If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.

[Sunsettommy]

No increase in Tornadoes, Hurricanes, no increase in major storms

No increase in Wildfires

No HOT SPOT after 35 years

No Positive Feedback Loop

No Sea Level acceleration

No Climate Emergency exist

There is plenty more to show that warmist/alarmists are pushing a barrage of lies everyday while there is nothing horrible going on.

Me - And how is any of this relevant to the science? There are still ways that natural disasters are getting worse.

And we don't want the consequences of delaying it!

You post nothing of value, my post stands unchallenged since you didn't employ a factual based reply at all.

There is NO increase in storminess as Tornadoes and Hurricanes are not increasing just the delusional level of warmist/alarmists who have a talent for generating illusions in their small heads.

You are continuing to have a zero batting average.

 

[catatomic]

You post nothing of value, my post stands unchallenged since you didn't employ a factual based reply at all.

There is NO increase in storminess as Tornadoes and Hurricanes are not increasing just the delusional level of warmist/alarmists who have a talent for generating illusions in their small heads.

You are continuing to have a zero batting average.

Yes I did.

For instance the first one:

"No increase in Tornadoes, Hurricanes, no increase in major storms."

Yes but they are fiercer.

Please quit posting more and more of this as it's nothing new.

 

[ding]

Just forget it everyone and don't backbite me.

Peace.

I wasn't back biting or ignoring you. I am presenting non-controversial empirical climate evidence from the geologic record.

 

[ding]

(I feel that I've answered everyone enough to show that I may be able to answer everyone totally)

I disagree. I'm not trying to be offensive but I find you to quite ignorant of the science and even the claims of the IPCC.

 

[catatomic]

I remain a smart believer.

 

[ding]

I remain a smart believer.

I disagree. You are ignorant on all aspects of AGW other than you were told to believe it.

 

[catatomic]

I disagree. You are ignorant on all aspects of AGW other than you were told to believe it.

You told me to believe you and I believe I gave you due process. I can't listen to someone forever that nobody in the world acknowledges as meaningful and I checked some things.

 

[mamooth]

Because the data shows the models are crap.

The models have been awesome. They've done a stellar job of predicting temperature. In contrast, your cult has faceplanted hard with every prediction for over 40 years now. Your record of failure is perfect and unblemished.

The models says there should be a "Hot Spot" where is it fella, under your bed.... perhaps...

And it's there. Remember, you're not talking to your fellow cult mouthbreathers here. You're talking to people who know the topic, so we know you're lying. This has been pointed out to you before, so you can't use ignorance as an excuse. Your dishonesty is very deliberate.

The Models says there should be a Positive Feedback Loop, which has never existed in history of the world,

Is it that you don't know what a positive feedback loop is, or are you just lying about it? I'll cut you a break here, and assume you're just being a cult imbecile, instead of knowingly lying.

Back in the real world, we see that a positive feedback loop is how the planet cycles out of glacial period. Orbital factors warm the southern oceans a bit, the oceans release CO2, that warms the planet more, and a positive feedback loop keeps the warming going. The logarithmic nature of the feedback prevents it from being runaway feedback.

This is basic stuff, and you faceplant at it. You have no business annoying the grownups with your childish tantrums.

You know what to do now. Do the same thing you always do when you get called on your BS. Piss yourself, scream insults and run. As you run away, declare that you've already proven everything, because you linked to a crap propaganda site. Such cowardly and dishonest behavior from you is inevitable, so just get it over with.

 

[mamooth]

1. Write the conclusion you want.

Yeah, yeah, the denier tactic. For example, Willie Soon accepted over $1.2 million from rich deniers, and in return he cranked out papers saying whatever they wanted.

Other deniers work in different ways. Curry started a "consulting" business, though the clients and output are not disclosed. Hmmm.

On our side, the opposite happens. Any reputable climate scientist could get very rich if they lied for the deniers. They don't. They refuse all bribe money, which gives them even more credibility.

Follow the money. All the corrupting bribe money flows to the denier side, so all of the fraud and garbage science comes from the denier side.

I'm just making it clear where we all stand. Deniers embrace corruption and bribery, while the rational side rejects it.

 

[Sunsettommy]

The models have been awesome. They've done a stellar job of predicting temperature. In contrast, your cult has faceplanted hard with every prediction for over 40 years now. Your record of failure is perfect and unblemished.

And it's there. Remember, you're not talking to your fellow cult mouthbreathers here. You're talking to people who know the topic, so we know you're lying. This has been pointed out to you before, so you can't use ignorance as an excuse. Your dishonesty is very deliberate.


Is it that you don't know what a positive feedback loop is, or are you just lying about it? I'll cut you a break here, and assume you're just being a cult imbecile, instead of knowingly lying.

Back in the real world, we see that a positive feedback loop is how the planet cycles out of glacial period. Orbital factors warm the southern oceans a bit, the oceans release CO2, that warms the planet more, and a positive feedback loop keeps the warming going. The logarithmic nature of the feedback prevents it from being runaway feedback.

This is basic stuff, and you faceplant at it. You have no business annoying the grownups with your childish tantrums.

You know what to do now. Do the same thing you always do when you get called on your BS. Piss yourself, scream insults and run. As you run away, declare that you've already proven everything, because you linked to a crap propaganda site. Such cowardly and dishonest behavior from you is inevitable, so just get it over with.

I see you manage another rebuttal free reply because as many here knows you have been given the official data many times which you ignore that is why you come back with another delusional pile of lies because you are a leftist moron.

The official data does NOT show a "hot spot", and you know it since you never challenge it factually.

You glossed over the total absence of the Positive Feedback Loop because it has never existed from day one

These two facts show the modeling scenarios are failures as those two are supposed to be the backbone of the stupid AGW delusion.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Yeah, yeah, the denier tactic. For example, Willie Soon accepted over $1.2 million from rich deniers, and in return he cranked out papers saying whatever they wanted.

Other deniers work in different ways. Curry started a "consulting" business, though the clients and output are not disclosed. Hmmm.

On our side, the opposite happens. Any reputable climate scientist could get very rich if they lied for the deniers. They don't. They refuse all bribe money, which gives them even more credibility.

Follow the money. All the corrupting bribe money flows to the denier side, so all of the fraud and garbage science comes from the denier side.

I'm just making it clear where we all stand. Deniers embrace corruption and bribery, while the rational side rejects it.

Actually, most of the money is flowing heavily until recently on the climate change scammers said a fact that has been known for years but you lie casually because are a well programmed leftist moron.

 

[ding]

You told me to believe you and I believe I gave you due process. I can't listen to someone forever that nobody in the world acknowledges as meaningful and I checked some things.

I never told you to believe me.

I followed a process. You blindly accepted what you were told.

 

[catatomic]

I never told you to believe me.

I followed a process. You blindly accepted what you were told.

I checked some of the things you posted.

 

[otto105]

Prager had an expert detail the crock of crap sold as climate change.
I have said lots of times, if it was happening, you would see this at Death Valley. Why that Valley? Because it holds the world record for heat.

So to help you sleep, watch this video.

...It Must Be Climate Change! | PragerU

What do hurricanes, wildfires, floods, extreme cold, extreme heat, and even airplane turbulence have in common? According to environmental activists, they’re…

www.prageru.com

prager u


Fuckup hilarious bob.

 

[ding]

I checked some of the things you posted.

And?

 

[Sunsettommy]

And?

...he can't address them that is why he plays the dodge game to hide his obvious inability to discuss some BASIC science.

 

[ding]

...he can't address them that is why he plays the dodge game to hide his obvious inability to discuss some BASIC science.

I've yet to find anyone who believes in AGW know why they believe in it other than they have been told to believe it.

 

[catatomic]

As, I've mentioned, I want to avoid pointless endless debate.

 

[Sunsettommy]

As, I've mentioned, I want to avoid pointless endless debate.

I admit you do that very well; thus no one here is impressed by your profound science illiteracy.

 

[ding]

As, I've mentioned, I want to avoid pointless endless debate.

And yet you keep coming back for more.

But I don't see this as pointless.