Fudging variables by not allowing for natural warming is literally what they have done.
If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.
- Thread starter Robert W
- Start date
How about this one then? It shows the exact same thing. The last interglacial period was 2C warmer than today with 120 ppm less CO2. How do you explain that?
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
The graph I saw said otherwise.
No idea what you are trying to say here.
What did the graph you saw show?
Maybe try googling, "was the previous interglacial period warmer than today?"
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
You don't debate, you leave one liners then run off over and over in the thread, here is perfect example on why I am calling you a liar,
=====
You stated: "The models are correct across the 150 years."
My reply which you ignored:
No, you are lying just like everyone else which is why you have no remaining credibility while there are no increasing problems out there:
No increase in Tornadoes, Hurricanes, no increase in major storms
No increase in Wildfires
No HOT SPOT after 35 years
No Positive Feedback Loop
No Sea Level acceleration
No Climate Emergency exist
There is plenty more to show that warmist/alarmists are pushing a barrage of lies everyday while there is nothing horrible going on."
That was post 486.
=====
Also posted the chart covering the Interglacial period that makes clear there is ZERO relationship between CO2 and Temperature changes for over a 10,000 year period.
You ignored it.
These two modeling predictions have failed utterly, a fact YOU ignored.
======
HA HA HA, there goes another bald-faced liar low science literate fool running away as I haven't ignored you at all.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
You're still ignoring me.
You still haven't explained how the last interglacial period could be 2C warmer than today, with 26 ft higher seas than today and 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
You are still lying and avoiding discussing anything.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
Just did. Not trying to be prideful or anything. France ditched cars and went from super smog to super clean
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
Your pathetic deflection needs a lot of work as we were not talking about pollution cars.
You have nothing to offer because you don't know much of anything.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
It's called adding something. I responded to ding and then made a great point about Paris.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
I am a genius and I've studied climate change quite a bit.
There's a lot I don't know but there's one thing obvious to me: every true scientist is in very good agreement with the science.
When people raise objections, you already know scientists are aware of them; chat GPT is aware of them already too and it can weed them out for people as well.
There's a lot I don't know but there's one thing obvious to me: every true scientist is in very good agreement with the science.
When people raise objections, you already know scientists are aware of them; chat GPT is aware of them already too and it can weed them out for people as well.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Zone1 From now on I will no longer be tyroneweaver, but the Most Reverend tyrone- Started by tyroneweaver
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
