Supreme Court nominee in a Republican administration=-has, at various times, claimed that child labor laws, food stamps, the Food and Drug Administration, federal disaster relief, Medicaid, income assistance for the poor, Medicare, and Social Security all violate the Constitution." Justice Clarence Thomas, of course, embraces the same narrow reading of Congress's power to regulate commerce that animated many decisions in the Lochner Era.25

If someone sharing these views is elected president in 2016, their justices could join with Thomas to rethink nearly eight decades of constitutional law. The Affordable Care Act, the Civil Rights Act, the right to join a union, the minimum wage, and even federal child labor laws could all be on the chopping block

But even if these most radical elements do not ultimately gain control of the Supreme Court, a Court filled with four more Scalia as or Alitos would be more conservative-and more willing to impose its will on the nation-than any Court since the Lochner Era. And, as King v. Burwell shows, the scope of such a Court's ambitions could not be anticipated simply by reading existing legal opinions or even by examining the new justices' own writings.
America would enter an age very much like the first Lochner Era, when the Court claimed the right to censor laws, regardless of whether they had a legal basis to do so." Lochner era - Wikipedia

"Few American institutions have inflicted greater suffering on ordinary people than the Supreme Court of the United States. Since its inception, the justices of the Supreme Court have shaped a nation where children toiled in coal mines, where Americans could be forced into camps because of their race, and where a woman could be sterilized against her will by state law. "

'Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted' Ian Millhiser

Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted by Ian Millhiser

Interesting. IN the linked article, do they ever try to support their panic mongering?

 

[DOTR]

`

​

Windparadox

Need personal content with a cut and paste​

No question I despise some of her politics and contributions to the American Cultural Revolution. No doubt she was an amazingly beautiful young woman, and remains a spunky, feisty old gal.

But look how many beautiful young women she has destroyed.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Anybody understand the point of this thread?

Okay, so she was beautiful many decades ago.

That means WHAT as far as her spot on the Supreme Court?

 

[DOTR]

Anybody understand the point of this thread?

Okay, so she was beautiful many decades ago.

That means WHAT as far as her spot on the Supreme Court?

Apparently I t means we need nice looking women to look at. The Democrats aren’t providing though.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

So she's not a young girl any more, but smart has always been hotter than perky tits. . The Notorious RGB is still as attractive as she ever was.

No, she's not. She is old as fuck. If she is even still alive.

Boys generally feel that way. A man understands there is a lot more than perky tits that make a woman attractive.

Absolutely, perky tits are not the most important thing, a really well rounded ass.....ahhh now that’s hot!

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Apparently I t means we need nice looking women to look at. The Democrats aren’t providing though

Yet another reason for the tired old bat to retire

 

[Muhammed]

So she's not a young girl any more, but smart has always been hotter than perky tits. . The Notorious RGB is still as attractive as she ever was.

No, she's not. She is old as fuck. If she is even still alive.

Boys generally feel that way. A man understands there is a lot more than perky tits that make a woman attractive.

No, she's old as fuck and looks like hell. She is not attractive.

That you are in denial of that fact, is just one more piece of evidence, nay, PROOF, that liberalism is a mental disorder.

Bulldog is not a liberal. He's a commie/pinko America hating jackass party of slavery supporter.

 

[Correll]

So she's not a young girl any more, but smart has always been hotter than perky tits. . The Notorious RGB is still as attractive as she ever was.

No, she's not. She is old as fuck. If she is even still alive.

Boys generally feel that way. A man understands there is a lot more than perky tits that make a woman attractive.

No, she's old as fuck and looks like hell. She is not attractive.

That you are in denial of that fact, is just one more piece of evidence, nay, PROOF, that liberalism is a mental disorder.

Bulldog is not a liberal. He's a commie/pinko America hating jackass party of slavery supporter.

You say tomAto, I say TOmato.

 

[sparky]

more book/cover BS

 

[BULLDOG]

So she's not a young girl any more, but smart has always been hotter than perky tits. . The Notorious RGB is still as attractive as she ever was.

No, she's not. She is old as fuck. If she is even still alive.

Boys generally feel that way. A man understands there is a lot more than perky tits that make a woman attractive.

No, she's old as fuck and looks like hell. She is not attractive.

That you are in denial of that fact, is just one more piece of evidence, nay, PROOF, that liberalism is a mental disorder.

Bulldog is not a liberal. He's a commie/pinko America hating jackass party of slavery supporter.

I will be sure to give your opinion all the consideration it deserves.

 

[Sahba]

`

Damn! What happened?

Rumor has it... a 1/5th for breakfast, lunch and dinner; not sure about while in chambers...

 

[BULLDOG]

`

Damn! What happened?

Rumor has it... a 1/5th for breakfast, lunch and dinner; not sure about while in chambers...

Seems to be a long list of crazy right wing rumors. Did those Walmart Tunnels ever pan out?

 

[Tilly]

. I just wish she didn't have to do it.

She doesn’t.